Hi all,
720 is what I aimed for going into the exam. Unfortunately I got hammered on Quant and ended up with 690.
The schools I had in mind originally were MIT, Chicago, Ross and Yale. After see a score of 690, the list has become Ross, Yale, Darden and Johnson.
Should I retake the exam? I doubt that I will be able to score over 720 (which is 7% higher the percentage ranking than 690), and I really want to put more focus on the other admission components. However, is 700+ almost a requirement for the schools I'm applying to?
Little more on my backgound:
- 2 years exp in consulting
- Engineering - 3.8 GPA from a reputable university in Canada
Got beat - 690 (Q44, V40) - confused
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 11:25 pm
- Thanked: 9 times
- GMAT Score:730
I would def suggest a retake - if you can maintain the verbal score and improve the Quant scores.
However, if you think ( and I hope you dont) that your 40 in verbal was a fluke or the highest you've scores so far, then I would suggest giving teh retake a strong thought because the next time you could have a high quant and a messed up verbal - which shall push your scores down even further
Just my two cents. If I got a 690, I would retake - no question about that.
However, if you think ( and I hope you dont) that your 40 in verbal was a fluke or the highest you've scores so far, then I would suggest giving teh retake a strong thought because the next time you could have a high quant and a messed up verbal - which shall push your scores down even further
Just my two cents. If I got a 690, I would retake - no question about that.
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 8:59 am
also depends on the type of work and type of consulting.
top tier strategy consulting (mbb) might offset a lower gmat, while something like IT consulting probably would not.
top tier strategy consulting (mbb) might offset a lower gmat, while something like IT consulting probably would not.