• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to \$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions
25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

## Non functioning satellites

tagged by:

This topic has 13 member replies
chidcguy Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
12 Feb 2007
Posted:
438 messages
Upvotes:
26

#### Non functioning satellites

Wed Jun 11, 2008 7:11 pm
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?
Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth is small compared to the number of small pieces of debris in orbit, the large satellites interfere more seriously with telescope observations because of the strong reflections they produce. Because many of those large satellites have ceased to function, the proposal has recently been made to eliminate interference from nonfunctioning satellites by exploding them in space.
This proposal, however, is ill conceived, since _______.

A. many nonfunctioning satellites remain in orbit for years
B. for satellites that have ceased to function, repairing them while they are in orbit would be prohibitively expensive
C. there are no known previous instances of satellites' having been exploded on purpose
D. the only way to make telescope observations without any interference from debris in orbit is to use telescopes launched into extremely high orbits around the Earth
E. a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth's orbit would result in a blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations impossible

Thanked by: albertrahul
Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
paddle_sweep Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
07 Apr 2010
Posted:
379 messages
Upvotes:
3
Target GMAT Score:
720
Top Reply
Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:22 pm
What is the source? I don't agree with the OA?

ov25 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
10 Jul 2010
Posted:
201 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Upvotes:
7
Top Reply
Mon Sep 27, 2010 9:30 am
Quote:
Could you be more elaborate? The argument talks about eliminating intereference from non functioning satellites.
The phrase "logically complete" means the answer has to support 100%.

The only way "take the telescopes high"... says there is no other way you could eliminate interference. This option is so strong that this method elminates all other proposals no matter what they are. including the one in the stimulus

paddle_sweep Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
07 Apr 2010
Posted:
379 messages
Upvotes:
3
Target GMAT Score:
720
Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:22 pm
What is the source? I don't agree with the OA?

ov25 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
10 Jul 2010
Posted:
201 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Upvotes:
7
Mon Sep 27, 2010 9:30 am
Quote:
Could you be more elaborate? The argument talks about eliminating intereference from non functioning satellites.
The phrase "logically complete" means the answer has to support 100%.

The only way "take the telescopes high"... says there is no other way you could eliminate interference. This option is so strong that this method elminates all other proposals no matter what they are. including the one in the stimulus

divyeshbatra Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Joined
04 Aug 2014
Posted:
5 messages
Sat Mar 14, 2015 11:44 pm
The OA is E.

diebeatsthegmat Legendary Member
Joined
07 May 2010
Posted:
1119 messages
Followed by:
2 members
Upvotes:
29
Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:40 pm
chidcguy wrote:
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?
Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth is small compared to the number of small pieces of debris in orbit, the large satellites interfere more seriously with telescope observations because of the strong reflections they produce. Because many of those large satellites have ceased to function, the proposal has recently been made to eliminate interference from nonfunctioning satellites by exploding them in space.
This proposal, however, is ill conceived, since _______.

A. many nonfunctioning satellites remain in orbit for years
B. for satellites that have ceased to function, repairing them while they are in orbit would be prohibitively expensive
C. there are no known previous instances of satellites' having been exploded on purpose
D. the only way to make telescope observations without any interference from debris in orbit is to use telescopes launched into extremely high orbits around the Earth
E. a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth's orbit would result in a blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations impossible
the OA is E, if you say the OA is D, maybe you should review....

shovan85 Community Manager
Joined
23 Sep 2010
Posted:
991 messages
Followed by:
24 members
Upvotes:
146
Mon Sep 27, 2010 10:12 pm
The source from where i solved this problem is the OLD SET of GMAT Questions. So I guess the answer is correct. The set says the answer is E.

However,
D says about Interference and Debris
E says about Explosion outcome and reflections

Why to concentrate on eliminating interference as the very first line of the passage says "Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth is small compared to the number of small pieces of debris in orbit, the large satellites interfere more seriously with telescope observations because of the strong reflections they produce."

[/b]

vishalj Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
18 Mar 2007
Posted:
104 messages
Upvotes:
4
Test Date:
01/01/2011
Target GMAT Score:
750
Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:34 pm
I concur with Paddle_Sweep. E is looking more appropriate. This is Fill In The Blank( Assumption) Question.

g000fy MBA Student
Joined
05 Dec 2009
Posted:
113 messages
Upvotes:
1
Test Date:
16 Oct 2010
GMAT Score:
700
Mon Sep 27, 2010 9:23 am
ov25 wrote:
imo D

logically completes-- we need to justify here

D: The only way.....to eliminate the interference (just what you need!)
Could you be more elaborate? The argument talks about eliminating intereference from non functioning satellites.

ov25 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
10 Jul 2010
Posted:
201 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Upvotes:
7
Mon Sep 27, 2010 9:09 am
imo D

logically completes-- we need to justify here

D: The only way.....to eliminate the interference (just what you need!)

shovan85 Community Manager
Joined
23 Sep 2010
Posted:
991 messages
Followed by:
24 members
Upvotes:
146
Mon Sep 27, 2010 5:50 am
Its still E for me.

D does not suffice as it is clearly said the Debris do not cause that much problem but the satellites do because of reflection. If you do not explode them then they are still causing the same problem to the Telescopes irrespective of where the telescopes are placed. The premises clearly say that Satellites are causing problem to telescopic observations.

I am not at all convinced about D. Can any one help me on this?

albertrahul Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
04 Jun 2008
Posted:
83 messages
Upvotes:
4
Thu Jun 12, 2008 7:23 am
Good Question, Thanks for posting.
I also went for E.

After knowing OA I read question more carefully.

durgesh79 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
22 Apr 2008
Posted:
167 messages
Upvotes:
15
Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:33 am
Now if look it again, OA Makes sense. In the question the proposal is to "eliminate" interference. If it was to "reduce" then may be E was a better answer.

chidcguy wrote:
the proposal has recently been made to eliminate interference from nonfunctioning satellites by exploding them in space.
This proposal, however, is ill conceived, since _______.
If D is true, we know the only way to do it is xxxx.......... means exploding satelliets will not eliminate it.

### Best Conversation Starters

1 lheiannie07 116 topics
2 LUANDATO 67 topics
3 swerve 66 topics
4 ardz24 61 topics
5 AAPL 59 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

213 posts
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

177 posts
3 Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

168 posts
4 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

133 posts
5 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

126 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts