• e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider

major strenghten question doubt(expert reply)

This topic has 1 expert reply and 7 member replies
arghya05 Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
24 Apr 2009
Posted:
81 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Upvotes:
2

major strenghten question doubt(expert reply)

Post Sun Aug 28, 2011 4:21 am
For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from
many tour buses that come to the city. There has been little parking space, so most buses have
idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as
driving. The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses, so
damage to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminish significantly.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument?
A. The exhaust from Palitito's few automobiles isn’t a significant threat to the buildings.
B. Palitito's Renaissance buildings are not threatened by pollution other than engine
exhaust.
C. Tour buses typically spend less than one-quarter of the time they are in Palitito
transporting passengers from one site to another.
D. Most tourists come to Palitito by tour bus than by any other single means of
transportation.
E. Some of the tour buses that are unable to find parking drive around Palitito while their
passengers are visiting a site.


A and B are out of scope why?........................
as with B i can say no other effects contribute to pollution other than exhaust.................
so it is a strengthener

but the main relationship is iddling--------------------------> polution
so we have to show how idling contribute to pollution

in real gmat choices like a or b might make be temped to click(how can i judge if a choice is out of scope)
i have done several strengthen or weaken question where one have to just find out the assumptions.

i still sometimes entice to choose answer like a and b

expert please suggest some bullet proof strategy for strengthen and weakening

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
vishwas.arora Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Posted:
35 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Upvotes:
1
Target GMAT Score:
740
Post Sun Sep 04, 2011 6:37 am
VivianKerr wrote:
Conclusion: Damage from exhaust will diminish significantly

Evidence: Parking provided for 1/3 of buses; idling buses produces as much exhaust as driving

Assumptions: The exhaust from 1/3 of buses going away if enough to "significantly" diminish the damage; damage not caused by other reasons

Question Rephrase: What STRENGTHENS this conclusion?

Prediction: The FOCUS here must be related to the conclusion and continue to link the idling bus exhaust to the damage.

First pass:

A - relates to the assumptions, but not the conclusion Sad
B -
C -
D - how tourists come is irrelevant
E - if anything this would cause more exhaust and weaken

Let's examine the final two: B & C

Rephrase:
B - The pollution is ONLY from engine exhaust.
C - Buses spend 25% of their time driving.

B is tempting, but it doesn't relate to the buses. What if automobiles are contributing to the majority of the damage? The "engine" exhaust could come from trains, mopeds, etc, and doesn't HAVE to be coming from buses. This would not necessarily strengthen our link between the buses and the damage.

C is correct. If the buses are only driving 25% of the time, then 75% of the time they must be either parked or idling. So providing parking for 1/3 of the buses would REALLY help!

This is definitely a harder one.

Choice A does not relate the conclusion which RELIES on the idea that idling buses = damage. Just because the automobiles aren't causing damage doesn't mean that the damage isn't caused by a 3rd reason, not the buses.

BULLET PROOF Strategy: Do MORE work on the argument using your scratch paper BEFORE you read answer choices. For strengthen questions, make sure you understand the scope of the Conclusion and eliminate answer choices based on how well they relate to the Conclusion. For weakening questions, look for the choice that UNDERMINES the conclusion. Definitely consider the assumptions, but only to the extent that they bolster the conclusion.

Write down a PREDICTION, even a vague one, before you read the answer choices. When you first go through the choices, do not look for the correct answer. Instead, use your PREDICTION to eliminate the three worst answer choices. When you are left with two, REPHRASE them and compare them carefully and slowly. What are the subtle differences between them? Go back and compare them to your notes on the Evidence, Conclusion, and Assumptions. Know each one inside and out BEFORE selecting.

Take more time on CR and you will see better results!

INSPIRATIONAL QUOTE: Smile
“Thoroughness characterizes all successful men. Genius is the art of taking infinite pains. All great achievement has been characterized by extreme care, infinite painstaking, even to the minutest detail.” - Elbert Hubbard
Thanks for the wonderful and much wanted explanation Vivian!

But, as far as option E goes, it states that the buses, when not transporting the tourists, move around the city. So, if some parking is provided to these buses, they would better not pollute the city.

My doubts,

1) Is it the word "some" that is going against this option from acting as a strengthener?
If this were changed to "most", then doesn't it become a strong contender..?

