Guy's net income

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 941
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:28 am
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:1 members

Guy's net income

by bhumika.k.shah » Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:45 am
Guy's net income equals his gross income minus his deductions. By what percent did Guy's net income change on January 1, 1989, when both his gross income and his deductions increased?

(1) Guy's gross income increased by 4 percent on
January 1, 1989.
(2) Guy's deductions increased by 15 percent on
January 1, 1989.

What are the things required here to answer the question directly before getting into equations and blah!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 182
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:09 pm
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

by akahuja143 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:54 am
my pick would E.


We would need to know his gross income in 1989 or in any of the years and deductions in one of the year..

A . we don't anything about the deduction

B, don't know anything about the income

Together say X id the income in 1989 then next income would be 1.04x
Say Y is the deduction then new deduction would be 1.15Y

Net income in 1989 = X-Y
next year it 1.04x- 1.15y;
change 1.04x -1.15y-(x-Y)

percent would be .04x -0.l15y/ x-y *100 == equation cannot be solved -- hence E

Hope it helps

Legendary Member
Posts: 941
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:28 am
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:1 members

by bhumika.k.shah » Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:56 am
Is there a way by plugging #s???
akahuja143 wrote:my pick would E.


We would need to know his gross income in 1989 or in any of the years and deductions in one of the year..

A . we don't anything about the deduction

B, don't know anyzthing about the income

Together say X id the income in 1989 then next income would be 1.04x
Say Y is the deduction then new deduction would be 1.15Y

Net income in 1989 = X-Y
next year it 1.04x- 1.15y;
change 1.04x -1.15y-(x-Y)

percent would be .04x -0.l15y/ x-y *100 == equation cannot be solved -- hence E

Hope it helps

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1275
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:13 pm
Location: Arabian Sea
Thanked: 125 times
Followed by:2 members

by ajith » Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:00 am
bhumika.k.shah wrote:
What are the things required here to answer the question directly before getting into equations and blah!
Gross Income - Deductions = Net Income

Say 1000 Dollars is gross income 500 dollars deductions ; net income = 500 dollars

1. Insufficient
2. Insufficient

Both together is also not sufficient since we do not know what the Deductions/Gross Income ratio earlier.
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 659
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:12 am
Thanked: 32 times
Followed by:3 members

by Gurpinder » Mon Aug 08, 2011 12:23 pm
ajith wrote: Both together is also not sufficient since we do not know what the Deductions/Gross Income ratio earlier.
Can someone please explain the above. What ratio is he talking about?
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1275
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:13 pm
Location: Arabian Sea
Thanked: 125 times
Followed by:2 members

by ajith » Mon Aug 08, 2011 1:05 pm
Gurpinder wrote:
Can someone please explain the above. What ratio is he talking about?
Consider 2 cases, Gross income was 100 and Net Deductions were 10 (Gross income to Deduction ratio =10)
Gross income was 200 and deductions were 10 ((Gross income to Deduction ratio = 20)

The net income increase in both cases are different even after using (1) and (2)together

Now, if the Gross income to Deduction ratio was constant, using (1) and (2) we could have found out the net income increase in percentage but, it is not indicated in the question, hence E
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 540
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:24 pm
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:6 members

by navami » Tue Aug 09, 2011 5:25 am
E is the answer.

Lets say I have 100 rupees and I give 20 rupees as donation . How much I am left out with ??? ANS : 80

Now lets assume .
100 increases by 10 % and my donation increases by 30% . we can still find out what I am left out with.

Now if we are unaware of figure 100 and donation 20 . will we be able to come to any conclusion?
This time no looking back!!!
Navami

Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Tue Aug 09, 2011 7:13 am
IMO E

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 659
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:12 am
Thanked: 32 times
Followed by:3 members

by Gurpinder » Tue Aug 09, 2011 8:59 am
ajith wrote:
Gurpinder wrote:
Can someone please explain the above. What ratio is he talking about?
Consider 2 cases, Gross income was 100 and Net Deductions were 10 (Gross income to Deduction ratio =10)
Gross income was 200 and deductions were 10 ((Gross income to Deduction ratio = 20)

The net income increase in both cases are different even after using (1) and (2)together

Now, if the Gross income to Deduction ratio was constant, using (1) and (2) we could have found out the net income increase in percentage but, it is not indicated in the question, hence E
Thank you!

Makes sense.
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 235
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:21 pm
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:5 members

by Anaira Mitch » Wed Nov 23, 2016 4:38 pm
Guy's net income equals his gross income minus his deductions. By what percent did Guy's net income change on January 1, 1989, when both his gross income and his deductions increased?

Given: Net Income = Gross Income - Deductions.

(1) Guy's gross income increased by 4 percent on January 1, 1989. No info about deductions. Not sufficient.
(2) Guy's deductions increased by 15 percent on January 1, 1989. No info about gross income. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) If Gross Income=100 and Deductions=100, then Guy had decrease in Net Income (since Deductions increased by greater percent than Gross Income) BUT if Gross Income=1,000 and Deductions=100, then Guy had some increase in Net Income. So, we cannot get the percent by which Guy's net income changed on January 1, 1989. Not sufficient.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2095
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
Thanked: 1443 times
Followed by:247 members

by ceilidh.erickson » Mon Nov 28, 2016 9:23 am
I've posted 3 different solutions to this problem here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/og2016-q69-t ... tml#770961
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education