Reading Comprehension

It is exceedingly difficult to make people realize that an evil
is an evil. For instance, we seize a man and deliberately do
him a malicious injury: say, imprison him for years. One would
not suppose that it needed any exceptional clearness of wit to
5 recognize in this an act of diabolical cruelty. But in England
such a recognition provokes a stare of surprise, followed by an
explanation that the outrage is punishment or justice or
something else that is all right, or perhaps by a heated attempt
to argue that we should all be robbed and murdered in our beds
10 if such senseless villainies as sentences of imprisonment were
not committed daily. It is useless to argue that even if this
were true, which it is not, the alternative to adding crimes
of our own to the crimes from which we suffer is not helpless
submission. Chickenpox is an evil; but if I were to declare
15 that we must either submit to it or else repress it by seizing
everyone who suffers from it and punishing them by inoculation
with smallpox, I should be laughed at; for though nobody could
deny that the result would be to prevent chickenpox to some
extent by making people avoid it much more carefully, and to
20 effect a further apparent prevention by making them conceal
it very anxiously, yet people would have sense enough to see
that the deliberate propagation of smallpox was a creation of
evil, and must therefore be ruled out in favor of purely humane
and hygienic measures. Yet in the precisely parallel case of a
25 man breaking into my house and stealing my diamonds I am
expected as a matter of course to steal ten years of his life.
If he tries to defeat that monstrous retaliation by shooting
me, my survivors hang him. The net result suggested by the
police statistics is that we inflict atrocious injuries on the
30 burglars we catch in order to make the rest take effectual
precautions against detection; so that instead of saving our
diamonds from burglary we only greatly decrease our chances
of ever getting them back, and increase our chances of being
shot by the robber.

35 But the thoughtless wickedness with which we scatter
sentences of imprisonment is as nothing compared to the
stupid levity with which we tolerate poverty as if it were
either a wholesome tonic for lazy people or else a virtue to
be embraced as St. Francis embraced it. If a man is indolent,
40 let him be poor. If he is drunken, let him be poor. If he is
not a gentleman, let him be poor. If he is addicted to the
fine arts or to pure science instead of to trade and finance,
let him be poor. If he chooses to spend his wages on his beer
and his family instead of saving it up for his old age, let
45 him be poor. Let nothing be done for "the undeserving": let
him be poor. Serve him right! Also -- somewhat inconsistently
-- blessed are the poor!


4. The passage is most probably intended to

A. serve as an introduction to a more detailed discussion of poverty
B. censure imprisonment as a punitive measure
C. analyze the possible repercussions of social evils
D. continue a prior discussion of strong measures against social evils
E. make people recognize social evils in the face of deliberate obfuscation

5. It can be inferred from the passage that the author would agree with all the following except

A. most people don't realize that by punishing offenders they are surrendering themselves to the vicious cycle of crime and punishment
B. sentences of imprisonment have little success in reducing the crime rate in society
C. it would be ridiculous to inoculate people suffering from chicken pox with small pox
D. if criminals were not strongly punished for their misdeeds there would be no law and order in society
E. tolerating poverty is at least as bad as inflicting punishments on criminals

6. The author's argument about imprisonment would be most weakened by showing that

A. imprisonment is not widely regarded as an act of cruelty
B. chicken pox and burglary are not analogous evils
C. imprisonment does not cause malicious injury
D. sentences of imprisonment are given increasingly rarely
E. a burglar who commits murder in self defense would not be hanged

7. The author apparently believes that people at the time he wrote the passage were

A. inclined to consider poverty a social evil
B. anxious to take the right steps to ensure an orderly society
C. too ready to judge other people unfairly
D. inconsistent in their attitude to poverty
E. in favor of unusually harsh punishment of all offenders

Are there only 2 para's?
Why don't you take the pain of removing all the numbers? What are the OA's?

4 C [what is repercussions]
5 D
6 C
7 D

IMO
A
D
B
D
Regards
Sid

IMO
E
D
A
D

OA: ADBD

CDDE

Can someone please explain the choice for 6?

6. The author's argument about imprisonment would be most weakened by showing that

A. imprisonment is not widely regarded as an act of cruelty
B. chicken pox and burglary are not analogous evils
C. imprisonment does not cause malicious injury
D. sentences of imprisonment are given increasingly rarely
E. a burglar who commits murder in self defense would not be hanged

TIA,
GK