Please refer to the image. Thanks.
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
GMATPrep5
This topic has expert replies
-
akhilsuhag
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 10:25 pm
- Thanked: 57 times
- Followed by:4 members
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
[email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi akhilsuhag,
For this CR question, we're asked to find an answer that EXPLAINS the given situation.
We're told:
1) NEW solar power plants are cheaper (due to tech improvements and reduced equipment costs) and converting solar energy into electricity is far more cost-efficient than before.
2) The threshold to choose NEW solar power PLANTS instead of NEW oil-fired PLANTS is UNCHANGED (the 35 dollars isn't really relevant; what IS relevant is that it's the same as it was before).
So, we need an answer that accounts for the fact that new solar power PLANTS are cheaper than ever before BUT new solar power isn't any more economically viable than before... In other words, how can the threshold stay the same if it's now cheaper to produce solar power???
As a prediction, the only thing that I can think of is that it's now somehow cheaper to produce oil-fired PLANTS TOO.
Which answer states that? C
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
For this CR question, we're asked to find an answer that EXPLAINS the given situation.
We're told:
1) NEW solar power plants are cheaper (due to tech improvements and reduced equipment costs) and converting solar energy into electricity is far more cost-efficient than before.
2) The threshold to choose NEW solar power PLANTS instead of NEW oil-fired PLANTS is UNCHANGED (the 35 dollars isn't really relevant; what IS relevant is that it's the same as it was before).
So, we need an answer that accounts for the fact that new solar power PLANTS are cheaper than ever before BUT new solar power isn't any more economically viable than before... In other words, how can the threshold stay the same if it's now cheaper to produce solar power???
As a prediction, the only thing that I can think of is that it's now somehow cheaper to produce oil-fired PLANTS TOO.
Which answer states that? C
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
-
akhilsuhag
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 10:25 pm
- Thanked: 57 times
- Followed by:4 members
Hey Rich,
Thanks for replying.I was fairly confused between A and C in this one. A says Oil prices crashed- which would that not have a similar effect?
Just wanted to know why not A.
Thanks for replying.I was fairly confused between A and C in this one. A says Oil prices crashed- which would that not have a similar effect?
Just wanted to know why not A.
Please press "thanks" if you think my post has helped you.. Cheers!!
While i don't think answer is A, I don't think it is still 'C' either. Because the statement says that new technology has made solar to electricity 'COST EFFICIENT'. Answer choice C states that EFFICIENCY of oil powered plants has increased. Is this Cost efficiency, transmission efficiency. We can assume that all efficiencies lead to cost efficiency.
Option E rather leads to very long assumption. Increased cost - promotes further exploration - increases supply - leads to price crash. Just like current oil prices. This may be another way of stating A.
A has a problem. Even though oil prices have fallen, we don't know whether other costs such as labour, materials etc have increased so that threshold remains high.
Option E rather leads to very long assumption. Increased cost - promotes further exploration - increases supply - leads to price crash. Just like current oil prices. This may be another way of stating A.
A has a problem. Even though oil prices have fallen, we don't know whether other costs such as labour, materials etc have increased so that threshold remains high.
The choices are definitely narrowed down to A) and C). The problem arises in choosing which among st the two.
------------
Lets have a look at
A) The prices have fallen dramatically - For this to happen, means, that oil has become cheaper than it already was (it is cheaper than solar energy) - But none of the statements made in the argument point us towards the dropping price of oil.
C) Now, it becomes easier to choose C) via elimination. If one has eliminated A) the choice is obviously C). But if we think about it - The argument says the threshold economic viability between solar power and oil remains unchanged. This can mean the amount of energy generated by solar energy isn't useful enough even though cost of production/conversion has reduced. On the other hand, the word 'New' is a clue. 'New oil fired plants' which means these new ones are more efficient for some reason, one of them can be Technological Advances. So if one is confused about A). Thinking about C) this way can bring us closer to the answer as well
So, Answer is C.
I hope this helps.
------------
Lets have a look at
A) The prices have fallen dramatically - For this to happen, means, that oil has become cheaper than it already was (it is cheaper than solar energy) - But none of the statements made in the argument point us towards the dropping price of oil.
C) Now, it becomes easier to choose C) via elimination. If one has eliminated A) the choice is obviously C). But if we think about it - The argument says the threshold economic viability between solar power and oil remains unchanged. This can mean the amount of energy generated by solar energy isn't useful enough even though cost of production/conversion has reduced. On the other hand, the word 'New' is a clue. 'New oil fired plants' which means these new ones are more efficient for some reason, one of them can be Technological Advances. So if one is confused about A). Thinking about C) this way can bring us closer to the answer as well
So, Answer is C.
I hope this helps.
