GMATGuruNY wrote:
A) SunState attracts more people who move from one state to another when they retire than does any other state.
This answer choice could imply that SunState attracts 30-year old workers who will move to another state when they retire, STRENGTHENING the conclusion that local businesses catering to retirees will be hurt economically.
Eliminate A.
GMATGuruNY -
(1) would you please let me know your thoughts on the below explanation as
another potential reason to eliminate option A ?
I think,one can construe that option A doesn't really affect the argument at hand. Because A could also mean that
even though SunState attracts more retirees from elsewhere than does any other state, still the number of retirees moving to SunState can increase/decrease depending on the corresponding increase/decrease in
the TOTAL number of retirees moving from one state to another.
So,basically it doesn't really affect the CONCLUSION! Does this interpretation stand good ?
Curious to hear from you!
(2) Here, why we're NOT considering the retirees
moving out of Florida ?
Is it because of this SPECIFIC part of the ARGUMENT --
...of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the percentage who retired to Florida... ? Does this portion in
RED seem to imply that we're ONLY concerned with
out of state retirees moving to Florida ?