Ecologist: While many consumers are thrilled that gourmet hamburgers cost them as little as $4, they would surely change their tune if they knew the true economic cost of a hamburger, which, through its impact on the environment and its contribution to our skyrocketing national health care costs, actually has a net cost to society of over $200.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
The $200 cost is actually paid by the consumer.
If the actual cost of a hamburger to society were only $4, its purchase would be nutritionally and economically justified.
Consumers care about the costs that their decisions impose on society.
Hamburgers could be produced at a cost to society less than $200.
No hamburger costs less than $4.
hamburger to society
This topic has expert replies
- anuprajan5
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:56 pm
- Thanked: 60 times
- Followed by:10 members
The answer is C because the argument assumes that the consumers will change their tune if they knew the net cost. This is based on the assumption that they actually care.
Regards
Anup
The only lines that matter - are the ones you make!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kk4sZcG ... ata_player
Anup
The only lines that matter - are the ones you make!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kk4sZcG ... ata_player