3. However much United States voters may agree that there is waste in government and that the government as a whole spends beyond its means, it is difficult to find broad support for a movement toward a minimal state.
A) However much United States voters may agree that
B) Despite the agreemnt among United States voters to the fact
C) Although United States voters agree
D) Even though United States voters may agree
E) There is agreement among United States voters that
Answer: A
- After reading the question my first reaction was that you can count the number of voters in the United States and therefore, MUCH is incorrect (correction should be MANY). As a result, I crossed out 'A' as a possible answer.
- My answer was E) because it is parallel to the subordinate clause THATthe government...
Can someone please clarify why 'A' is the answer? Thanks.
OG Verbal Review 2nd Edition: SC #3 pg.270
This topic has expert replies
- avik.ch
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:15 am
- Thanked: 149 times
- Followed by:32 members
- GMAT Score:760
yes, the voters can be counted but here "much" is not telling about the number of voters - "much" is referring to the extent the voters may agree and so this is uncountable.kwah wrote: - After reading the question my first reaction was that you can count the number of voters in the United States and therefore, MUCH is incorrect (correction should be MANY). As a result, I crossed out 'A' as a possible answer.
- My answer was E) because it is parallel to the subordinate clause THATthe government...
Can someone please clarify why 'A' is the answer? Thanks.
Consider this :
Many voters agree to vote for Mr.X --- you are referring to this case. But here the meaning is different.
The parallel structure : that ... that is also applicable for A.
Hope this helps !!
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2789
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
- Location: Chennai, India
- Thanked: 206 times
- Followed by:43 members
- GMAT Score:640
However much United States voters may agree that there is waste in government and that the government as a whole spends beyond its means, it is difficult to find broad support for a movement toward a minimal state.
A) However much United States voters may agree that - Parallel and better construction
B) Despite the agreement among United States voters to the fact - Not parallel
C) Although United States voters agree - Not parallel
D) Even though United States voters may agree - Not parallel
E) There is agreement among United States voters that - Awkward
IMO: A
A) However much United States voters may agree that - Parallel and better construction
B) Despite the agreement among United States voters to the fact - Not parallel
C) Although United States voters agree - Not parallel
D) Even though United States voters may agree - Not parallel
E) There is agreement among United States voters that - Awkward
IMO: A
I would follow the MGMAT approach, which would make life easier by eliminating choices and leaving you with less options.avik.ch wrote:yes, the voters can be counted but here "much" is not telling about the number of voters - "much" is referring to the extent the voters may agree and so this is uncountable.kwah wrote: - After reading the question my first reaction was that you can count the number of voters in the United States and therefore, MUCH is incorrect (correction should be MANY). As a result, I crossed out 'A' as a possible answer.
- My answer was E) because it is parallel to the subordinate clause THATthe government...
Can someone please clarify why 'A' is the answer? Thanks.
Consider this :
Many voters agree to vote for Mr.X --- you are referring to this case. But here the meaning is different.
The parallel structure : that ... that is also applicable for A.
Hope this helps !!
The original sentence contains 'may agree'. Much describes the degree to which the voters agree and not the voters in number.'agree' should be followed by 'that' to introduce the clause.
A) agree is followed by 'that', and meaning and construction of sentence is correct.
B) may is missing in the sentence and fact should have 'that' after it.
C) 'may' and 'that' missing
D) 'that' is missing
E) The two clauses separated by Comma can stand independently. It means that both the clauses have a main subject and a verb. And therefore a conjunction is needed to join them. Moreover the sentence tries to convey a paradox. Therefore 'even though/however/although/Contrary' words are more apt.
Seeking Redemption
- avik.ch
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:15 am
- Thanked: 149 times
- Followed by:32 members
- GMAT Score:760
This is exactly what I wrote in the above post. Anyway, I am not sure what approach you are talking about. Can you please explain in details.ank_1 wrote: I would follow the MGMAT approach, which would make life easier by eliminating choices and leaving you with less options.
The original sentence contains 'may agree'. Much describes the degree to which the voters agree and not the voters in number.'agree' should be followed by 'that' to introduce the clause..
No, "agree" is not always followed by that.ank_1 wrote:A) agree is followed by 'that', and meaning and construction of sentence is correct..
agree to, agree with, agree that....all are accepted idioms.
The major error in E : The meaning is changed : here it refers that there is a agreement among voters -- the original one doesnt imply this.
Hope this helps !!
The approach is to identify the error and then compare the answer choices, and split them into contenders and losers. So based on this approach you can split the answer choices into A,D(contenders) and B, C and E(losers).
I said 'that' is necessary to introduce a clause after agree. I never said 'that' should always follow the word 'agree' My bad, maybe i could not articulate it well.
For 'agree' to be followed by 'with' and 'to' would require a person or an idea.
I said 'that' is necessary to introduce a clause after agree. I never said 'that' should always follow the word 'agree' My bad, maybe i could not articulate it well.
For 'agree' to be followed by 'with' and 'to' would require a person or an idea.
Seeking Redemption
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Focus on the meaning.kwah wrote:3. However much United States voters may agree that there is waste in government and that the government as a whole spends beyond its means, it is difficult to find broad support for a movement toward a minimal state.
A) However much United States voters may agree that
B) Despite the agreemnt among United States voters to the fact
C) Although United States voters agree
D) Even though United States voters may agree
E) There is agreement among United States voters that
Answer: A
- After reading the question my first reaction was that you can count the number of voters in the United States and therefore, MUCH is incorrect (correction should be MANY). As a result, I crossed out 'A' as a possible answer.
- My answer was E) because it is parallel to the subordinate clause THATthe government...
Can someone please clarify why 'A' is the answer? Thanks.
However MUCH United States voters MAY AGREE means that there MIGHT BE MUCH agreement.
B, C and E all change the intended meaning by implying that there IS -- for CERTAIN -- agreement. Eliminate B, C and E.
In D, may agree THERE is waste...and THAT the government as a whole spends is not parallel. Eliminate D.
The correct answer is A.
E also can be eliminated because it connects two complete sentences with a comma:
There is agreement among United States voters that there is waste in government and that the government as a whole spends beyond its means.
It is difficult to find broad support for a movement toward a minimal state.
If a comma can be replaced with a period, eliminate the answer choice.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3