Should Dr Wade be right, any apparent connection between highly processed foods and excelling at sports is purely coincidental.
Can anybody please explain where is the mistake in the above sentence? Also explain rules related to sentences with the above types (conditional type with SHOULD)?
Dr Wade
This topic has expert replies
- hardik.jadeja
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:12 am
- Thanked: 87 times
- Followed by:5 members
- GMAT Score:730
I think you meant this:
Should Dr Wade be right, any apparent connection between eating highly processed foods and excelling at sports is purely coincidental.
The sentence looks grammatically correct.
I think you are referring to this question:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/prob-with-dr ... 39611.html
If you are interested in knowing the difference between the following two sentences, then refer this link.
https://www.englishforums.com/English/Sh ... w/post.htm
Should Dr Wade be right, any apparent connection between eating highly processed foods and excelling at sports is purely coincidental.
If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection between eating highly processed foods and excelling at sports is purely coincidental.
Hope that helps..
Should Dr Wade be right, any apparent connection between eating highly processed foods and excelling at sports is purely coincidental.
The sentence looks grammatically correct.
I think you are referring to this question:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/prob-with-dr ... 39611.html
If you are interested in knowing the difference between the following two sentences, then refer this link.
https://www.englishforums.com/English/Sh ... w/post.htm
Should Dr Wade be right, any apparent connection between eating highly processed foods and excelling at sports is purely coincidental.
If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection between eating highly processed foods and excelling at sports is purely coincidental.
Hope that helps..
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:23 am
Hi,
I think the correct answer has to be
"Should Dr Wade be right, any apparent connection between highly processed foods and excelling <b>in</b> sports is purely coincidental."
Never heard of "excelling at". Its always "excelling in".
I think the correct answer has to be
"Should Dr Wade be right, any apparent connection between highly processed foods and excelling <b>in</b> sports is purely coincidental."
Never heard of "excelling at". Its always "excelling in".
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 2:55 pm
Hi,
If you check the answer from OG for the choice B, the answer says that Should Dr Wade be right should not be followed by the present indicative verb is. Can someone explain me what the indicative verb should be: will? what is the difference between if-condition clause and should-condition clause?
Thank you very much.
If you check the answer from OG for the choice B, the answer says that Should Dr Wade be right should not be followed by the present indicative verb is. Can someone explain me what the indicative verb should be: will? what is the difference between if-condition clause and should-condition clause?
Thank you very much.