| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
RM
Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 16 Jun 2007
Posts: 46
Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:17 pm Post subject: PDF800 SET3 Question 5 |
 |
|
Is |x| < 1?
1. |x+1| = 2|x-1|
2. |x-3| NE 0
(NE: Not equal to) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
roopachet
Just gettin' started!
Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 6
Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 6:53 pm Post subject: answer |
|
|
I think the answer to this problem is A. Solving the first equation we get that x=1 or x=-1 in any case the absolute value of X will be 1 which is greater than 1
Second clue doesnt actually help as xNE 3 as in X can take any value.
Just try checking this answer with others I might not be correct though I feel this might be correct.
Roopachet |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
beny
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
Joined: 20 Jul 2007
Posts: 214
Thanks given: 0
Thanked 2 times in 2 posts
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
roopachet's explanation, as usual, makes no sense and is completely incorrect.
1.) Tells you X = 3 OR 1/3. Insufficient.
2.) Tells you X NE 3. Insufficient.
Together, X = 1/3. Sufficient.
Answer is C. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
givemeanid
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
Joined: 17 Jun 2007
Posts: 277
Thanks given: 0
Thanked 2 times in 2 posts
Location: New York, NY
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | roopachet's explanation, as usual, makes no sense and is completely incorrect. |
beny, I have following some other posts of yours too and it seems like you are taking this personally. You need to calm down and stop making personal remarks. Remember that just because a problem/solution/concept is easy for you DOES NOT mean that its easy for everybody else.
_________________
So It Goes |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gabriel
Managing Director
Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Posts: 865
Thanks given: 118
Thanked 27 times in 26 posts
Location: India
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| givemeanid wrote: | | Quote: | | roopachet's explanation, as usual, makes no sense and is completely incorrect. |
beny, I have following some other posts of yours too and it seems like you are taking this personally. You need to calm down and stop making personal remarks. Remember that just because a problem/solution/concept is easy for you DOES NOT mean that its easy for everybody else. |
i agree .. beny u need to stop targeting a a particular forum user .. dont get me wrong over here .. it is great to see u helping out the members over here .. but u need to understand that there is always going to be someone on the forum who is better than u and also someone who is not as good as u in solving quant .. remember the point behind the whole forum is to learn from each others experience .. So plz stop making personal remarks .. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
roopachet
Just gettin' started!
Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 6
Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 3:42 pm Post subject: What the hell |
|
|
I answered the question, like only twice in the entire time since I joined beathegmat who are you benny or whatever to take it so personally. I accept that i may be wrong when i say i think so. DO YOU OWN THIS SITE?
Last edited by roopachet on Sat Aug 04, 2007 7:04 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
beatthegmat
Founder
Joined: 13 Feb 2006
Posts: 3774
Thanks given: 29
Thanked 221 times in 124 posts
Location: California
GMAT Score: 720
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Agreed with gabriel--we're all here to learn together! I want Beat The GMAT to be the nicest and most supportive GMAT community on the Internet...
Thanks!
_________________
Eric
Discounts on Kaplan, Manhattan GMAT, Veritas Prep, and Stacy Blackman Consulting - see the links at the top of the page for more info.
Learn more about me |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