2) Moving around the city, is it not the same as moving within the city? Does it mean that it goes out of the main city and thus does not cause any pollution to the city buildings?

Pl correct, if i am wrong.

Thanks & Regards

_________________
Jai Hind !

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
prateek_guy2004 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
26 Jul 2011
Posted:
398 messages
Followed by:
5 members
Upvotes:
41
Test Date:
November 2011
Target GMAT Score:
690+
Post Sun Sep 04, 2011 11:43 am
1) Is it the word "some" that is going against this option from acting as a strengthener?
If this were changed to "most", then doesn't it become a strong contender..?
A- Well most, all, every these are extreme words and indicates that the answer is incorrect.

2) Moving around the city, is it not the same as moving within the city? Does it mean that it goes out of the main city and thus does not cause any pollution to the city buildings?
[/b]Certainly its not the same and it changes the scope of the statement.

_________________
Don't look for the incorrect things that you have done rather look for remedies....

http://www.beatthegmat.com/motivation-t90253.html

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

GMAT/MBA Expert

lunarpower GMAT Instructor
Joined
03 Mar 2008
Posted:
3380 messages
Followed by:
1475 members
Upvotes:
2256
GMAT Score:
800
Post Mon Sep 12, 2011 3:48 am
prateek_guy2004 wrote:
1) Is it the word "some" that is going against this option from acting as a strengthener?
If this were changed to "most", then doesn't it become a strong contender..?
A- Well most, all, every these are extreme words and indicates that the answer is incorrect.

2) Moving around the city, is it not the same as moving within the city? Does it mean that it goes out of the main city and thus does not cause any pollution to the city buildings?
[/b]Certainly its not the same and it changes the scope of the statement.
the argument states that driving and idling produce similar amounts of exhaust, so the issue of driving vs. idling has no net effect on pollution in the city, and therefore no effect on the argument.

idiomatically, “around the city” could mean either (a) literally around the city -- as in “outside the city's perimeter” -- or (b) driving from place to place within the city. since these two meanings are very different, context should let you decide between them.
in the problem at hand, the idea that the tour buses would actually leave the city and drive around its perimeter is patently unreasonable, so “drive around” refers to driving randomly within the city limits. according to the facts in the argument, such driving will pollute the city as much as would idling, so (e) neither strengthens nor weakens the argument.
(if “drive around” actually meant that the buses left the city and drove around its perimeter, then that choice would weaken the argument anyway, so the issue is immaterial -- but it's still good to learn how that expression is used.)

_________________
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week.
prateek_guy2004 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
26 Jul 2011
Posted:
398 messages
Followed by:
5 members
Upvotes:
41
Test Date:
November 2011
Target GMAT Score:
690+
Post Sat Sep 03, 2011 1:51 pm
Yes i agree with vivian

Conclusion: Damage from exhaust will diminish significantly

Evidence: Parking provided for 1/3 of buses; idling buses produces as much exhaust as driving

A. The exhaust from Palitito's few automobiles isn’t a significant threat to the buildings.(out of scope)
B. Palitito's Renaissance buildings are not threatened by pollution other than engine
exhaust. correct
C. Tour buses typically spend less than one-quarter of the time they are in Palitito
transporting passengers from one site to another. Negative ...
D. Most tourists come to Palitito by tour bus than by any other single means of
transportation. (not relevant)
E. Some of the tour buses that are unable to find parking drive around Palitito while their
passengers are visiting a site.(weakening) [/b][/spoiler]

Was confused between B and C but realized C is not supporting...

HenceB

_________________
Don't look for the incorrect things that you have done rather look for remedies....

http://www.beatthegmat.com/motivation-t90253.html

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
n@resh Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
13 Apr 2010
Posted:
61 messages
Upvotes:
8
Post Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:16 am
arghya05 wrote:
For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from
many tour buses that come to the city. There has been little parking space, so most buses have
idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as
driving. The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses, so
damage to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminish significantly.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument?
A. The exhaust from Palitito's few automobiles isn’t a significant threat to the buildings.
B. Palitito's Renaissance buildings are not threatened by pollution other than engine
exhaust.
C. Tour buses typically spend less than one-quarter of the time they are in Palitito
transporting passengers from one site to another.
D. Most tourists come to Palitito by tour bus than by any other single means of
transportation.
E. Some of the tour buses that are unable to find parking drive around Palitito while their
passengers are visiting a site.


