Critical Reasoning

In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate. Since a third-party candidacy affects the two major candidates unequally, for reasons neither of them has any control over, the practice is unfair and should not be allowed.
If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?
(A) If the political platform of the third party is a compromise position between that of the two major parties, the third party will draw its voters equally from the two major parties.
(B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.
(C) A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.
(D) The political stance of a third party will be more radical than that of either of the two major parties.
(E) The founders of a third party are likely to be a coalition consisting of former leaders of the two major parties.


Why B and why not A

venmic wrote:In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate.

A is not correct because of the statement above. The third party ALWAYS affects one party more than the other.

B is then correct more out of pure logic. If the vote is split, each group gets 50% or not more than half.

C is off scope

D no evidence of this at all

E no evidence of this at all

(A)We don't know even if it's a compromise whether it will draw equal voters from 2 major sides..It may be unequal also

(B) CORRECT..The main thing is "Before the emergence of the 3rd party"...so if the voters were pre-divided then votes are sure for the 2 major parties and that will be equal