• Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep

OG - RC Passage1 - Q2

This topic has 2 member replies
fiza gupta Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
31 Jul 2016
Posted:
216 messages
Followed by:
6 members
Thanked:
31 times
Target GMAT Score:
750+

OG - RC Passage1 - Q2

Post Mon Oct 17, 2016 11:46 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions during the 1970s and 1980s raise questions about why firms initiate and consummate such transactions. One study showed, for example, that acquiring firms were on average unable to maintain acquired firms’ pre-merger levels of profitability. A second study concluded that postacquisition gains to most acquiring firms were not adequate to cover the premiums paid to obtain acquired firms. A third demonstrated that, following the announcement of a prospective merger, the stock of the prospective acquiring fi rm tends to increase in value much less than does that of the firm for which it bids. Yet mergers and acquisitions remain common, and bidders continue to assert that their objectives are economic ones.

    Acquisitions may well have the desirable effect of channeling a nation’s resources efficiently from less to more efficient sectors of its economy, but the individual acquisitions executives arranging these deals must see them as advancing either their own or their companies’ private economic interests. It seems that factors having little to do with corporate economic interests explain acquisitions. These factors may include the incentive compensation of executives, lack of monitoring by boards of directors, and managerial error in estimating the value of firms targeted for acquisition. Alternatively, the acquisition acts of bidders may derive from modeling: a manager does what other managers do.

    Q) According to the passage, during the 1970s and 1980s bidding firms differed from the firms for which they bid in that bidding firms

    (A) tended to be more profitable before a merger than after a merger
    (B) were more often concerned about the impact of acquisitions on national economies
    (C) were run by managers whose actions were modeled on those of other managers
    (D) anticipated greater economic advantages from prospective mergers
    (E) experienced less of an increase in stock value when a prospective merger was

    down to A ad E, but picked A, why A is wrong?
    OA:E

    _________________
    Fiza Gupta

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    Marty Murray Legendary Member
    Joined
    03 Feb 2014
    Posted:
    2037 messages
    Followed by:
    129 members
    Thanked:
    948 times
    GMAT Score:
    800
    Post Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:34 pm
    Perhaps you misinterpreted this statement.

    "acquiring firms were on average unable to maintain acquired firms’ pre-merger levels of profitability."

    The point of that statement is not that after the merger the profits of the bidding firms decreased, but rather that those of the acquired firms decreased.

    _________________
    Marty Murray
    GMAT Coach
    m.w.murray@hotmail.com
    http://infinitemindprep.com/
    In Person in the New York Area and Online Worldwide

    Thanked by: fiza gupta
    fiza gupta Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    31 Jul 2016
    Posted:
    216 messages
    Followed by:
    6 members
    Thanked:
    31 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    750+
    Post Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:08 pm
    Thanku Marty Murray

    _________________
    Fiza Gupta

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 180 topics
    2 lheiannie07 61 topics
    3 Roland2rule 54 topics
    4 ardz24 44 topics
    5 VJesus12 14 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    155 posts
    2 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    105 posts
    3 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    101 posts
    4 image description Jay@ManhattanReview

    Manhattan Review

    82 posts
    5 image description Matt@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    80 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts