Harvest

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:42 pm
Location: Paris, France
Thanked: 71 times
Followed by:17 members
GMAT Score:710

Harvest

by gmat740 » Wed Aug 12, 2009 10:08 am
A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only fifteen inches apart, instead of the usual thirty inches. Corn planted this closely will produce lower yields per plant. Nevertheless, the new machine will allow corn growers to double their profits per acre because __________.

(A) with the closer spacing of the rows, the growing corn plants will quickly form a dense canopy of leaves, which will, by shading the ground, minimize the need for costly weed control and irrigation
(B) with the closer spacing of the rows, corn plants will be forced to grow taller because of increased competition for sunlight from neighboring corn plants
(C) with the larger number of plants growing per acre, more fertilizer will be required
(D) with the spacing between rows cut by half, the number of plants grown per acre will almost double
(E) with the closer spacing of the rows, the acreage on which corn is planted will be utilized much more intensively than it was before, requiring more frequent fallow years in which corn fields are left unplanted

OA-A

Thanks Guys for discussion.
Last edited by gmat740 on Wed Aug 12, 2009 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:55 am
Thanked: 17 times

by madhur_ahuja » Wed Aug 12, 2009 10:24 am
IMO A. A gives proper reasoning for increasing profits.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 208
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 11:32 am
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 2 times

by vikram_k51 » Wed Aug 12, 2009 10:28 am
A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only fifteen inches apart, instead of the usual thirty inches. Corn planted this closely will produce lower yields per plant. Nevertheless, the new machine will allow corn growers to double their profits per acre because __________.

(A) with the closer spacing of the rows, the growing corn plants will quickly form a dense canopy of leaves, which will, by shading the ground, minimize the need for costly weed control and irrigation
(B) with the closer spacing of the rows, corn plants will be forced to grow taller because of increased competition for sunlight from neighboring corn plants
(C) with the larger number of plants growing per acre, more fertilizer will be required
(D) with the spacing between rows cut by half, the number of plants grown per acre will almost double
(E) with the closer spacing of the rows, the acreage on which corn is planted will be utilized much more intensively than it was before, requiring more frequent fallow years in which corn fields are left unplanted

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 2567
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:05 am
Thanked: 712 times
Followed by:550 members
GMAT Score:770

by DanaJ » Wed Aug 12, 2009 10:33 am
I'd have to go with A on this one. The argument clearly talks about profits and when profits come into discussion in the GMAT more often than not their increase comes as a result of lowering costs. I think it's sort of a little trick: the most obvious reason for profits to go up would be increased revenue, so they test the more subtle reason.

The doubling of plants is not important, since it's not the plants themselves that interest farmers, but rather their yield [side note: yield is the weirdest word in the English language].
Last edited by DanaJ on Wed Aug 12, 2009 10:49 am, edited 1 time in total.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:55 am
Thanked: 17 times

by madhur_ahuja » Wed Aug 12, 2009 10:35 am
DanaJ wrote:I'd have to go with A on this one. The argument clearly talks about profits and when profits come into discussing in the GMAT more often than not their increase comes as a result of lowering costs. I think it's sort of a little trick: the most obvious reason for profits to go up would be increased revenue, so they test the more subtle reason.

The doubling of plants is not important, since it's not the plants themselves that interest farmers, but rather their yield [side note: yield is the weirdest word in the English language].
To add to DanaJ, It is already given that
Corn planted this closely will produce lower yields per plant

The only strong contender D , is eliminated on basis of this statement.

Legendary Member
Posts: 527
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:14 am
Location: Atlanta
Thanked: 17 times

by pandeyvineet24 » Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:51 pm
A for me. Another key word in the answer choice A is "minimize".

Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

by mehravikas » Wed Aug 12, 2009 3:37 pm
IMO - A

Reasons - same as above

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 393
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:18 pm
Location: Chicago
Thanked: 8 times

by riteshbindal » Wed Aug 12, 2009 4:13 pm
IMO A

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 177
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 11:06 am
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by perfectstranger » Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:35 pm
Why A ? No one explained this one deeply.
Please do not post answers visibly . Please hide them or post them later after the discussion.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 101
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:14 am
Thanked: 2 times

by Spring2009 » Sun Aug 16, 2009 6:53 pm
A is very clear! "A" says that the cost can minimize, and you know that when costs reduce, the profit will increase (if revenue is unchanged). This explains why the profits double.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

by goelmohit2002 » Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:16 pm
Can someone please tell how A will lead to double the profits as argument says...

"the new machine will allow corn growers to double their profits per acre "..

i am able to understand A will lead to increase in profits....but how it will lead to double...can someone please tell ?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 6:41 am
Thanked: 8 times

IMO

by enniguy » Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:55 pm
goelmohit2002 wrote:Can someone please tell how A will lead to double the profits as argument says...

"the new machine will allow corn growers to double their profits per acre "..

i am able to understand A will lead to increase in profits....but how it will lead to double...can someone please tell ?
IMO that's just a figure given to support that yield or the profits will increase and not decrease. The number by itself is unimportant.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

Re: IMO

by goelmohit2002 » Sat Aug 29, 2009 7:24 am
enniguy wrote:
goelmohit2002 wrote:Can someone please tell how A will lead to double the profits as argument says...

"the new machine will allow corn growers to double their profits per acre "..

i am able to understand A will lead to increase in profits....but how it will lead to double...can someone please tell ?
IMO that's just a figure given to support that yield or the profits will increase and not decrease. The number by itself is unimportant.
oh ok thx.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:23 am

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 9:29 pm
Answer A seems to be logical one out of other answer choices