Welcome! Check out our free B-School Guides to learn how you compare with other applicants.
Login or Register
 

Inequality

This topic has 5 expert replies and 16 member replies
Goto page
  • 1,
  • 2
Next
gmatusa2010 Really wants to Beat The GMAT! Default Avatar
Joined
25 Jul 2010
Posted:
134 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Inequality Post Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:12 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Is x^2 greater than x ?
    (1) x^2 is greater than x^3.
    (2) x^2 is greater than x^4.

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Anurag@Gurome GMAT Instructor
    Joined
    02 Apr 2010
    Posted:
    3835 messages
    Followed by:
    466 members
    Thanked:
    1755 times
    GMAT Score:
    770
    Post Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:21 pm
    gmatusa2010 wrote:
    Is x^2 greater than x ?
    (1) x^2 is greater than x^3.
    (2) x^2 is greater than x^4.
    Statement 1: x^2 > x^3
    Implies, (x^3 - x^2) < 0
    => (x^2)(x - 1) < 0
    Thus either x < 1 except x = 0.
    For x < 0, x^2 > x
    For 0 < x < 1, x^2 < x

    Not sufficient

    Statement 2: x^2 > x^4
    Implies, (x^4 - x^2) < 0
    => (x^2)(x - 1)(x + 1) < 0
    Thus -1 < x < 1 except x = 0.
    => |x| < 1 except x = 0
    For, -1 < x < 0, x^2 > x
    For 0 < x < 1, x^2 < x

    Not sufficient

    1 & 2 Together: Common region satisfying both the statements is |x| < 1 except x = 0. But that is same as statement 2.

    Not sufficient.

    The correct answer is E.

    _________________
    Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
    GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
    Gurome, Inc.
    1-800-566-4043 (USA)

    Join Our Facebook Groups
    GMAT with Gurome
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
    Admissions with Gurome
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
    Career Advising with Gurome
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/



    Last edited by Anurag@Gurome on Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:46 pm; edited 1 time in total

    gmatusa2010 Really wants to Beat The GMAT! Default Avatar
    Joined
    25 Jul 2010
    Posted:
    134 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Post Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:32 pm
    That's what I got as well.

    Here's the OA explanation. Anurag, Isn't the error in their method is that they divided by x^2? because that eliminates answer? When can you divide by X^2 and when can't you? I guess in an equation and you know for sure its not zero?



    Explanation: x2 is greater than x for all numbers except for those values
    of x between 0 and 1. Thus, we need to know whether or not x falls in that
    range.

    Statement (1) is insu¢ cient. To simplify, divide both sides by x2, resulting
    in 1 > x. If thatÂ's true, x could be between 0 and 1, but it could also be less
    than 0.

    Statement (2) is also insu¢ cient. Again, simplify by dividing by x2, which
    gives you 1 > x2. Thus, x could be any number between -1 and 1. Again, it
    could be between 0 and 1, but it could also be between -1 and 0.
    Taken together, itÂ's still insu¢ cient. Both statements allow for the possi-
    bility that x is between 0 and 1, but both statements also make it possible that
    x is between -1 and 0. Choice (E) is correct.

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Post Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:34 pm
    gmatusa2010 wrote:
    Is x^2 greater than x ?
    (1) x^2 is greater than x^3.
    (2) x^2 is greater than x^4.
    Statement 1: x^2 is greater than x^3
    x = 1/2 works, because (1/2)^2 > (1/2)^3. Is (1/2)^2 > 1/2? No.
    x = -1/2 works, because (-1/2)^2 > (-1/2)^3. Is (-1/2)^2 > -1/2? Yes.
    Since the answer can be both No and Yes, insufficient.

    Statement 2: x^2 is greater than x^4
    x = 1/2 works, because (1/2)^2 > (1/2)^4. Is (1/2)^2 > 1/2? No.
    x = -1/2 works, because (-1/2)^2 > (-1/2)^4. Is (-1/2)^2 > -1/2? Yes.
    Since the answer can be both No and Yes, insufficient.

    Since 1/2 and -1/2 satisfy both statements, even when the 2 statements are combined, insufficient.

    The correct answer is E.

    _________________
    Mitch Hunt
    GMAT Private Tutor and Instructor
    GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
    If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
    Contact me about long distance tutoring!



    Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:41 pm; edited 2 times in total

    Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
    anshumishra GMAT Destroyer!
    Joined
    15 Jun 2010
    Posted:
    543 messages
    Followed by:
    2 members
    Thanked:
    138 times
    Post Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:35 pm
    gmatusa2010 wrote:
    Is x^2 greater than x ?
    (1) x^2 is greater than x^3.
    (2) x^2 is greater than x^4.
    x^2 > x ?

    Statement 1:
    x^2 is greater than x^3.

    x = -2, x^2 = 4, x^3 = -8 => x^2 > x
    x = 1/2, x^2 = 1/4, x^3 = 1/8 => x^2 < x -- Insufficient

    Statement 2:
    x^2 is greater than x^4.

    x = 1/2, x^2 = 1/4, x^4 = 1/16 => x^2 < x
    x = -1/2 , x^2 = 1/4, x^4 = 1/16 => x^2 > x --- Insufficient

    Combining 1 and 2:
    x^2 is greater than x^3 and x^4 :

    x = 1/2, x^2 = 1/4, x^3= 1/8, x^4 = 1/16 => x^2 < x
    x = -1/2 , x^2 = 1/4,, x^3 = -1/8, x^4 = 1/16 => x^2 > x -- Still Insufficient

    Hence, E

    _________________
    Thanks
    Anshu

    (Every mistake is a lesson learned )

    anshumishra GMAT Destroyer!
    Joined
    15 Jun 2010
    Posted:
    543 messages
    Followed by:
    2 members
    Thanked:
    138 times
    Post Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:37 pm
    Anurag@Gurome wrote:
    => |x| < 1 except x = 0

    Sufficient

    The correct answer is B.
    |x| < 1, doesn't mean x^2 < x
    as when x = 1/2, x^2 < x
    but when x =-1/2, x^2 > x

    _________________
    Thanks
    Anshu

    (Every mistake is a lesson learned )

    gmatusa2010 Really wants to Beat The GMAT! Default Avatar
    Joined
    25 Jul 2010
    Posted:
    134 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Post Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:40 pm
    Mitch you are right. I drew the X^2>x wrong. X^2>x => X<0 or X>1. E is right. But can you really divide by x^2? I know that's a legal algebra operation but does it eliminate possibilities?

    anshumishra GMAT Destroyer!
    Joined
    15 Jun 2010
    Posted:
    543 messages
    Followed by:
    2 members
    Thanked:
    138 times
    Post Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:47 pm
    gmatusa2010 wrote:
    Mitch you are right. I drew the X^2>x wrong. X^2>x => X<0 or X>1. E is right. But can you really divide by x^2? I know that's a legal algebra operation but does it eliminate possibilities?
    Not here, as we for sure know, x!=0 based on the two statements [x^2>x^3 & x^2 >x^4].

    _________________
    Thanks
    Anshu

    (Every mistake is a lesson learned )

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Anurag@Gurome GMAT Instructor
    Joined
    02 Apr 2010
    Posted:
    3835 messages
    Followed by:
    466 members
    Thanked:
    1755 times
    GMAT Score:
    770
    Post Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:50 pm
    While dealing with inequalities with exponents always remember there are some traps,
      1. The trend is not similar for |x| > 1 and |x| < 1
      2. For negative x, the powers alternately change their signs too.


    Here is another approach which tackles the problem logically. While dealing with exponents of variables always remember the following scenarios. Also try to understand them. Then you can solve this kind of problems just by looking at it.

    For any +ve number x,
      1. If x < 1, then repeated multiplication of the number with itself results in smaller quantity. Hence x > x^2 > x^3 > x^4 > ...
      2. If x >1, then repeated multiplication of the number with itself results in larger quantity. Hence x < x^2 < x^3 < x^4 < ...

    However for any -ve number x the scenario is a bit complicated due to alternate sign change.
      1. If x < 1, then repeated multiplication of the number with itself results in smaller quantity but even powers are positive. Hence x^2 > x^4 > ... > x > x^3 > x^5 > ...
      2. If x >1, then repeated multiplication of the number with itself results in larger quantity but even powers are positive. Hence ... x^5 < x^3 < x < x^2 < x^4 ...


    Now the problem asks for is x^2 > x?
    If you understood the scenario, you can easily identify that this is possible if either x is negative or x greater than 1.

    Now even combining both the statements we can't answer the question in yes or no.

    _________________
    Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
    GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
    Gurome, Inc.
    1-800-566-4043 (USA)

    Join Our Facebook Groups
    GMAT with Gurome
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
    Admissions with Gurome
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
    Career Advising with Gurome
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/

    gmatusa2010 Really wants to Beat The GMAT! Default Avatar
    Joined
    25 Jul 2010
    Posted:
    134 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Post Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:50 pm
    I don't quite understand, can you expand on that thought.

    I guess this is veering off but can you speak on 1) when can u divide and 2) when can't you?

    anshumishra wrote:
    gmatusa2010 wrote:
    Mitch you are right. I drew the X^2>x wrong. X^2>x => X<0 or X>1. E is right. But can you really divide by x^2? I know that's a legal algebra operation but does it eliminate possibilities?
    Not here, as we for sure know, x!=0 based on the two statements [x^2>x^3 & x^2 >x^4].

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Anurag@Gurome GMAT Instructor
    Joined
    02 Apr 2010
    Posted:
    3835 messages
    Followed by:
    466 members
    Thanked:
    1755 times
    GMAT Score:
    770
    Post Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:51 pm
    anshumishra wrote:
    |x| < 1, doesn't mean x^2 < x
    as when x = 1/2, x^2 < x
    but when x =-1/2, x^2 > x
    Sorry guys.
    I realized the mistake while typing the other solution. Edited it.

    _________________
    Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
    GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
    Gurome, Inc.
    1-800-566-4043 (USA)

    Join Our Facebook Groups
    GMAT with Gurome
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
    Admissions with Gurome
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
    Career Advising with Gurome
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Post Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:58 pm
    gmatusa2010 wrote:
    Mitch you are right. I drew the X^2>x wrong. X^2>x => X<0 or X>1. E is right. But can you really divide by x^2? I know that's a legal algebra operation but does it eliminate possibilities?
    When a DS question involves a variable and an inequality -- and we don't know that the variable is positive -- I discourage simplifying by multiplication or division. The risk is too great. I find plugging in values far safer.

    _________________
    Mitch Hunt
    GMAT Private Tutor and Instructor
    GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
    If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
    Contact me about long distance tutoring!

    Thanked by: sohrabkalra
    Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
    anshumishra GMAT Destroyer!
    Joined
    15 Jun 2010
    Posted:
    543 messages
    Followed by:
    2 members
    Thanked:
    138 times
    Post Mon Jan 17, 2011 10:00 pm
    gmatusa2010 wrote:
    I don't quite understand, can you expand on that thought.

    I guess this is veering off but can you speak on 1) when can u divide and 2) when can't you?

    anshumishra wrote:
    gmatusa2010 wrote:
    Mitch you are right. I drew the X^2>x wrong. X^2>x => X<0 or X>1. E is right. But can you really divide by x^2? I know that's a legal algebra operation but does it eliminate possibilities?
    Not here, as we for sure know, x!=0 based on the two statements [x^2>x^3 & x^2 >x^4].
    Lets take an example (equality, to be simple..In inequalities you have to be extra careful) :
    x^4-x^2 = 0
    => x^2(x^2 -1) = 0
    => x^2*(x+1)*(x-1) = 0
    All the possible roots = 0,1,-1

    If someone just knows that x is non-zero, then you can divide both sides by x^2 , and are not losing this solution (x=0, useless as we know it is invalid).
    Also, dividing both sides by x^2 is only allowed when x^2 is non-zero, otherwise in right side you are doing 0/0 in this case which is not defined.

    So, in simple terms, when x^2 ! = 0, you should.

    _________________
    Thanks
    Anshu

    (Every mistake is a lesson learned )

    chendawg Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
    Joined
    24 Nov 2009
    Posted:
    163 messages
    Followed by:
    4 members
    Thanked:
    12 times
    Test Date:
    7/8
    Target GMAT Score:
    760
    GMAT Score:
    660
    Post Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:24 pm
    GMATGuruNY wrote:
    When a DS question involves a variable and an inequality -- and we don't know that the variable is positive -- I discourage simplifying by multiplication or division. The risk is too great. I find plugging in values far safer.
    I definitely agree with this statement......I just have to be careful and organized with the lists and charts I make personally.

    thebigkats Rising GMAT Star Default Avatar
    Joined
    13 Sep 2010
    Posted:
    86 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    25 times
    Test Date:
    04/23/2011
    Target GMAT Score:
    740
    GMAT Score:
    710
    Post Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:58 pm
    Some simple rules:
    1. Positive fraction reduces in value when its power is increased (x > x^2 > x^3...)
    2. Positive integer increases in value when its power is increased (x < x^2 < x^3....)
    3. A number raised to an EVEN power is always positive
    4. Negative no will maintain its sign when raised to an ODD power (x^1, x^3 etc.)
    5. +ve no > -ve no

    STEM - Is x^2 > x?

    From Rule #3 - x^2 is always positive.
    From Rule #2 and #5 - x needs to be positive integer _or_ negative no (integer or fraction) for this to be true.

    STAT #1 - x^2 is greater than x^3.

    From Rule #1 - it could be +ve fraction (because x^3 < x^2)
    From rule #2 - x is NOT a positive integer (else x^3 would be > x^2)
    From Rule #3 - x^2 is always positive
    From Rule #4 - x^3 can be +ve or -ve based on sign of x
    From rule #5 - x^2 > x^3 when x is negative

    TAKEAWAY #1 - So x is either a positive fraction or a negative fraction or negative no.
    Doesn't completely meet the requirement given above

    INSUFFICIENT

    STAT #2 - x^2 is greater than x^4

    Say y=x^2 ==> y > y^2
    From Rule #3 - y is positive (x can be +ve or -ve) and y^2 is positive
    From rule #1 - y is a fraction ==> x is a fraction

    TAKEAWAY #2 - So x is either a positive fraction or negative fraction
    Doesn't completely meet the requirement given above

    INSUFFICIENT

    TOGETHER

    Even together, TAKEAWAY #1 and #2 - x is either a positive fraction or a negative fraction.
    From requirement above, this would be true in some cases (negative fraction) and not in other cases (positive fraction)

    INSUFFICIENT

    hence E

    Thanked by: safeerkhan

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 vipulgoyal 32 topics
    2 hemant_rajput 23 topics
    3 guerrero 20 topics
    4 abhirup1711 17 topics
    5 sana.noor 15 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    204 posts
    2 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    144 posts
    3 image description Jim@StratusPrep

    Stratus Prep

    54 posts
    4 image description Jon@Admissionado

    Admissionado

    42 posts
    5 image description David@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    35 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts