If 0<x<y, is y-x < 0.00005
(1) x>1/60,000
(2) y<1/15,000
I can't find the solution because I transform 1/60,000 into 1/6x10^5, which I transform into 6^10^-5. Can you tell me where I'm wrong? OA is C. Thanks
Source: GMATPrep Question Pack 1
If 0<x<y, is y-x < 0.00005
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:24 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 28 times
If 0<x<y, is y-x < 0.00005
(1) x>1/60,000
(2) y<1/15,000
first consider statement-2:
y<1/15,000 => y - 1/60,000 < 1/15,000 - 1/60,000
from statement-1, as x>1/60,000,
y-x < 1/15,000 - 1/60,000
=> y-x < 1/15,000 (1-1/4)
=> y-x < 1/15,000 (3/4)
=> y-x < 1/20,000
=> y-x < 1/2 * 10^(-4)
=> y-x < 0.00005
=> y-x is definitely less than 0.0005 as 0.0005 is greater than 0.00005
As both statements are used, answer is C
(1) x>1/60,000
(2) y<1/15,000
first consider statement-2:
y<1/15,000 => y - 1/60,000 < 1/15,000 - 1/60,000
from statement-1, as x>1/60,000,
y-x < 1/15,000 - 1/60,000
=> y-x < 1/15,000 (1-1/4)
=> y-x < 1/15,000 (3/4)
=> y-x < 1/20,000
=> y-x < 1/2 * 10^(-4)
=> y-x < 0.00005
=> y-x is definitely less than 0.0005 as 0.0005 is greater than 0.00005
As both statements are used, answer is C
RaviSankar Vemuri
Join my Google Group on Math:
https://groups.google.com/group/mathbyvemuri
My Blog on Math:
https://mathbyvemuri.blocked/
Some concepts for GMAT:
https://mathbyvemuri.blogspot.in/2012/05 ... -data.html
https://mathbyvemuri.blogspot.in/2012/05 ... dates.html
https://mathbyvemuri.blogspot.in/2012/05 ... es-of.html
Join my Google Group on Math:
https://groups.google.com/group/mathbyvemuri
My Blog on Math:
https://mathbyvemuri.blocked/
Some concepts for GMAT:
https://mathbyvemuri.blogspot.in/2012/05 ... -data.html
https://mathbyvemuri.blogspot.in/2012/05 ... dates.html
https://mathbyvemuri.blogspot.in/2012/05 ... es-of.html
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 3:19 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
- GMAT Score:710
Hi, thanks for your reply. However, I don't understand your last sentence: "y-x is definitely less than 0.0005 as 0.0005 is greater than 0.00005".
Isn't y-x < 0.00005 already what we were looking for?
Thanks.
Isn't y-x < 0.00005 already what we were looking for?
Thanks.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Anurag@Gurome
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3835
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Milpitas, CA
- Thanked: 1854 times
- Followed by:523 members
- GMAT Score:770
0.00005 = 5/100000 = (5 * 6)/(6 * 100000) = 3/60,000massi2884 wrote:If 0<x<y, is y-x < 0.00005
(1) x>1/60,000
(2) y<1/15,000
I can't find the solution because I transform 1/60,000 into 1/6x10^5, which I transform into 6^10^-5. Can you tell me where I'm wrong? OA is C. Thanks
Source: GMATPrep Question Pack 1
1/15000 = 4/(4 * 15000) = 4/60,000
(1) x > (1/60,000)
If x = 2/60,000 and y = 3/60,000, then y - x = 3/60,000 - 2/60,000 = 1/60,000 < 0.00005
If x = 2/60,000 and y = 5/60,000, then y - x = 5/60,000 - 2/60,000 = 3/60,000 = 0.00005
No definite answer; NOT sufficient.
(2) y < 1/15,000
If x = 2/60,000 and y = 3/60,000, then y - x = 3/60,000 - 2/60,000 = 1/60,000 < 0.00005
If x = 1/1,20,000 and y = 7/1,20,000, then y - x = 7/1,20,000- 1/1,20,000 = 6/1,20,000 = 3/60,000 = 0.00005
No definite answer; NOT sufficient.
Combining (1) and (2), x > 1/60,000 and y < 1/15,000
OR -x < -1/60,000 and y < 1/15,000
Now the inequalities are in the same direction, so we can add them to get the range of y - x.
y - x < (1/15,000 - 1/60,000)
y - x < 3/60,000
y - x < 0.00005; SUFFICIENT.
The correct answer is C.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:24 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 28 times
It's a simple logic: If x < 10, we can definitely say that x < 20 as well.massi2884 wrote:Hi, thanks for your reply. However, I don't understand your last sentence: "y-x is definitely less than 0.0005 as 0.0005 is greater than 0.00005".
Isn't y-x < 0.00005 already what we were looking for?
Thanks.
Similarly, as we got here that, y-x < 0.00005, it's sure that y-x < 0.0005
RaviSankar Vemuri
Join my Google Group on Math:
https://groups.google.com/group/mathbyvemuri
My Blog on Math:
https://mathbyvemuri.blocked/
Some concepts for GMAT:
https://mathbyvemuri.blogspot.in/2012/05 ... -data.html
https://mathbyvemuri.blogspot.in/2012/05 ... dates.html
https://mathbyvemuri.blogspot.in/2012/05 ... es-of.html
Join my Google Group on Math:
https://groups.google.com/group/mathbyvemuri
My Blog on Math:
https://mathbyvemuri.blocked/
Some concepts for GMAT:
https://mathbyvemuri.blogspot.in/2012/05 ... -data.html
https://mathbyvemuri.blogspot.in/2012/05 ... dates.html
https://mathbyvemuri.blogspot.in/2012/05 ... es-of.html
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
Sometimes brute force is the key to happiness on the GMAT.massi2884 wrote:If 0<x<y, is y-x < 0.00005
(1) x>1/60,000
(2) y<1/15,000
I can't find the solution because I transform 1/60,000 into 1/6x10^5, which I transform into 6^10^-5. Can you tell me where I'm wrong? OA is C. Thanks
Source: GMATPrep Question Pack 1
(1) doesn't give us any information about the upper boundary of y, so there's no way it's sufficient by itself: eliminate A and D.
(2) gives us an upper boundary on y AND we already know that x > 0, so it's actually possible that (2) is sufficient alone. Time to pick up your pencil and do some long division!
1/15000 = 1 divided by 15000 = .00006666 (and so on...)
Since x must be greater than 0, we know that y - x is less than .000066 - 0 or:
y - x < .000066. Could it be less than .00005? YES. Could it be greater than .00005? YES. Accordingly, (2) is insufficient: eliminate B.
Since we need to combine, let's calculate the limit on x:
1/60000 = 1 divided by 60000 = .0000166 (6s going on forever).
To get the limit on the biggest possible value of y-x, we choose the biggest possible y and the smallest possible x, i.e. y=.000066 and x=.000016. Since .000066 - .000016 = .00005, y-x MUST be less than .00005. Together sufficient, choose C!
The quicker you can do the long division, the quicker you can answer the question (I brute forced it in about 75 seconds).
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course