Number N is randomly selected from a set of consecutive integers between 50 and 69, inclusive. What is the probability that N will have the same number of factors as 89?
a) 1/2
b 1/5
c) 0
d) 1/3
e) 1/4
Pleas help with this problem.
Target Test Prep is 20% off right now!
Use code FLASH20
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
Number N is randomly selected from a set of consecutive inte
This topic has expert replies
-
Anaira Mitch
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:21 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:5 members
-
DavidG@VeritasPrep
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
- Location: Boston, MA
- Thanked: 1153 times
- Followed by:128 members
- GMAT Score:770
Total: We know there are 20 integers between 50 and 69 inclusive, so that's our total.Anaira Mitch wrote:Number N is randomly selected from a set of consecutive integers between 50 and 69, inclusive. What is the probability that N will have the same number of factors as 89?
a) 1/2
b 1/5
c) 0
d) 1/3
e) 1/4
Pleas help with this problem.
Desired: 89 has 2 factors, 1 and itself. So we're looking for all the numbers in this range that have 2 factors. Put another way, we're looking for the number of primes. Let's list them out. 53, 59, 61, 67. There are 4 prime integers between 50 and 69.
4/20 = 1/5. The answer is B
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
Jay@ManhattanReview
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3008
- Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2016 6:19 am
- Location: Grand Central / New York
- Thanked: 470 times
- Followed by:34 members
We see that 89 is a prime number and thus have only two factors: 1 and 89.Anaira Mitch wrote:Number N is randomly selected from a set of consecutive integers between 50 and 69, inclusive. What is the probability that N will have the same number of factors as 89?
a) 1/2
b 1/5
c) 0
d) 1/3
e) 1/4
Pleas help with this problem.
Each prime number has two factors: 1 and the number itself. Thus, ONLY the prime numbers between 50 and 69, inclusive, will also have only two factors.
Let us understand how to be sure that whether a number is prime or not.
Step 1: Take a number. Say, N = 53.
Step 2: Take the root of the number, thus n = square root of N = √N. n = √53 = ~7...
Step 3: Note the prime numbers less than n. n = 7, thus prime numbers < 7... are: 2, 3, 5, and 7.
Step 4: Divide the number, N by each of the prime numbers noted in Step 3. If the number, N is divisible by any of the prime numbers, the number is non-prime, else a prime. Since n = 53 is not divisible by 2, 3, 5, or 7, 53 is prime.
There are four prime numbers between 50 and 69 inclusive: 53, 59, 61, and 67, and there are 20 integers between 50 and 69 inclusive.
Thus, the probability of choosing a prime number out of 20 numbers = 4/20 = 1/5.
Answer: B.
Hope this helps!
-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GMAT Prep
Locations: New York | Jakarta | Nanjing | Berlin | and many more...
Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
Jeff@TargetTestPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2015 9:34 am
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 39 times
- Followed by:22 members
The solution to this problem is straightforward if you know your prime numbers.Anaira Mitch wrote:Number N is randomly selected from a set of consecutive integers between 50 and 69, inclusive. What is the probability that N will have the same number of factors as 89?
a) 1/2
b 1/5
c) 0
d) 1/3
e) 1/4
We need to determine the probability that a number when randomly selected from the set of integers between 50 and 69 inclusive will have the same number of factors as 89. Since 89 is prime (89 has only two factors), we need to determine the number of prime numbers between 50 and 69, inclusive. The prime numbers between 50 and 69, inclusive, are:
53, 57, 61, 67
We also know that there are 69 - 50 + 1 = 20 integers from 50 to 69, inclusive; thus, the probability that N will have the same number of factors as 89 is 4/20 = 1/5.
Answer: B
Jeffrey Miller
Head of GMAT Instruction
[email protected]
See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
[email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi Anaira Mitch,
As several of the other explanations have pointed it, this question becomes considerably easier IF you have your prime numbers memorized. However, if you DON'T have them memorized, you can still get to the correct answer relatively quickly by doing some 'brute force' arithmetic and using the rules of division to avoid a lot of the implied 'math work.'
To start, we need to define how many integers are between 50 and 69, inclusive. This is an example of a 'fence post' problem - and if you recognize that, then you know that there are 69 - 50 + 1 = 20 total numbers. If you don't recognize that though, you can still 'group' the numbers....
50 - 59 = 10 numbers
60 - 69 = another 10 numbers
Total = 20 numbers
Next, we need to figure out the factors of 89. Since the square-root of 89 is less than 10, we just have to consider single-digit divisors... Since 89 is ODD, it's not divisible by any EVEN integers. Since it's digits add up to 17, it's not divisible by 3 or 9. Since it ends in a 9, it's not divisible by 5. All that's left is to try 7... which does NOT divide either. Thus, the only factors of 89 are 1 and 89.
After that, we have to determine how many of the 20 numbers have JUST TWO factors.