A and B are out of scope why?........................
as with B i can say no other effects contribute to pollution other than exhaust.................
so it is a strengthener

but the main relationship is iddling--------------------------> polution
so we have to show how idling contribute to pollution

in real gmat choices like a or b might make be temped to click(how can i judge if a choice is out of scope)
i have done several strengthen or weaken question where one have to just find out the assumptions.

i still sometimes entice to choose answer like a and b

expert please suggest some bullet proof strategy for strengthen and weakening
Ans is C!

B may seems temptin but it has a vaugue word: 'Engine'..now here engine can be of a bus or anyother automobile!
where as C is more specific and very apt to the Argument.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
GmatKiss Legendary Member Default Avatar
Joined
26 Jul 2011
Posted:
2789 messages
Followed by:
43 members
Upvotes:
206
Target GMAT Score:
700+
GMAT Score:
640
Post Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:48 am
navami wrote:
C
Sorry, could you please elaborate?

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
navami Legendary Member
Joined
20 Dec 2008
Posted:
540 messages
Followed by:
6 members
Upvotes:
37
Post Sat Sep 03, 2011 8:16 am
C

_________________
This time no looking back!!!
Navami

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
VivianKerr GMAT Instructor
Joined
17 Dec 2010
Posted:
1035 messages
Followed by:
364 members
Upvotes:
474
Post Mon Aug 29, 2011 7:15 am
Conclusion: Damage from exhaust will diminish significantly

Evidence: Parking provided for 1/3 of buses; idling buses produces as much exhaust as driving

Assumptions: The exhaust from 1/3 of buses going away if enough to "significantly" diminish the damage; damage not caused by other reasons

Question Rephrase: What STRENGTHENS this conclusion?

Prediction: The FOCUS here must be related to the conclusion and continue to link the idling bus exhaust to the damage.

First pass:

A - relates to the assumptions, but not the conclusion Sad
B -
C -
D - how tourists come is irrelevant
E - if anything this would cause more exhaust and weaken

Let's examine the final two: B & C

Rephrase:
B - The pollution is ONLY from engine exhaust.
C - Buses spend 25% of their time driving.

B is tempting, but it doesn't relate to the buses. What if automobiles are contributing to the majority of the damage? The "engine" exhaust could come from trains, mopeds, etc, and doesn't HAVE to be coming from buses. This would not necessarily strengthen our link between the buses and the damage.

C is correct. If the buses are only driving 25% of the time, then 75% of the time they must be either parked or idling. So providing parking for 1/3 of the buses would REALLY help!

This is definitely a harder one.

Choice A does not relate the conclusion which RELIES on the idea that idling buses = damage. Just because the automobiles aren't causing damage doesn't mean that the damage isn't caused by a 3rd reason, not the buses.

BULLET PROOF Strategy: Do MORE work on the argument using your scratch paper BEFORE you read answer choices. For strengthen questions, make sure you understand the scope of the Conclusion and eliminate answer choices based on how well they relate to the Conclusion. For weakening questions, look for the choice that UNDERMINES the conclusion. Definitely consider the assumptions, but only to the extent that they bolster the conclusion.

Write down a PREDICTION, even a vague one, before you read the answer choices. When you first go through the choices, do not look for the correct answer. Instead, use your PREDICTION to eliminate the three worst answer choices. When you are left with two, REPHRASE them and compare them carefully and slowly. What are the subtle differences between them? Go back and compare them to your notes on the Evidence, Conclusion, and Assumptions. Know each one inside and out BEFORE selecting.

Take more time on CR and you will see better results!

INSPIRATIONAL QUOTE: Smile
“Thoroughness characterizes all successful men. Genius is the art of taking infinite pains. All great achievement has been characterized by extreme care, infinite painstaking, even to the minutest detail.” - Elbert Hubbard

_________________
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
http://www.GMATrockstar.com
http://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: GMATrockstar@gmail.com

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! Smile

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

Best Conversation Starters

1 Roland2rule 125 topics
2 lheiannie07 110 topics
3 ardz24 60 topics
4 LUANDATO 55 topics
5 swerve 51 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

Most Active Experts

1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

151 posts
2 image description GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

135 posts
3 image description Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

129 posts
4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

111 posts
5 image description DavidG@VeritasPrep

Veritas Prep

83 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts