Reading Comprehension

Linda Kerber argued in the mid-
1980's that after the American Revolution
(1775-1783), an ideology of "republican
Line motherhood" resulted in a surge of edu-
(5) cational opportunities for women in the
United States. Kerber maintained that
the leaders of the new nation wanted
women to be educated in order to raise
politically virtuous sons. A virtuous citi-
(10) zenry was considered essential to the
success of the country's republican form
of government; virtue was to be instilled
not only by churches and schools, but
by families, where the mother's role
(15) was crucial. Thus, according to Kerber,
motherhood became pivotal to the fate
of the republic, providing justification for
an unprecedented attention to female
education.
(20) Introduction of the republican moth-
erhood thesis dramatically changed
historiography. Prior to Kerber's work,
educational historians barely mentioned
women and girls; Thomas Woody's 1929
(25) work is the notable exception. Examining
newspaper advertisements for acade-
mies, Woody found that educational
opportunities increased for both girls
and boys around 1750. Pointing to "An
(30) Essay on Woman" (1753) as reflecting
a shift in view, Woody also claimed that
practical education for females had
many advocates before the Revolution.
Woody's evidence challenges the notion
(35) that the Revolution changed attitudes
regarding female education, although it
may have accelerated earlier trends.
Historians' reliance on Kerber's "repub-
lican motherhood" thesis may have
(40) obscured the presence of these trends,
making it difficult to determine to what
extent the Revolution really changed
women's lives.

The passage suggests that, with regard to the history of women's education in the United States, Kerber's work differs from Woody's primarily concerning which of the following?
(A) The extent to which women were interested in pursuing educational opportunities in the eighteenth century
(B) The extent of the support for educational opportunities for girls prior to the American Revolution
(C) The extent of public resistance to educational opportunities for women after the American Revolution
(D) Whether attitudes toward women's educational opportunities changed during the eighteenth century
(E) Whether women needed to be educated in order to contribute to the success of a republican form of government

greenwich wrote:Linda Kerber argued in the mid-
1980's that after the American Revolution
(1775-1783), an ideology of "republican
Line motherhood" resulted in a surge of edu-
(5) cational opportunities for women in the
United States. Kerber maintained that
the leaders of the new nation wanted
women to be educated in order to raise
politically virtuous sons. A virtuous citi-
(10) zenry was considered essential to the
success of the country's republican form
of government; virtue was to be instilled
not only by churches and schools, but
by families, where the mother's role
(15) was crucial. Thus, according to Kerber,
motherhood became pivotal to the fate
of the republic, providing justification for
an unprecedented attention to female
education.
(20) Introduction of the republican moth-
erhood thesis dramatically changed
historiography. Prior to Kerber's work,
educational historians barely mentioned
women and girls; Thomas Woody's 1929
(25) work is the notable exception. Examining
newspaper advertisements for acade-
mies, Woody found that educational
opportunities increased for both girls
and boys around 1750. Pointing to "An
(30) Essay on Woman" (1753) as reflecting
a shift in view, Woody also claimed that
practical education for females had
many advocates before the Revolution.
Woody's evidence challenges the notion
(35) that the Revolution changed attitudes
regarding female education, although it
may have accelerated earlier trends.
Historians' reliance on Kerber's "repub-
lican motherhood" thesis may have
(40) obscured the presence of these trends,
making it difficult to determine to what
extent the Revolution really changed
women's lives.

The passage suggests that, with regard to the history of women's education in the United States, Kerber's work differs from Woody's primarily concerning which of the following?
(A) The extent to which women were interested in pursuing educational opportunities in the eighteenth century
(B) The extent of the support for educational opportunities for girls prior to the American Revolution
(C) The extent of public resistance to educational opportunities for women after the American Revolution
(D) Whether attitudes toward women's educational opportunities changed during the eighteenth century
(E) Whether women needed to be educated in order to contribute to the success of a republican form of government

Please provide answer with explanation.

IMO - B

Kerber says American revolution resulted in surge in educational opportunities for women.

But Woody says this trend- educational opportunities for woman- had started early & revolution just fuelled it.

OA is A

Can anyone explain why is A?