We can quickly eliminate all of the even numbers (they'll all have at least 4 factors).
We can also eliminate all of the multiples of 5 (they'll also have at least 4 factors).
So we're left with... 51, 53, 57, 59, 61, 63, 67 and 69
We can eliminate 51, 57, 63 and 69 with the 'rule of 3'
Now we're left with 53, 59, 61 and 67
This is 4 of the 20 numbers = 1/5 of the numbers. Based on the answer choices, the correct answer must be either B or C. Once you prove that ANY of those 4 numbers has just 2 factors, then you know what the correct answer must be...
Final Answer: B
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
As several of the other explanations have pointed it, this question becomes considerably easier IF you have your prime numbers memorized. However, if you DON'T have them memorized, you can still get to the correct answer relatively quickly by doing some 'brute force' arithmetic and using the rules of division to avoid a lot of the implied 'math work.'
To start, we need to define how many integers are between 50 and 69, inclusive. This is an example of a 'fence post' problem - and if you recognize that, then you know that there are 69 - 50 + 1 = 20 total numbers. If you don't recognize that though, you can still 'group' the numbers....
50 - 59 = 10 numbers
60 - 69 = another 10 numbers
Total = 20 numbers
Next, we need to figure out the factors of 89. Since the square-root of 89 is less than 10, we just have to consider single-digit divisors... Since 89 is ODD, it's not divisible by any EVEN integers. Since it's digits add up to 17, it's not divisible by 3 or 9. Since it ends in a 9, it's not divisible by 5. All that's left is to try 7... which does NOT divide either. Thus, the only factors of 89 are 1 and 89.
After that, we have to determine how many of the 20 numbers have JUST TWO factors.
We can quickly eliminate all of the even numbers (they'll all have at least 4 factors).
We can also eliminate all of the multiples of 5 (they'll also have at least 4 factors).
So we're left with... 51, 53, 57, 59, 61, 63, 67 and 69
We can eliminate 51, 57, 63 and 69 with the 'rule of 3'
Now we're left with 53, 59, 61 and 67
This is 4 of the 20 numbers = 1/5 of the numbers. Based on the answer choices, the correct answer must be either B or C. Once you prove that ANY of those 4 numbers has just 2 factors, then you know what the correct answer must be...
Final Answer: B
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
-
Matt@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
Once you know that you're looking for primes, you're left with the problem of determining whether some numbers in a given range are prime.
A nice trick for eliminating the bulk of them is to look for multiples of possible prime factors of those numbers. When considering numbers from 50 to 69, we only need to consider the possible prime factors 2, 3, 5, and 7. Any even number will divide by 2 and anything that ends in 5 will divide by 5, so we're left with:
51, 53, 57, 59, 61, 63, 67, 69
We start by eliminating multiples of 3, leaving
53, 59, 61, 67
Then we look for multiples of 7, of which are there are none remaining. So we've got FOUR primes in range, out of the 20 numbers in the set, giving us 4/20, or 1/5.
A nice trick for eliminating the bulk of them is to look for multiples of possible prime factors of those numbers. When considering numbers from 50 to 69, we only need to consider the possible prime factors 2, 3, 5, and 7. Any even number will divide by 2 and anything that ends in 5 will divide by 5, so we're left with:
51, 53, 57, 59, 61, 63, 67, 69
We start by eliminating multiples of 3, leaving
53, 59, 61, 67
Then we look for multiples of 7, of which are there are none remaining. So we've got FOUR primes in range, out of the 20 numbers in the set, giving us 4/20, or 1/5.
-
Matt@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
You might also ask why I didn't consider any larger primes, such as 11, 13, ...
When testing whether a number is prime, start by thinking about its possible factors. A friendly number like 64 helps illustrate. If I think of 64 as the product of two of its factors, I get a number of possibilities:
1 * 64
2 * 32
4 * 16
8 * 8
Notice how ONE of the two numbers in the pair is always less than or equal to the square root of 64? This will be true of any integer: if it has other factors between 1 and itself, at least one of those factors must be less than or equal to the number's square root.
Since the largest term in our set is 69, we can use √69, or ≈ 8 as a guide. If a positive integer less than 69 has some other factors, one of those factors MUST be less than ≈ 8. So we only need to consider 2, 3, 5, and 7.
When testing whether a number is prime, start by thinking about its possible factors. A friendly number like 64 helps illustrate. If I think of 64 as the product of two of its factors, I get a number of possibilities:
1 * 64
2 * 32
4 * 16
8 * 8
Notice how ONE of the two numbers in the pair is always less than or equal to the square root of 64? This will be true of any integer: if it has other factors between 1 and itself, at least one of those factors must be less than or equal to the number's square root.
Since the largest term in our set is 69, we can use √69, or ≈ 8 as a guide. If a positive integer less than 69 has some other factors, one of those factors MUST be less than ≈ 8. So we only need to consider 2, 3, 5, and 7.
