| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ildude02 GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 13 Jan 2008 Posts: 307
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 6 times in 6 posts
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:05 pm Post subject: Need help with negative inequality |
|
|
If x is an integer, what's the value of X?
1)1/5 < 1/(x+1) < 1/2
2)(x-3)(x-4) = 0;
I have solved this question to find the answer, but I have a question with regards to how I solved statement 1 and wanted to hear your thoughts.
For statement 1, (x+1) can either be positve or negative, so if (x+1) is postive, we dont need to worry abt the reversing the inequalities, so we get, 1 < x < 4;
When we consider (x+1) being negative, this is where I wanted to get your input;
Can we just substitue (x+1) with -(x+1) and try to solve the inequality? as in; 1/5 < 1/-(x+1) < 1/2 . Is that OK? Or, do we need to reverse the inequality and leave the (x+1) as in; 1/5 > 1/(x+1) > 1/2; Solving both the possibilites obviously give different values. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
wilderness Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 15 Mar 2008 Posts: 94
Thanks given: 23 Thanked 4 times in 4 posts
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 3:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I think we do not need to take -ve into consideration for (1) because it says 1/(x+1) is between 1/5 and 1/2 i.e 1/(x+1) is between 0.2 and 0.5. So its not negative.
IMHO the best way to solve 1 is just invert the equations and change the signs (Is there any rule that forbids us from doing so ?? )
Then we have simply 5 > (x+1) > 2
hence 4 > x > 1
The answer is C. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ian Stewart GMAT Instructor
Joined: 02 Jun 2008 Posts: 605
Thanks given: 1 Thanked 110 times in 103 posts
Location: London GMAT Score: 780
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 6:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| wilderness wrote: |
IMHO the best way to solve 1 is just invert the equations and change the signs (Is there any rule that forbids us from doing so ?? ) . |
You can certainly do this if you know everything is positive. If x and y are positive, and you have the inequality:
1/x < 1/y
then you can multiply both sides by xy to get:
y < x
We don't need to worry about whether to reverse the inequality, provided we know that x and y are both positive. The same is true if x and y are both negative: then xy is positive, so we can multiply by xy without reversing the inequality. You do need to be careful, however, when x and y have opposite signs. Then, when you multiply by xy, you are multiplying by a negative, and you must reverse the inequality. If, say:
1/x < 1/y
then x could be negative, and y positive, and we have, multiplying by xy and reversing the inequality:
y > x
So yes, there is a rule one can follow here- but you need to be very careful if you don't know the signs of x and y. _________________ co-founder, www.gmatix.com
currently available:
-free international directory of private GMAT tutors and MBA Admissions Consultants
-more soon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
 |
wilderness Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 15 Mar 2008 Posts: 94
Thanks given: 23 Thanked 4 times in 4 posts
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks. You just keep amazing me with your tips. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ildude02 GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 13 Jan 2008 Posts: 307
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 6 times in 6 posts
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
I missed it, you are gith that we dont need to consider (x+1) < 0 since it will not satify the given inequality. Thanks.
But my main question was, if we do need to consider one, can we just substitue the variable x+1 with -(x+1) and continue solving the inequality to find the upper an dtjhe lower limit? Appreciate your response.
| wilderness wrote: | Hi,
I think we do not need to take -ve into consideration for (1) because it says 1/(x+1) is between 1/5 and 1/2 i.e 1/(x+1) is between 0.2 and 0.5. So its not negative.
IMHO the best way to solve 1 is just invert the equations and change the signs (Is there any rule that forbids us from doing so ?? )
Then we have simply 5 > (x+1) > 2
hence 4 > x > 1
The answer is C. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
AleksandrM GMAT Destroyer!

Joined: 04 Jan 2008 Posts: 475
Thanks given: 11 Thanked 17 times in 17 posts
Location: Philadelphia Test Date: September 8, 2008 Target GMAT Score: 650
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hey, I ended up with:
1) 10/(x + 1) - 5 < 0
2) x = 3 x = 4
Both: If x = 4, then 1) does not hold true. If x = 3, then 1 holds true.
And so I went with C.
Is my approach correct? _________________ http://second-lap.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jay2007 Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 02 Jul 2007 Posts: 50
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Solving the first in equality i get the values of x as 3 or 4
1/5 < 1/(x+1) means, x=1,2,3,4,0
1/(x+1) < 1/2 means, x=3,4,5,..... or -2, -3, -4....
So, x should be 3 or 4
Solving the second equation i get the values of x as 3 or 4.
So, my answer is E.
What is the OA? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AleksandrM GMAT Destroyer!

Joined: 04 Jan 2008 Posts: 475
Thanks given: 11 Thanked 17 times in 17 posts
Location: Philadelphia Test Date: September 8, 2008 Target GMAT Score: 650
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
jay,
For the first one, you cannot cross-multiply because you do not know the sign of x, therefore you do not know whether to "flip" the inequality sign or not. _________________ http://second-lap.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zakir Just gettin' started!
Joined: 08 Jul 2008 Posts: 2
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would do this as-
From 1st equation:
(x+1)<5, so x <4>2, so x>1
x can be either 2 or 3
From 2nd equation:
x=3, or x=4
Combining 1st and 2nd, x=3.
So the correct answer is C.
(x is not negative, as that would make 1st equation untrue) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lunarpower GMAT Instructor

Joined: 03 Mar 2008 Posts: 361
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 29 times in 29 posts
GMAT Score: 800
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| AleksandrM wrote: | Hey, I ended up with:
1) 10/(x + 1) - 5 < 0
2) x = 3 x = 4
Both: If x = 4, then 1) does not hold true. If x = 3, then 1 holds true.
And so I went with C.
Is my approach correct? |
nope; you left off the left side of the double inequality in statement 1. your version (10/(x+1) - 5 < 0) is a rearrangement of 1/(x+1) < 1/2; you've completely neglected the fact that, per the original problem statement, 1/(x+1) is also greater than 1/5.
this observation totally changes the game, because a number that's stuck between 1/5 and 1/2 must be positive; with just the listed half of the inequality, you can't determine whether 1/(x+1) is positive or negative.
because everything in the double inequality is positive, you can just go ahead and take reciprocals of everything. (RULE: if everything is positive or everything is negative, you can take reciprocals of everything and flip all the inequality signs around.)
this yields 5 > x+1 > 2, or, more traditionally, 2 < x+1 < 5.
therefore, 1 < x < 4.
your rephrase of (2) is correct.
therefore, the answer is still c, although not quite for the reasons you've listed. _________________ ron purewal
instructor, mgmat
Learn more about me |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
"GMAT" and other GMAC™ trademarks are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council™. The Graduate Management Admission Council™ does not endorse, nor is it affiliated in any way with the owner or any content on this website. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the author or those of the members of this website. Copyright © 2008 BTG Test Prep, LLC. Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group.
|
|