If n is a positive integer and r is the remainder when 4+7n is divided by 3 what is the value of r ?
(1) n+1 is divisible by 3
(2) n >20
Gmat prep remainder
This topic has expert replies
- rommysingh
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:33 am
- Thanked: 1 times
- Followed by:1 members
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Target question: What is the remainder when 7n+4 is divided by 3?rommysingh wrote:If n is a positive integer and r is the remainder when 4+7n is divided by 3 what is the value of r ?
(1) n+1 is divisible by 3
(2) n >20
Statement 1: n+1 is divisible by 3
Let's take our target expression (7n+4) and rewrite it as 3(2n+1) + (n+1)
This is useful, because we know that 3(2n+1) is divisible by 3.
Now statement 1 tells us that (n+1) is divisible by 3.
There's a nice rule that says, "If A is divisible by k, and B is divisible by k, then (A+B) is divisible by k."
So, we can conclude that 3(2n+1) + (n+1) is divisible by 3
This means that 7n+4 is divisible by 3
In other words, the remainder is zero when 7n+4 is divided by 3
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: n > 20
There are several values of n that satisfy this condition. Here are two:
Case a: n = 21, in which case, the remainder is one when 7n+4 is divided by 3
Case b: n = 22, in which case, the remainder is two when 7n+4 is divided by 3
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Answer = A
Cheers,
Brent
- MartyMurray
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:26 am
- Location: https://martymurraycoaching.com/
- Thanked: 955 times
- Followed by:140 members
- GMAT Score:800
Looking at Statement 1, you can see that any multiple of n + 1 will also be divisible by 3. So 2n + 2 is divisible by 3, 3n + 3 is divisible by 3, and so on.rommysingh wrote:If n is a positive integer and r is the remainder when 4+7n is divided by 3 what is the value of r ?
(1) n+1 is divisible by 3
(2) n >20
So when you see the 7n in the question you can think 7n + 7 is divisible by 3. Okay, so what about 7n + 4? Well 7n + 4 = (7n + 7) - 3. So if 7n + 7 is divisible by 3, then (7n + 7) - 3 = 7n + 4 is also divisible by 3, because 7n + 4 is 3 less than a multiple of 3.
Given that 7n + 4 is divisible by 3, dividing 7n + 4, or 4 + 7n, by 3 generates a remainder of 0.
So Statement 1 is sufficient.
Statement 2 might have been part of a C trap, but otherwise looks totally useless. Still I guess it makes sense to plug in some numbers to confirm that.
If n = 30, 4 + 7n = 214. 210 is a multiple of 3. So dividing 214 by 3 generates a remainder of 1.
If n = 40, 4 + 7n = 284. 282 is a multiple of 3, as determined by adding 2 + 8 + 2 and getting 12, which is a multiple of 3. So dividing 284 by 3 generates a remainder of 2.
So using Statement 2 one can generate various remainders, and Statement 2 is insufficient.
Maybe even checking Statement 2 is a waste of time as it seems pretty obvious that it is insufficient, but maybe it makes sense to be careful, as when one is under the pressure of taking the test one can come to some funny conclusions sometimes.
In any case the answer to this question is A.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2015 12:04 pm
Marty/Brent,
In the first statement, you showed why it's sufficient. In the second one, you plugged in numbers. How did you know to plug in numbers? Why didn't you do that for statement 1?
In the first statement, you showed why it's sufficient. In the second one, you plugged in numbers. How did you know to plug in numbers? Why didn't you do that for statement 1?
- DavidG@VeritasPrep
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
- Location: Boston, MA
- Thanked: 1153 times
- Followed by:128 members
- GMAT Score:770
The strategy you employ is a matter of taste/instinct. You certainly could pick numbers for statement 1.In the first statement, you showed why it's sufficient. In the second one, you plugged in numbers. How did you know to plug in numbers? Why didn't you do that for statement 1?
Say n + 1 = 3. Then n = 2. And 4 + 7n = 4 + 14 = 18, which gives a remainder of 0 when divided by 3.
Say n + 1 = 6. Then n = 5. And 4 + 7n = 4 + 35 = 39, which gives a remainder of 0 when divided by 3.
No matter what you pick, the remainder will be 0, so long as you satisfy statement 1.
