State X's income-averaging law allows a portion of one's income to be taxed at lower rate than the rate based on one's total taxable income. To use income averaging, the taxpayer must have earned taxable income for a particular year that exceeds 140 percent of his or her average taxable income for the previous three years. People using income averaging owe less tax for that year than they would without income averaging.
Which of the following individuals would be most seriously affected if income averaging were not permitted in computing the taxes owed for current year?
(A) Individuals whose income has steadily decreased for the past three years
(B) Individuals whose income increased by 50 percent four years ago and has remained the same since then
(C) Individuals whose income has doubled this year after remaining about the same for five years
(D) Individuals who had no income this year, but did in each of the previous three years
(E) Individuals who are retired and whose income has remained about the same for the past ten years
OA after some discussions
Income-averaging law
This topic has expert replies
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
We want to know who would be most affected if income averaging were NOT allowed THIS YEAR. Therefore, we need to find someone who qualifies for income averaging this year.Sunny22uk wrote:State X's income-averaging law allows a portion of one's income to be taxed at lower rate than the rate based on one's total taxable income. To use income averaging, the taxpayer must have earned taxable income for a particular year that exceeds 140 percent of his or her average taxable income for the previous three years. People using income averaging owe less tax for that year than they would without income averaging.
Which of the following individuals would be most seriously affected if income averaging were not permitted in computing the taxes owed for current year?
(A) Individuals whose income has steadily decreased for the past three years
(B) Individuals whose income increased by 50 percent four years ago and has remained the same since then
(C) Individuals whose income has doubled this year after remaining about the same for five years
(D) Individuals who had no income this year, but did in each of the previous three years
(E) Individuals who are retired and whose income has remained about the same for the past ten years
OA after some discussions
To qualify, "the taxpayer must have earned taxable income for a particular year that exceeds 140 percent of his or her average taxable income for the previous three years." Only the person in choice (C) satisfies the test: choose (C).
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 3:33 pm
- Thanked: 8 times
Hi Stuart, thanks for your reply. the OA is indeed C. I got your explanation, I was adding 140% of average taxable income to the average taxable income
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to loose sight of the shore.
"if income averaging were not permitted" Then it voids the facts given in para. Although it is NOT clear how total taxable income is calculated, but 140% of avg of last 3 year taxes is GOOD. Hence, More Taxable Income than prev years. (C) has 100%, hence (C)
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:26 am