New GMAT Prep - RC

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:40 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:700

New GMAT Prep - RC

by sunnyjohn » Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:17 pm
Colonial historian David Allen's intensive study of five communities in seventeenth-century Massachusetts is a model of meticulous scholarship on the detailed microcosmic level, and is convincing up to a point. Allen suggests that much more coherence and direct continuity existed between English and colonial agricultural practices and administrative organization than other historians have suggested. However, he overstates his case with the declaration that he has proved "the remarkable extent to which diversity in New England local institutions was directly imitative of regional differences in the mother country.

Such an assertion ignores critical differences between seventeenth-century England and New England.  First, England was overcrowded and land-hungry; New England was sparsely populated and labor-hungry.  Second, England suffered the normal European rate of mortality; New England, especially in the first generation of English colonists, was virtually free from infectious diseases. Third, England had an all-embracing state church; in New England membership in a church was restricted to the elect. Fourth, a high proportion of English villagers lived under paternalistic resident squires; no such class existed in New England. By narrowing his focus to village institutions and ignoring these critical differences, which studies by Greven, Demos, and Lockridge have shown to be so important, Allen has created a somewhat distorted picture of reality.

Allen's work is a rather extreme example of the "country community" school of seventeenth-century English history whose intemperate excesses in removing all national issues from the history of that period have been exposed by Professor Clive Holmes. What conclusion can be drawn, for example, from Allen's discovery that Puritan clergy who had come to the colonies from East Anglia were one-third to one-half as likely to return to England by 1660 as were Puritan ministers from western and northern England? We are not told in what way, if at all, this discovery illuminates historical understanding. Studies of local history have enormously expanded our horizons, but it is a mistake for their authors to conclude that village institutions are all that mattered, simply because their functions are all that the records of village institutions reveal.


Q:The passage suggests that Professor Clive Holmes would most likely agree with which of the following statements?

A) An understanding of seventeenth-century English local institutions requires a consideration of national issues.
B) The "country community" school of seventeenth-century English history distorts historical evidence in order to establish continuity between old and new institutions.
C) Most historians distort reality by focusing on national concerns to the exclusion of local concerns.
D) National issues are best understood from the perspective of those at the local level.
E) Local histories of seventeenth-century English villages have contributed little to the understanding of village life.


Q: It can be inferred from the passage that the author of the passage consider Allen's theory(see highlighted text) to be

A) already known to early historians
B) based on logical fallacy
C) improbable but nevertheless convincing
D) an unexplained, isolated fact
E) a new, insightful explanation.

i will provide OA after some useful discussion..!

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:28 am
IMO A, B

1. A becox the passage quotes "Allen's work is a rather extreme example of the "country community" school of seventeenth-century English history whose intemperate excesses in removing all national issues from the history of that period have been exposed by Professor Clive ".

2. B..Used POE
A----Not mentioned in Passage
C---If its convincing ,there is no need for other authors to comment
D--Not mentioned
E..No way!!

SO IMO B .. " By narrowing his focus to village institutions and ignoring these critical differences, which studies by Greven, Demos, and Lockridge have shown to be so important, Allen has created a somewhat distorted picture of reality"

These words reinforce that Allen had some logical issues which he"missed " out to prove his viewpoint.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:40 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:700

by sunnyjohn » Wed Nov 18, 2009 9:53 pm
gmatmachoman wrote:IMO A, B

1. A becox the passage quotes "Allen's work is a rather extreme example of the "country community" school of seventeenth-century English history whose intemperate excesses in removing all national issues from the history of that period have been exposed by Professor Clive ".

Great point...Thanks... OA: A

2. B..Used POE
A----Not mentioned in Passage
C---If its convincing ,there is no need for other authors to comment
D--Not mentioned
E..No way!!

OA: D - This is killing me.

Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pm
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

by heshamelaziry » Fri Nov 20, 2009 4:00 pm
A
D

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1302
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:13 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 539 times
Followed by:164 members
GMAT Score:800

by Testluv » Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:34 pm
sunnyjohn wrote:
gmatmachoman wrote:IMO A, B

1. A becox the passage quotes "Allen's work is a rather extreme example of the "country community" school of seventeenth-century English history whose intemperate excesses in removing all national issues from the history of that period have been exposed by Professor Clive ".

Great point...Thanks... OA: A

2. B..Used POE
A----Not mentioned in Passage
C---If its convincing ,there is no need for other authors to comment
D--Not mentioned
E..No way!!

OA: D - This is killing me.
Don't use POE.

The second question is asking us what the author thinks of Allen's discovery.

Go back to where "discovery" is mentioned, but read from the beginning of the sentence.

The sentence begins: "What conclusion can be drawn....?"

This is a rhetorical question. The author's answer to his own question (what conclusion can be drawn from Allen's discovery?) is: "who knows?!" OR "no firm conclusion"

So our prediction (coming from the author's own words) is: "no firm conclusion"

Now, hunt for the match.

Then, choice D is correct.

Choice B is wrong because the author does not dispute the accuracy of the discovery. Instead, he points out that no firm conclusion can be drawn from it, and so it is unclear how it contributes to historical understanding.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto

Legendary Member
Posts: 941
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:28 am
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:1 members

by bhumika.k.shah » Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:34 pm
Hi, is it possible for you to post other questions relating to this RC passage.?
I am guessing there are two more to go...
sunnyjohn wrote:Colonial historian David Allen's intensive study of five communities in seventeenth-century Massachusetts is a model of meticulous scholarship on the detailed microcosmic level, and is convincing up to a point. Allen suggests that much more coherence and direct continuity existed between English and colonial agricultural practices and administrative organization than other historians have suggested. However, he overstates his case with the declaration that he has proved "the remarkable extent to which diversity in New England local institutions was directly imitative of regional differences in the mother country.

Such an assertion ignores critical differences between seventeenth-century England and New England.  First, England was overcrowded and land-hungry; New England was sparsely populated and labor-hungry.  Second, England suffered the normal European rate of mortality; New England, especially in the first generation of English colonists, was virtually free from infectious diseases. Third, England had an all-embracing state church; in New England membership in a church was restricted to the elect. Fourth, a high proportion of English villagers lived under paternalistic resident squires; no such class existed in New England. By narrowing his focus to village institutions and ignoring these critical differences, which studies by Greven, Demos, and Lockridge have shown to be so important, Allen has created a somewhat distorted picture of reality.

Allen's work is a rather extreme example of the "country community" school of seventeenth-century English history whose intemperate excesses in removing all national issues from the history of that period have been exposed by Professor Clive Holmes. What conclusion can be drawn, for example, from Allen's discovery that Puritan clergy who had come to the colonies from East Anglia were one-third to one-half as likely to return to England by 1660 as were Puritan ministers from western and northern England? We are not told in what way, if at all, this discovery illuminates historical understanding. Studies of local history have enormously expanded our horizons, but it is a mistake for their authors to conclude that village institutions are all that mattered, simply because their functions are all that the records of village institutions reveal.


Q:The passage suggests that Professor Clive Holmes would most likely agree with which of the following statements?

A) An understanding of seventeenth-century English local institutions requires a consideration of national issues.
B) The "country community" school of seventeenth-century English history distorts historical evidence in order to establish continuity between old and new institutions.
C) Most historians distort reality by focusing on national concerns to the exclusion of local concerns.
D) National issues are best understood from the perspective of those at the local level.
E) Local histories of seventeenth-century English villages have contributed little to the understanding of village life.


Q: It can be inferred from the passage that the author of the passage consider Allen's theory(see highlighted text) to be

A) already known to early historians
B) based on logical fallacy
C) improbable but nevertheless convincing
D) an unexplained, isolated fact
E) a new, insightful explanation.

i will provide OA after some useful discussion..!

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 355
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:42 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by vineetbatra » Mon May 10, 2010 9:58 am
According to the passage, which of the following was true of most villages in seventeenth-century England?

(A) The resident squire had significant authority.
(B) Church members were selected on the basis of their social status within the community.
(C) Low population density restricted agricultural and economic growth.
(D) There was little diversity in local institutions from one region to another.
(E) National events had little impact on local customs and administrative organization.


Testluv, there is another question in this passage that I couldn't solve. In this the answer is A. But I did not know the meaning of Paternalistic or Squire. So how to best answer such a question that is based on the meaning of a word that neither I know nor explained in the passage?

Vineet

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1302
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:13 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 539 times
Followed by:164 members
GMAT Score:800

by Testluv » Mon May 10, 2010 8:49 pm
Hi vineet,

there are some words that count as "field-specific" jargon, and you are not expected to know their meaning; for example, "ACT neurons". Normally, either you don't need to know these words' meanings or else you can ascertain the meaning from surrounding text.

There are other words that count as "vocabulary an MBA student should be expected to know". "Paternalitic" falls into this cateogory. But even for these words, you should not worry too much. It is very unlikely that you will need to know what a specific word means in order to answer any question.

If you come across a word whose meaning you are unfamiliar with, don't worry about what it might mean; instead, focus on the bigger ideas in the passage. (If you really think it is important for you to know what the word means, then try to infer its meaning from surrounding text. But you should only do that in the unlikely scenario that a particular question demands that you know what the word means).

In this case, we definitely could have answered the question without knowing what the word "paternalistic" means. And, we certainly did not need to know what a "squire" was. The relevant sentence from the passage has another clue:
Fourth, a high proportion of English villagers lived under paternalistic resident squires


So, many villagers in England lived "under" squires (whoever "squires" were!).

This is enough to see that choice A must be correct. (As it is very unlikely that the author meant that villagers lived literally "under" squires!)
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 355
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:42 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by vineetbatra » Tue May 11, 2010 3:21 am
Thanks Testluv.

Vineet

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 7:43 am

by gmat_for_life » Sun Jun 26, 2016 7:11 pm
There are additional questions linked to this passage. Would really appreciate if somebody could help me out with the below question.

17. According to the passage, which of the following was true of most villages in seventeenth-century England?
(A) The resident squire had significant authority.
(B) Church members were selected on the basis of their social status within the community.
(C) Low population density restricted agricultural and economic growth.
(D) There was little diversity in local institutions from one region to another.
(E) National events had little impact on local customs and administrative organization.

[spoiler]
The OA to this question is A. However does the sentence 'Fourth, a high proportion of English villagers lived under paternalistic resident squires; no such class existed in New England.' suggest that the resident squire had 'significant authority'? Please help.[/spoiler]

Regards
Amit

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 10:09 am
Location: CA, USA

by elisabethcamaur01 » Mon Jul 18, 2016 10:18 am
Elisabeth Camaur founded Camaur Crampton Family Law as a resource to help clients through divorce and child custody turmoil with a focus on the future. "Instead of regretfully looking back and affixing blame, I like to look forward. I like to turn divorce into an opportunity to change people's lives for the better," says family law attorney Elisabeth Camaur.