oxygen gmatprep2

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:00 am
Thanked: 6 times

oxygen gmatprep2

by anksgupta » Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:22 am
Please discuss this CR taken from gmatprep2
Attachments
superoxy.jpg
I have removed my option and OA
Live n Love GMAT

Legendary Member
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:14 am
Thanked: 13 times

by ketkoag » Sun Jun 21, 2009 4:07 am
IMO B.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 148
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:04 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:1 members

by ghacker » Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:35 pm
the BF refutes the entrepreneur's claim

Only C does the same thing

what is the only way that oxygen can be absorbed is through the lungs , then no point in drinking oxygenated water

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:55 pm
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:1 members

by vinaynp » Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:43 pm
IMO C) . Everything else does not make sense here.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 67
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:46 pm
Location: Karachi
Thanked: 1 times

ans

by barira1 » Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:55 pm
whats the answer?

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:53 pm
Thanked: 11 times

by Robinmrtha » Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:08 pm
We have to support the claim that the bottled water in no good in improving performance...and this can only be supported by statement C
if the only way to get oxygen into the bloodstream is through the lungs...then no matter how much the water is used by the athletes it wont do any good...because its the lungs that play the important role to get the oxygen...to the bloodstream......
And remember lungs do not take in water they take air....

User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 532
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:39 pm
Location: Barcelona
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:640

by hk » Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:26 pm
First, know what is the role of the boldface statement --> Its role is to tell us that the SuperOXY thing is not going to work. Hence we need to pick an answer which tells the same thing.

Statement C does this very well.
Wanna know what I'm upto? Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/harikrish

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:41 pm
Thanked: 9 times
GMAT Score:770

by raghavsarathy » Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:40 pm
IMO D. This is because it says that amount of oxygen is not a limiting factor.
This is true because the muscles would not be able to take any more oxygen.Hence a factor other than the amount of oxygen could play a part.

OA ?

User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 532
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:39 pm
Location: Barcelona
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:640

by hk » Thu Jun 25, 2009 10:06 am
raghavsarathy wrote:IMO D. This is because it says that amount of oxygen is not a limiting factor.
This is true because the muscles would not be able to take any more oxygen.Hence a factor other than the amount of oxygen could play a part.

OA ?
raghav,

Be very careful with such questions.. Although statement D does a fine job of weakening the conclusion, it does not play the same role as the boldface statement.

The boldface statement weakens the argument by directly challenging "how Superoxy is not going to help with the oxygen intake." This is what you should be looking for!!! A statement that answers this question.

I still stay with C!!!
Wanna know what I'm upto? Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/harikrish

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:41 pm
Thanked: 9 times
GMAT Score:770

by raghavsarathy » Fri Jun 26, 2009 1:12 am
Hari
I agree with you.. I missed the point in C.. Ans should be C ! Thanks

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:11 pm
Location: NYC
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:720

D

by n_niaz » Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:07 am
raghavsarathy wrote:IMO D. This is because it says that amount of oxygen is not a limiting factor.
This is true because the muscles would not be able to take any more oxygen.Hence a factor other than the amount of oxygen could play a part.

OA ?
I agree answer should be D - It is basically reinstating the point in the bold statement that additional oxygen really won't make a difference.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:02 pm
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:3 members

by turbo jet » Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:53 am
IMO: C

Focus of BF: O2 is useless for improving physical performance
Focus of C: O2 in bloodstream helps improve physical performance. Water cannot provide that. Only lungs can.

Focus of D:It is assuming that O2 in H20 is responsible for improving physical performance . It is weakening my conclusion.

What is my conclusion: O2 in H2O DOES NOT HELP IN IMPROVING PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE.

If BF strengthens my conclusion, answer should also strengthen conclusion. However D is weakening conclusion.

Cheers
TJ
Life is Tom; I am Jerry ;)

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:00 am
Thanked: 6 times

by anksgupta » Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:26 am
OA is indeed C. Thanks everybody
Live n Love GMAT

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:07 am

by micheal_kr » Sun May 15, 2016 10:59 pm
In my opinion B is the most logical one.