Free GMAT Flashcards available for download!

Need explanation of a question


 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Beat The GMAT Forum Index -> GMAT Verbal & Essays -> Reading Comprehension
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sandeep_chhabra
Rising GMAT Star


Joined: 01 Feb 2008
Posts: 73

Thanks given: 1
Thanked 1 times in 1 posts

Location: India
Test Date: 22nd May 2008
Target GMAT Score: 650

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 4:39 am    Post subject: Need explanation of a question Reply with quote

The author's assertion that job evaluation is a justifiable technique for comparing dissimilar jobs is qualified by an admission that

<options>


I am not able to understand what the question is asking. Bit confused by it language. Can anyone please guide.

thanks
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
arunmmw
Rising GMAT Star


Joined: 16 Dec 2007
Posts: 43

Thanks given: 1
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts

Location: Chennai
Test Date: 15-7-2008
Target GMAT Score: 720

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 2008 9:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

in simple words, author's assertion (on job evaluation....) is supported by which of the following options,
_________________
Regards
Arun
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor


Joined: 27 Dec 2006
Posts: 1262

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 95 times in 85 posts

Location: Bay Area, California
GMAT Score: 770

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not quite. "Author's assertion" does refer to some kind of claim the author is making (in this case, that something called "job evaluation" is a useful technique for comparing dissimilar jobs). When we qualify something, though, it means that we're either (a) acknowledging some kind of weakness in our argument or claim, or (b) limiting the scope of our claim (eg, "this only applies to high-tech companies"). (These two things can kind of be seen as the same thing - if you have to limit the scope of your claim, that is a weakness.)

So, in this case, we're being asked to find some kind of limitation or weakness in the author's claim - something that the author actually admits ("admission") in the passage, not something that we just think of on our own.

_________________
Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Corporate Development, Northern California
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Beat The GMAT Forum Index -> GMAT Verbal & Essays -> Reading Comprehension All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



"GMAT" and other GMAC™ trademarks are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council™. The Graduate Management Admission Council™ does not endorse, nor is it affiliated in any way with the owner or any content on this website. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the author or those of the members of this website. Copyright © 2008 BTG Test Prep, LLC. Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group.