'soaring television' SC problem

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:36 pm

by syv11 » Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:19 am
Should be B?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 9:53 am
Thanked: 2 times

by jan08 » Tue Nov 27, 2007 10:14 am
my take is B, here is why:

A. a greater proportion than it was: Negate this choice as it is singular and costs is plural
B. a greater proportion than: seems logical, lets keep this as an option
C. a greater proportion than they have been: need simple past here, negated
D. which is greater than was so: what is which referring to? and so is not idiomatic
E. which is greater than it has been: problem with which..it is singular..need simple past

by POE, B is the choice...OA please?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 215
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Mississippi
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members

by Danielle » Tue Nov 27, 2007 2:34 pm
The answer is B.

A -- it's wrong, but not because costs is plural. 'it' in the phrase refers to the proportion of television costs. Therefore the problem is not agreement, but redundance since the pronoun unnecessarily refers back to a word in the sentence.

B -- it's correct because it eliminates the redundance issue in A.

C-- wrong verb tense

D -- 'which' is wrong

E-- problem with which and wrong verb tense
Verbal Tutor

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 9:53 am
Thanked: 2 times

by jan08 » Tue Nov 27, 2007 2:38 pm
Thanks Danielle..looks like i am coming close :)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 215
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Mississippi
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members

by Danielle » Tue Nov 27, 2007 2:54 pm
you totally are -- keep it up!
Verbal Tutor