Source:- "MGMAT"
If (a - b)c < 0, which of the following cannot be true?
(A) a < b
(B) c < 0
(C) |c| < 1
(D) ac > bc
(E) a2 - b2 > 0
Answer is D
But i am confused with option E. The explanation about E is, "If we factor this expression, we get (a + b)(a - b) < 0. This tells us that the expressions a + b and a - b have opposite signs, which is possible according to the question", confusing.
How can factoring the expression changes the sign from > (greater than) to < (lesser than) ? or Is this some rule of inequality?
I have no idea. Please reply.
Regards
Vinni
If (a – b)c < 0, which of the following cannot be true?
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:33 pm
- Thanked: 158 times
- Followed by:21 members
we have two options 1) (a - b)<0 and c>0, 2) (a-b)>0 and c<0
precisely these options 1) a<b and c>0 and 2) a>b, c<0
a) a < b is possible
b) c < 0 possible too
c) |c| < 1 translates into -1<c<1 which is possible (although we have specified that c cannot be 0, it's either positive or negative - this question is NOT MUST BE TRUE type; the question is asking about possibility)
d) ac > bc translates into ac-bc>0 and from the original questions (a-b)c<0 is equivalent to ac-bc<0 which is not possible
e) a^2 - b^2 > 0 translates into (a-b)(a+b)>0 or two options 1) (a-b)>0 and (a+b)>0, 2) (a-b)<0 and (a+b)<0. Both give 1) a>b and a>-b or a>|b|, 2) a<|b| which is also possible
precisely these options 1) a<b and c>0 and 2) a>b, c<0
a) a < b is possible
b) c < 0 possible too
c) |c| < 1 translates into -1<c<1 which is possible (although we have specified that c cannot be 0, it's either positive or negative - this question is NOT MUST BE TRUE type; the question is asking about possibility)
d) ac > bc translates into ac-bc>0 and from the original questions (a-b)c<0 is equivalent to ac-bc<0 which is not possible
e) a^2 - b^2 > 0 translates into (a-b)(a+b)>0 or two options 1) (a-b)>0 and (a+b)>0, 2) (a-b)<0 and (a+b)<0. Both give 1) a>b and a>-b or a>|b|, 2) a<|b| which is also possible
Success doesn't come overnight!
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Anurag@Gurome
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3835
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Milpitas, CA
- Thanked: 1854 times
- Followed by:523 members
- GMAT Score:770
No,factorization never changes the sign of the inequality.vinni.k wrote:Source:- "MGMAT"
If (a - b)c < 0, which of the following cannot be true?
(A) a < b
(B) c < 0
(C) |c| < 1
(D) ac > bc
(E) a2 - b2 > 0
Answer is D
But i am confused with option E. The explanation about E is, "If we factor this expression, we get (a + b)(a - b) < 0. This tells us that the expressions a + b and a - b have opposite signs, which is possible according to the question", confusing.
How can factoring the expression changes the sign from > (greater than) to < (lesser than) ? or Is this some rule of inequality?
I have no idea. Please reply.
Regards
Vinni
What has been done is not correct.
(a^2 - b^2) > 0 implies that (a+b)(a-b) > 0.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
- vinni.k
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 4:27 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:620
Anurag thank you so much. Now i am relieved. This small doubt was making my brain puzzled.Anurag@Gurome wrote:
No,factorization never changes the sign of the inequality.
What has been done is not correct.
(a^2 - b^2) > 0 implies that (a+b)(a-b) > 0.
Regards
Vinni.k
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Anurag@Gurome
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3835
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Milpitas, CA
- Thanked: 1854 times
- Followed by:523 members
- GMAT Score:770
You are welcome Vinni.vinni.k wrote:
Anurag thank you so much. Now i am relieved. This small doubt was making my brain puzzled.
Regards
Vinni.k
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
How do you justify the above two possibilities?pemdas wrote: e) a^2 - b^2 > 0 translates into (a-b)(a+b)>0 or two options 1) (a-b)>0 and (a+b)>0, 2) (a-b)<0 and (a+b)<0. Both give 1) a>b and a>-b or a>|b|, 2) a<|b| which is also possible
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:01 am
- Thanked: 10 times
First thing I did was multiply out.
So I get ac - bc < 0.
add bc to the other side and you get ac < bc. D is the opposite, so D.
So I get ac - bc < 0.
add bc to the other side and you get ac < bc. D is the opposite, so D.
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
Anurag answered Vinni's original question regarding the explanation, but I want to discuss a super-fast way to solve this particular problem.vinni.k wrote:Source:- "MGMAT"
If (a - b)c < 0, which of the following cannot be true?
(A) a < b
(B) c < 0
(C) |c| < 1
(D) ac > bc
(E) a2 - b2 > 0
Regards
Vinni
It's often quicker to solve number property questions by focusing on the concepts underlying the question rather than by doing a whole lot of math. Let's approach this question with that in mind.
Since the product of two terms is negative, we know that one term must be negative and the other positive. In this question, our two terms are "a-b" and "c".If (a - b)c < 0, which of the following cannot be true?
Upon scanning the choices, we note that answers A, B, C and E only focus on one of the two terms. Since each term could be positive or negative in a vacuum (i.e. without considering the other term), there's no possible way that any of these 4 choices could be correct.
(A small caveat - if A, B, C or E told us that one of the terms were equal to 0, then that would in fact be impossible and the correct answer to the question.)
Only D provides information about both terms; accordingly, D must be the correct answer to the question.
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
It's not the technicalities of the math I was interested in. My question was how do you say option "E" is possible based on the deductions you used to arrive on the mod part.pemdas wrote:algebra - the product of two positives or two negatives is positive. Do you need explanation for mod part?
Thanks.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:33 pm
- Thanked: 158 times
- Followed by:21 members
ah, you mean this
besides i've posted this
have i cleared ur doubt?
by analyzing the question itself, heree) a^2 - b^2 > 0 translates into (a-b)(a+b)>0 or two options 1) (a-b)>0 and (a+b)>0, 2) (a-b)<0 and (a+b)<0. Both give 1) a>b and a>-b or a>|b|, 2) a<|b| which is also possible
i've deduced a<b and a>b as two options possible should satisfywe have two options 1) (a - b)<0 and c>0, 2) (a-b)>0 and c<0
precisely these options 1) a<b and c>0 and 2) a>b, c<0
besides i've posted this
so basically, we are left without 'c'-yes, BUT we are looking into possibility rather than MUST BE TRUE in all casesc) |c| < 1 translates into -1<c<1 which is possible (although we have specified that c cannot be 0, it's either positive or negative - this question is NOT MUST BE TRUE type; the question is asking about possibility)
have i cleared ur doubt?
Success doesn't come overnight!