Dear Friends,
I was having problems in answering the following question.
In California today, Hispanics under the age of eighteen account for more than 43
percent, compared with a decade ago, when it was about 35 percent.
A. In California today, Hispanics under the age of eighteen account for more than 43
percent, compared with a decade ago, when it was about 35 percent.
B. Of the Californians under the age of eighteen, today more than 43 percent of them are
Hispanic, compared with a decade ago, when it was about 35 percent.
C. Today, more than 43 percent of Californians under the age of eighteen are Hispanic,
compared with about 35 percent a decade ago.
D. Today, compared to a decade ago, Californians who are Hispanics under the age of
eighteen account for more than 43 percent, whereas it was about 35 percent.
E. Today, Hispanics under the age of eighteen in California account for more than 43
percent, unlike a decade ago, when it was about 35 percent.
Please help.
OA after some discussions.
My choice was option C
Regards
Deano.
Hispanics
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 8:40 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:690
- amit2k9
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 9:09 am
- Location: pune
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:3 members
A,E does not specify percentage of what ? population or it can be anything.Eliminated.
B compares 43% with decade. hence eliminated.
D uses double comparison between today and decade as well as between 43 and 35 %. hence eliminated.
C is the correct usage here.
B compares 43% with decade. hence eliminated.
D uses double comparison between today and decade as well as between 43 and 35 %. hence eliminated.
C is the correct usage here.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)
- tuanquang269
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 5:10 am
- Location: Vietnam
- Thanked: 10 times
- Followed by:5 members
Although I am not confident too much in D, it is my final answer choice.Dean Jones wrote:Dear Friends,
I was having problems in answering the following question.
In California today, Hispanics under the age of eighteen account for more than 43
percent, compared with a decade ago, when it was about 35 percent.
A. In California today, Hispanics under the age of eighteen account for more than 43
percent, compared with a decade ago, when it was about 35 percent.=> 43% compare with a decade ago
B. Of the Californians under the age of eighteen, today more than 43 percent of them are
Hispanic, compared with a decade ago, when it was about 35 percent.=> Hispanic compare with a decade ago
C. Today, more than 43 percent of Californians under the age of eighteen are Hispanic,
compared with about 35 percent a decade ago. => "Hispanic" compared with "35%"
D. Today, compared to a decade ago, Californians who are Hispanics under the age of
eighteen account for more than 43 percent, whereas it was about 35 percent.
E. Today, Hispanics under the age of eighteen in California account for more than 43
percent, unlike a decade ago, when it was about 35 percent. => 43% unlike a decade ago
Please help.
OA after some discussions.
My choice was option C
Regards
Deano.
- VivianKerr
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Thanked: 474 times
- Followed by:365 members
The problem with A is that they account for "more than 43 percent." But "43 percent" of what, exactly? We're missing a comparison, and E has the same issue.
B - "when it was" disrupts the comparison, and the modification in the first clause if awkward
C - Correctly compares "43 percent today" with "35 percent a decade ago"
D - We want to compare the FIGURES not the time periods.
B - "when it was" disrupts the comparison, and the modification in the first clause if awkward
C - Correctly compares "43 percent today" with "35 percent a decade ago"
D - We want to compare the FIGURES not the time periods.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles
Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]
Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"!
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles
Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]
Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"!
- tuanquang269
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 5:10 am
- Location: Vietnam
- Thanked: 10 times
- Followed by:5 members
Thank for explanation. Can you give more example relating to the kind of comparison like this?VivianKerr wrote:The problem with A is that they account for "more than 43 percent." But "43 percent" of what, exactly? We're missing a comparison, and E has the same issue.
B - "when it was" disrupts the comparison, and the modification in the first clause if awkward
C - Correctly compares "43 percent today" with "35 percent a decade ago"
D - We want to compare the FIGURES not the time periods.
- EducationAisle
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:42 pm
- Location: Bangalore, India
- Thanked: 91 times
- Followed by:46 members
One way to look at it is that it in A does not have any antecedent. it (a singular) cannot refer to Hispanics (plural), but even if this singular-plural issue was not there, A would still not have been correct, since we cannot compare Hispanics (people/species) with 35 percent (a percentage). Remember there always has to be an apples to apples comparison.
So, for example, following would have been correct:
In California today, the percentage of Hispanics under the age of eighteen is more than 43 , compared with a decade ago, when it was about 35.
In the above sentence, it correctly refers to percentage of Hispanics under the age of eighteen.
So, for example, following would have been correct:
In California today, the percentage of Hispanics under the age of eighteen is more than 43 , compared with a decade ago, when it was about 35.
In the above sentence, it correctly refers to percentage of Hispanics under the age of eighteen.
Ashish
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com
Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:
a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana
b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana
Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com
Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:
a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana
b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana
Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 3:33 pm
found another nice explanation by Ron
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/in- ... t5783.html
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/in- ... t5783.html
-----------
https://www.collegekart.com
https://www.collegekart.com
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 8:40 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:690