Each employee on a certain task force is either a manager or a director. What percent of the employees on the task force are directors?
(1) The average (arithmetic mean) salary of the managers on the task force is $5000 less than the average salary of all employees on the task force.
(2) The average (arithmetic mean) salary of the managers on the task force is $15000 greater than the average salary of all employees on the task force.
Can anyone give me an explanation of the answer? (C)
Help Please on this DS question
This topic has expert replies
This problem too:
The cost of a square slab is proportional to its thickness and also proportional to the square of its length. What is the cost of a square slab that is 3 meters long and 0.1 meters thick?
(1) The cost of a square slab that is 2 meters long and 0.2 meter thick is $160 more than the cost of square slab that is 2 meters long and 0.1 meter thick.
(2) The cost of a square slab that is 3 meters long and 0.1 meter thick is $200 more than the cost of square slab that is 2 meters long and 0.1 meter thick
(answer is D)
The cost of a square slab is proportional to its thickness and also proportional to the square of its length. What is the cost of a square slab that is 3 meters long and 0.1 meters thick?
(1) The cost of a square slab that is 2 meters long and 0.2 meter thick is $160 more than the cost of square slab that is 2 meters long and 0.1 meter thick.
(2) The cost of a square slab that is 3 meters long and 0.1 meter thick is $200 more than the cost of square slab that is 2 meters long and 0.1 meter thick
(answer is D)
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
- Thanked: 173 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:710
this one uses Weighted average concept.nz11 wrote:Each employee on a certain task force is either a manager or a director. What percent of the employees on the task force are directors?
(1) The average (arithmetic mean) salary of the managers on the task force is $5000 less than the average salary of all employees on the task force.
(2) The average (arithmetic mean) salary of the DIRECTORS on the task force is $15000 greater than the average salary of all employees on the task force.
Can anyone give me an explanation of the answer? (C)
Nm * Am + Nd * Ad =( Nm +Nd) *T
where Am, Ad, T denotes respective salaries & Nm ,Nd denote their numbers.
frm st 1 wkt; Am = T-5000 & frm st 2 we know that; Ad= T+15000
Use the above 2 values in the main equation and solve for Nd/Nm & then find Nd/(Nm+Nd) which the prompt asks for.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 7:59 am
- Location: Seattle, WA
- Thanked: 86 times
- Followed by:2 members
cost (C) = k (thickness * length^2) or C = k.T.L^2
where thickness = T and length = L and K = constant
we need to find the cost of sq slab 3 mts long and 0.1 mts thick so C = k.(0.1) * (3^2)
or C = 0.9k
stat 1: 0.8k - 160 = 0.4k or k = 400
hence sufficient to find C
stat 2: 0.9k - 200 = 0.5k or k =400
again sufficient to find C
thus answer = D each statement alone sufficient to find the solution
where thickness = T and length = L and K = constant
we need to find the cost of sq slab 3 mts long and 0.1 mts thick so C = k.(0.1) * (3^2)
or C = 0.9k
stat 1: 0.8k - 160 = 0.4k or k = 400
hence sufficient to find C
stat 2: 0.9k - 200 = 0.5k or k =400
again sufficient to find C
thus answer = D each statement alone sufficient to find the solution
nz11 wrote:This problem too:
The cost of a square slab is proportional to its thickness and also proportional to the square of its length. What is the cost of a square slab that is 3 meters long and 0.1 meters thick?
(1) The cost of a square slab that is 2 meters long and 0.2 meter thick is $160 more than the cost of square slab that is 2 meters long and 0.1 meter thick.
(2) The cost of a square slab that is 3 meters long and 0.1 meter thick is $200 more than the cost of square slab that is 2 meters long and 0.1 meter thick
(answer is D)
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 7:59 am
- Location: Seattle, WA
- Thanked: 86 times
- Followed by:2 members
given n>0, t>0 to find greatest prime factor of nt
stat 1: gcf of n and t = 5 states that 5 is the largest number that divides both numbers n and t completely. it doesn't comment on the greatest prime factor of each number n and t which can vary with different numbers. hence not sufficient
stat 2: LCM of n and t = 105. prime factors of 105 = 3*5*7
largest prime factor of lcm of 2 nos = largest prime factor of product of 2 numbers n and t (ie n*t)
hence largest prime factor of nt = 7
sufficient
statement B alone is sufficient.
stat 1: gcf of n and t = 5 states that 5 is the largest number that divides both numbers n and t completely. it doesn't comment on the greatest prime factor of each number n and t which can vary with different numbers. hence not sufficient
stat 2: LCM of n and t = 105. prime factors of 105 = 3*5*7
largest prime factor of lcm of 2 nos = largest prime factor of product of 2 numbers n and t (ie n*t)
hence largest prime factor of nt = 7
sufficient
statement B alone is sufficient.
nz11 wrote:and this problem:
If n and t are positive integers, what is the greatest prime factor of the product nt?
(1) The greatest common factor of n and t is 5
(2) The least common multiple of n and t is 105
(answer is B)