• Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider

OG CR:Petrochemical industry officials

This topic has 2 member replies

Top Member

OG CR:Petrochemical industry officials

Post Sat Sep 17, 2016 8:43 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Petrochemical industry officials have said that the extreme pressure exerted on plant managers during the last five years to improve profits by cutting costs has done nothing to impair the industry’s ability to operate safely. However, environmentalists contend that the recent rash of serious oil spills and accidents at petrochemical plants is traceable to cost-cutting measures.

    Which of the following, if true, would provide the strongest support for the position held by industry officials?

    A) The petrochemical industry benefits if accidents do not occur, since accidents involve risk of employee injury as well as loss of equipment and product.
    B) Petrochemical industry unions recently demanded that additional money be spent on safety and environment protection measures, but the unions readily abandoned those demands in exchange for job security.
    C) Despite major cutbacks in most other areas of operation, the petrochemical industry has devoted more of its resources to environmental and safety measures in the last five years than in the preceding five years.
    D) There is evidence that the most damaging of the recent oil spills would have been prevented had cost-cutting measures not been instituted.
    E) Both the large fines and adverse publicity generated by the most recent oil spills have prompted the petrochemical industry to increase the resources devoted to oil-spill prevention.

    OA:C

    OG 2017 New Question

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!

    Top Member

    Post Tue Feb 28, 2017 5:52 pm
    Bumping the thread for the experts review.

    crackverbal Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    16 Aug 2010
    Posted:
    157 messages
    Followed by:
    2 members
    Thanked:
    65 times
    Post Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:48 pm
    Simplify the argument -

    Industry officials
    Cutting costs to improve profits--> No impact on safety

    Environmentalists
    Cutting costs --> oil spills and accidents --> negative impact on safety.

    We are asked to strengthen the industry officials' argument.

    Option A - Incorrect.
    this option says
    No accidents --> No losses due to damage to equipment and employees.
    This option does not make it clear why cost cutting measures had little to no impact on safety.

    Option B - Incorrect.
    this kind of weakens the argument. if they abandoned their demands for additional safety measures, probably that had a negative impact on safety.

    Option C - Correct.
    Gives a reason to say why the cost cutting measures had no impact on safety. Because, they did not impact spending on safety measures.

    Option D - Incorrect.
    Weakens the argument.

    Option E - Incorrect.
    Note that we are talking about the impact of cost-cutting measures implemented in the last 5 years. The new measures taken to improve safety have no impact on that. Hence, not relevant.

    _________________
    For sentence correction videos check here -
    http://gmatonline.crackverbal.com/p/gmat-sentence-correction

    Learn all PS and DS strategies here-
    http://gmatonline.crackverbal.com/p/mastering-quant-on-gmat

    For more info on GMAT and MBA, follow us on @AskCrackVerbal

    Thanked by: Anaira Mitch

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 180 topics
    2 lheiannie07 65 topics
    3 Roland2rule 49 topics
    4 ardz24 40 topics
    5 LUANDATO 16 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    146 posts
    2 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    103 posts
    3 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    100 posts
    4 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    92 posts
    5 image description Jay@ManhattanReview

    Manhattan Review

    79 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts