If L & W represent the length and width, respectively, of the rectangle above, what is the perimeter?
1). 2L+W=40
2). L+W=25
DS Geometry
This topic has expert replies
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 1:00 pm
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Perimeter of a rectangle with length L and width W = L+L+W+W = 2L + 2W = 2(L+W).scottchapman wrote:If L & W represent the length and width, respectively, of the rectangle above, what is the perimeter?
1). 2L+W=40
2). L+W=25
Question stem, rephrased:
What is L+W?
Statement 1: 2L + W = 40
Thus, W = 40 - 2L.
Case 1: L=10, implying that W = 40 - 2*10 = 20.
In this case, L+W = 10+20 = 30.
Case 2: L=15, implying that W = 40 - 2*15 = 10.
In this case, L+W = 15+10 = 25.
Since L+W can be different values, INSUFFICIENT.
Statement 2: L+W = 25
SUFFICIENT.
The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Target question: What is the perimeter?scottchapman wrote:If L & W represent the length and width, respectively, of the rectangle above, what is the perimeter?
1). 2L + W = 40
2). L + W = 25
This is a great candidate for REPHRASING the target question.
Aside: We have a free video with tips on rephrasing the target question: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... cy?id=1100
If L and W represent the rectangle's length and width, then the perimeter = 2L + 2W.
So, we can REPHRASE the target question as...
REPHRASED target question: What is the value of 2L + 2W?
Statement 1: 2L + W = 40
This statement does not FEEL sufficient to answer the rephrased target question. So, I'm going to PLUG IN numbers.
There are several values of L and W that satisfy statement 1. Here are two:
Case a: L = 5 and W = 30, in which case 2L + 2W = 70
Case b: L = 10 and W = 20, in which case 2L + 2W = 60
Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Aside: For more on this idea of plugging in values when a statement doesn't feel sufficient, you can read my article: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/articles/dat ... lug-values
Statement 2: L + W = 25
If we take this equation and multiply both sides by 2, we get: 2L + 2W = 50
PERFECT - we have answered the REPHRASED target question!
Since we can answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT
Answer = B
Cheers,
Brent
- MartyMurray
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:26 am
- Location: https://martymurraycoaching.com/
- Thanked: 955 times
- Followed by:140 members
- GMAT Score:800
Scott, this is a good example of a C trap question.
C trap questions are set up to get the test taker thinking that both statements are needed to get to the answer.
In this case, one could be thinking this way. "To calculate the perimeter, I need the length and width."
That thinking might even seem somehow confirmed after working on Statement 1, which allows for multiple values of L and W.
So then you might jump to Statement 2 and find that once again you can't determine the value of L or W.
At that point maybe you notice that you can subtract Statement 2 from Statement 1 and easily calculate the values of L and W. "Ahhhh," you think. "The answer is C."
The thing is that that combining of the statements is not necessary. You don't actually need the values of L and W because P = (L + W) + (L + W). So as soon as you have L + W = 25 you are set. So Statement 2 is sufficient and the answer is B.
If you didn't see that and instead chose C, then you fell into a C trap.
So there's one thing to be aware of in order to do better on DS.
C trap questions are set up to get the test taker thinking that both statements are needed to get to the answer.
In this case, one could be thinking this way. "To calculate the perimeter, I need the length and width."
That thinking might even seem somehow confirmed after working on Statement 1, which allows for multiple values of L and W.
So then you might jump to Statement 2 and find that once again you can't determine the value of L or W.
At that point maybe you notice that you can subtract Statement 2 from Statement 1 and easily calculate the values of L and W. "Ahhhh," you think. "The answer is C."
The thing is that that combining of the statements is not necessary. You don't actually need the values of L and W because P = (L + W) + (L + W). So as soon as you have L + W = 25 you are set. So Statement 2 is sufficient and the answer is B.
If you didn't see that and instead chose C, then you fell into a C trap.
So there's one thing to be aware of in order to do better on DS.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 1:00 pm
Thank you all for your responses. I struggle with DS and I think part of the reason for it is not rewording the question effectively. It makes sense after I see you guys go through the steps, but for whatever reason, I continue to make the same errors. I'm assuming I just need more practice...
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
EVERYONE struggles with Data Sufficiency (DS) questions at first. Keep in mind that this question type is unique to the GMAT, so it's totally foreign territory.scottchapman wrote:Thank you all for your responses. I struggle with DS and I think part of the reason for it is not rewording the question effectively. It makes sense after I see you guys go through the steps, but for whatever reason, I continue to make the same errors. I'm assuming I just need more practice...
It just takes time for the concepts and strategies to become secondary, at which point you may come to find that DS questions are actually easier than Problem Solving questions.
I could start listing dozens of DS strategies and common mistakes, but it's easier to just direct you to our free set of videos that cover everything you need to know to tackle DS questions: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-data-sufficiency
Cheers,
Brent
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
The geometry problem above is a VALUE DS: a DS whose question stem asks for a specific value.scottchapman wrote:Thank you all for your responses. I struggle with DS and I think part of the reason for it is not rewording the question effectively. It makes sense after I see you guys go through the steps, but for whatever reason, I continue to make the same errors. I'm assuming I just need more practice...
One way to evaluate the statements -- and to avoid falling for a trap -- is to TEST TWO CASES.
If the desired value is THE SAME in each case, the statement is SUFFICIENT.
If the desired value is NOT the same in each case, the statement is INSUFFICIENT.
Statement 1: 2L + W = 40If L & W represent the length and width, respectively, of the rectangle above, what is the perimeter?
1). 2L + W = 40
2). L + W = 25
Case 1: L=10, W=20, with the result that 2L + W = 2*10 + 20 = 40
The following rectangle is yielded:
Case 2: L=5, W=30, with the result that 2L + W = 2*5 + 30 = 40
The following rectangle is yielded:
Since the perimeter is NOT the same in each case, INSUFFICIENT.
Statement 2: L+W = 25
Case 3: L=10, W=15
The following rectangle is yielded:
Case 4: L=5, W=20
The following rectangle is yielded:
Since the perimeter is THE SAME in each case, SUFFICIENT.
The correct answer is B.
One advantage to this approach:
It does not require any special insight.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
You'll definitely get there. Once you get the hang of the format, you may find yourself scoring higher on DS than on PS, even if the questions seem hard. DS is MUCH more guessable than PS, so you can get away with a lot of inspiring guesswork / trial and error / risk intelligence, as opposed to PS where you often need to know the math in question.scottchapman wrote:Thank you all for your responses. I struggle with DS and I think part of the reason for it is not rewording the question effectively. It makes sense after I see you guys go through the steps, but for whatever reason, I continue to make the same errors. I'm assuming I just need more practice...