Marty and Brent showed some neat approaches that can help you better understand number properties. Statement 2, on the other hand, is very open-ended, so it seemed logical to pick numbers. The best approach is the one that gets you to a correct answer in a reasonable amount of time.
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2015 12:04 pm
Thanks David!DavidG@VeritasPrep wrote:The strategy you employ is a matter of taste/instinct. You certainly could pick numbers for statement 1.In the first statement, you showed why it's sufficient. In the second one, you plugged in numbers. How did you know to plug in numbers? Why didn't you do that for statement 1?
Say n + 1 = 3. Then n = 2. And 4 + 7n = 4 + 14 = 18, which gives a remainder of 0 when divided by 3.
Say n + 1 = 6. Then n = 5. And 4 + 7n = 4 + 35 = 39, which gives a remainder of 0 when divided by 3.
No matter what you pick, the remainder will be 0, so long as you satisfy statement 1.
Marty and Brent showed some neat approaches that can help you better understand number properties. Statement 2, on the other hand, is very open-ended, so it seemed logical to pick numbers. The best approach is the one that gets you to a correct answer in a reasonable amount of time.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
As David says, The strategy you employ is a matter of taste/instinct.gmatbeater1989 wrote:Marty/Brent,
In the first statement, you showed why it's sufficient. In the second one, you plugged in numbers. How did you know to plug in numbers? Why didn't you do that for statement 1?
The problem with testing values for every statement is that the results are conclusive ONLY IF the statement is NOT SUFFICIENT.
So, it's best to test values when a statement doesn't feel sufficient. For more on this, read my article: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/articles/dat ... lug-values
Cheers,
Brent
- Max@Math Revolution
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 3991
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 2:28 am
- Location: Las Vegas, USA
- Thanked: 19 times
- Followed by:37 members
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.
If n is a positive integer and r is the remainder when 4+7n is divided by 3 what is the value of r ?
(1) n+1 is divisible by 3
(2) n >20
We solve remainder problems by directly substituting in values. Looking at the original condition, we can see that there is only 1 variable (n) We therefore need 1 equation, and 2 equations are given, so there is high chance (D) will be our answer.
From condition 1, n+1=3t(t is a positive integer), So n=3t-1=2,5,8,11,.......(directly substituted) Then 4+7n=18, 39, 60... All these values divided by 3 leave remainders of 0, so this is a sufficient condition.
For condition 2, n=21,22 and 4+7n=151, 158, and 151=3*50+1, so the remainder is 1, but for 158=3*52+2, the remainder is 2, and this is not unique, so this condition is insufficient and therefore the answer is (A).
For cases where we need 1 more equation, such as original conditions with "1 variable", or "2 variables and 1 equation", or "3 variables and 2 equations", we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 59 % chance that D is the answer, while A or B has 38% chance and C or E has 3% chance. Since D is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition. Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or E.
Math Revolution : Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare
The one-and-only World's First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy.
Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons - try it yourself (https://www.mathrevolution.com/gmat/lesson)
See our Youtube demo (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_Fki3_2vO8)
If n is a positive integer and r is the remainder when 4+7n is divided by 3 what is the value of r ?
(1) n+1 is divisible by 3
(2) n >20
We solve remainder problems by directly substituting in values. Looking at the original condition, we can see that there is only 1 variable (n) We therefore need 1 equation, and 2 equations are given, so there is high chance (D) will be our answer.
From condition 1, n+1=3t(t is a positive integer), So n=3t-1=2,5,8,11,.......(directly substituted) Then 4+7n=18, 39, 60... All these values divided by 3 leave remainders of 0, so this is a sufficient condition.
For condition 2, n=21,22 and 4+7n=151, 158, and 151=3*50+1, so the remainder is 1, but for 158=3*52+2, the remainder is 2, and this is not unique, so this condition is insufficient and therefore the answer is (A).
For cases where we need 1 more equation, such as original conditions with "1 variable", or "2 variables and 1 equation", or "3 variables and 2 equations", we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 59 % chance that D is the answer, while A or B has 38% chance and C or E has 3% chance. Since D is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition. Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or E.
Math Revolution : Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare
The one-and-only World's First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy.
Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons - try it yourself (https://www.mathrevolution.com/gmat/lesson)
See our Youtube demo (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_Fki3_2vO8)