Lola forgot last three digits of one telephone number. All she remembers is that the missing digits were distinct, non-zero, and were in ascending order. Based on this information, she dials one number. What is the probability that she dials a wrong number?
[spoiler]made up by Sanjeev K Saxena for Avenues Abroad[/spoiler]
Lola forgot last three digits
This topic has expert replies
- sanju09
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 267 times
- Followed by:80 members
- GMAT Score:760
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Some examples of 3-digit numbers that meet the above criteria include 123, 156, 246, 489, 579, etc.sanju09 wrote:Lola forgot last three digits of one telephone number. All she remembers is that the missing digits were distinct, non-zero, and were in ascending order. Based on this information, she dials one number. What is the probability that she dials a wrong number?
[spoiler]made up by Sanjeev K Saxena for Avenues Abroad[/spoiler]
So, the question requires us to determine how many such numbers are possible.
Approach #1: Take the 9-digit number 123456789 and choose any 6 digits to eliminate.
Example: if we eliminate the digits 1,3,4,5,6 and 8, we're left with the 3-digit number 279
In how many ways can we select 6 digits to eliminate? Well, there are 9 digits altogether, and we must select 6. This can be accomplished in 9C6 ways (or 84 ways)
Approach #2: Take the 9 digits (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9) and choose any 3.
Now list those 3 digits in ascending order, and you have a 3-digit number that meets the given criteria.
Note: there's only 1 way to list 3 unique digits in ascending order.
In how many ways can we select 3 digits? Well, there are 9 digits altogether, and we must select 3. This can be accomplished in 9C3 ways (or 84 ways)
Aside: Notice that 9C6 = 9C3 = 84. In general, nCr = nC(n-r)
Okay, so we now know that there are 84 different 3-digit numbers, and only 1 of those numbers is the correct number. In other words, 83 of the 84 numbers are the wrong number.
So . . . P(wrong number) = 83/84
Cheers,
Brent
- krusta80
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:13 am
- Thanked: 34 times
- Followed by:5 members
We can also enumerate the first few possibilities and extrapolate the answer like so...sanju09 wrote:Lola forgot last three digits of one telephone number. All she remembers is that the missing digits were distinct, non-zero, and were in ascending order. Based on this information, she dials one number. What is the probability that she dials a wrong number?
[spoiler]made up by Sanjeev K Saxena for Avenues Abroad[/spoiler]
assuming XYZ represents the three digits:
For X = 1, we have the following possibilities for Z based on each value for Y
Y,possible Z's
2,7 (3 through 9)
3,6 (4 through 9)
4,5 (5 through 9)
5,4 (6 through 9)
6,3 (7 through 9)
7,2 (8 through 9)
8,1 (9 through 9)
The total possibilities, therefore, for X=1 is the sum of 1 through 7, which equals 8C2.
Now, for X = 2, we can see how there would be one less possiblity for Z, when given each value of Y. So it'll be the sum of 1 through 6, which is 7C2.
I'm seeing a pattern here...which ends at the highest possible value for X,Y,Z: 7,8,9. So, the last value of X will give us 1 possibility, so we know when to stop -> at 2C2
Combining it all we get...
8C2+7C2+6C2+5C2+4C2+3C2+2C2 = 28+21+15+10+6+3+1 = 84 possible 3-digit sequences as described above
P(wrong one) = 83/84
- sanju09
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 267 times
- Followed by:80 members
- GMAT Score:760
Thanks Brent and krusta80 for your decent inputs. Brent's way is marvelous and less complicated. krusta80's intelligent extrapolation method may sound 'rocket science' to many (minus me)
Thanks again
Thanks again
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
- krusta80
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:13 am
- Thanked: 34 times
- Followed by:5 members
I must say that I loved Brent's approach to this problem...very clever.sanju09 wrote:Thanks Brent and krusta80 for your decent inputs. Brent's way is marvelous and less complicated. krusta80's intelligent extrapolation method may sound 'rocket science' to many (minus me)
Thanks again
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 1:17 am
- Location: Nagpur, India
- Followed by:1 members
The other way to solve this problem is to find out the probability of dialing last 3 digits wrong.
Like for last 3 digits in ascending order first no. should be in between (1 to 7), second no. should be in between (2 to 8) & third no. should be in between ( 3 to 9).
If Lola dials first no. either 8 or 9 then, she is dialing wrong no. for sure.
Similarly, if she dials second no. either 1 or 9 then, she is dialing wrong no. for sure.
Similarly, if she dials third no. either 1 or 2 then, she is dialing wrong no. for sure.
So, can't we work out probability of dialing wrong no. at first place, which would be 2/7. Proability of dialing wrong no. at second place, which would be 2/7 & similarly & probability of dialing wrong no. at third place, which would be again 2/7.
Please help me to figure out if this approach is right.
- regards,
Rahul
Like for last 3 digits in ascending order first no. should be in between (1 to 7), second no. should be in between (2 to 8) & third no. should be in between ( 3 to 9).
If Lola dials first no. either 8 or 9 then, she is dialing wrong no. for sure.
Similarly, if she dials second no. either 1 or 9 then, she is dialing wrong no. for sure.
Similarly, if she dials third no. either 1 or 2 then, she is dialing wrong no. for sure.
So, can't we work out probability of dialing wrong no. at first place, which would be 2/7. Proability of dialing wrong no. at second place, which would be 2/7 & similarly & probability of dialing wrong no. at third place, which would be again 2/7.
Please help me to figure out if this approach is right.
- regards,
Rahul
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Hi Rahul,rahul jaiswal wrote:The other way to solve this problem is to find out the probability of dialing last 3 digits wrong.
Like for last 3 digits in ascending order first no. should be in between (1 to 7), second no. should be in between (2 to 8) & third no. should be in between ( 3 to 9).
If Lola dials first no. either 8 or 9 then, she is dialing wrong no. for sure.
Similarly, if she dials second no. either 1 or 9 then, she is dialing wrong no. for sure.
Similarly, if she dials third no. either 1 or 2 then, she is dialing wrong no. for sure.
So, can't we work out probability of dialing wrong no. at first place, which would be 2/7. Proability of dialing wrong no. at second place, which would be 2/7 & similarly & probability of dialing wrong no. at third place, which would be again 2/7.
Please help me to figure out if this approach is right.
- regards,
Rahul
This approach doesn't really address the question.
Lola already knows that the 3 digits are in ascending order. So, the digits that she enters will be in ascending order. Given that she is entering the digits in ascending order, our goal is to determine the probability that she does not enter the correct 3 digits.
Your solution suggests that she may not enter the 3 digits in ascending order.
Cheers,
Brent