Reptiles, by drawing their body heat directly from the Sun rather than burning calories to generate it, can survive on ten percent of the nourishment that a mammal of similar size would normally require.
A) rather than burning calories to generate it
B) rather than the generation of body heat by burning calories
C) and not from generating it by burning calories
D) instead of by burning calories for generating it
E) instead of body heat generated by burning calories
Apparently A is the correct answer, but I have hard time figuring it out.
According to me, the correct option should have been:
rather than by burning calories to generate it
Since A does not use "from", it's difficult to figure out whether the preposition should be "from" or "by".
Can an expert please help.
GMATPrep: Reptiles, by drawing their body heat
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:27 am
- Thanked: 7 times
by drawing... rather than... [by] burning
A) we don't have to repeat by
B)by drawing... rather than... the generation
Not parallel
C) and not from generating...not parallel
D) instead of by does not sound right.
E) It changes meaning. Body heat is a new term here. Eliminate.
So the answer is A
A) we don't have to repeat by
B)by drawing... rather than... the generation
Not parallel
C) and not from generating...not parallel
D) instead of by does not sound right.
E) It changes meaning. Body heat is a new term here. Eliminate.
So the answer is A
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 5:14 am
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:1 members
Thanks, as I had stated, A can be interpreted as:
Reptiles, by drawing their body heat directly from the Sun rather from than burning calories to generate it, can survive on ten percent of the nourishment that a mammal of similar size would normally require.
To me, this also sounds a logical interpretation. In other words, Reptiles draw their body heat directly from
a) Sun and not form
b) Burning calories
What's wrong with this interpretation?
Reptiles, by drawing their body heat directly from the Sun rather from than burning calories to generate it, can survive on ten percent of the nourishment that a mammal of similar size would normally require.
To me, this also sounds a logical interpretation. In other words, Reptiles draw their body heat directly from
a) Sun and not form
b) Burning calories
What's wrong with this interpretation?
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
In the OA, it refers to their body heat.iongmat wrote:Thanks, as I had stated, A can be interpreted as:
Reptiles, by drawing their body heat directly from the Sun rather from than burning calories to generate it, can survive on ten percent of the nourishment that a mammal of similar size would normally require.
To me, this also sounds a logical interpretation. In other words, Reptiles draw their body heat directly from
a) Sun and not form
b) Burning calories
What's wrong with this interpretation?
The interpretation above implies that reptiles are doing the following:
drawing their body heat directly from the sun rather than drawing their body heat from burning calories to generate their body heat.
The portion in red makes no sense.
The only viable interpretation is that reptiles prefer one METHOD of surviving (drawing) to ANOTHER (burning).
How can reptiles survive on so little nourishment?
by DRAWING their body heat directly from the sun rather than [by] BURNING calories to generate their body heat.
The preposition in brackets is omitted, but its presence is understood.
It is very common to omit a preposition after rather than.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 5:14 am
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:1 members
Thanks a lot Mitch. This totally clears it up.
And it also answers why "to generate it" is required here; else sentence might indeed have been ambiguous (the way I interpreted it).
And it also answers why "to generate it" is required here; else sentence might indeed have been ambiguous (the way I interpreted it).
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
A preposition must be followed by a NOUN serving as the OBJECT of the preposition.annays wrote:Hi Mitch, may I ask why choice D is wrong?
My consideration is to choose a better parallelism from A and D. For me, "By doing instead of by doing is very clear."
Thank you in advance.
Since instead of is a preposition, it may not be followed by a modifier such as by burning.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
How can one defend answer (A) as grammatically proper? It may be a better choice than any of the others, but nevertheless it translates to "Reptiles, by drawing their body heat directly from the Sun rather than burning calories to generate the Sun...," which is nonsense. Am I missing something?
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
OA: by drawing their body heat directly from the Sun rather than burning calories to generate itGee Matt wrote:How can one defend answer (A) as grammatically proper? It may be a better choice than any of the others, but nevertheless it translates to "Reptiles, by drawing their body heat directly from the Sun rather than burning calories to generate the Sun...," which is nonsense. Am I missing something?
Here, it serves to refer to their body heat.
Conveyed meaning:
by drawing their body heat directly from the Sun rather than burning calories to generate their body heat
This meaning is wholly logical.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
There is no ambiguity -- or sloppiness -- in the OA.Gee Matt wrote:I can see that, but seems like sloppy question writing by the exam writers.
Generally, rather than serves to connect PARALLEL FORMS.
Parallel forms must serve the SAME FUNCTION.
by drawing their body heat directly from the Sun rather than burning calories to generate it
Here, the pronoun in the blue phrase -- it -- is the direct object of a verb form (to generate).
Thus, the referent for it is clearly the preceding direct object in the red phrase (their body heat, the direct object of drawing).
In contrast:
by traveling away from the Sun rather than toward it
Here, the pronoun in the blue phrase -- it -- is the object of a preposition (toward).
Thus, the referent for it is clearly the preceding object of a preposition in the red phrase (the Sun, object of the preposition away from).
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
It is still not clear to me why exactly the preposition "by" does not have to be repeated to make the sentence parallel.
by X rather than by Y.
So,
BY drawing their body heat directly from the Sun rather than BY burning calories to generate it.
Can somebody please clarify?
by X rather than by Y.
So,
BY drawing their body heat directly from the Sun rather than BY burning calories to generate it.
Can somebody please clarify?
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
SEESAW conjunctions -- either X or Y, not X but Y, etc. -- must be carefully balanced.bobbyf wrote:It is still not clear to me why exactly the preposition "by" does not have to be repeated to make the sentence parallel.
by X rather than by Y.
So,
BY drawing their body heat directly from the Sun rather than BY burning calories to generate it.
Can somebody please clarify?
either FROM John or FROM Mary
not BY this week but BY next week.
Here, the prepositions in blue MUST be included to yield the required balance.
rather than does not constitute a seesaw conjunction and thus does not have to satisfy this constraint.
OA: by drawing their body heat directly from the Sun rather than burning calories to generate it
Here, it is NOT necessary to repeat by after rather than.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3