• Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep

GMAT Prep Passage 5 | Question # 3

This topic has 1 expert reply and 1 member reply

Top Member

richachampion Legendary Member
Joined
21 Jul 2015
Posted:
697 messages
Followed by:
25 members
Thanked:
32 times
Test Date:
∞ →
Target GMAT Score:
760
GMAT Score:
740
Most Responsive Member

GMAT Prep Passage 5 | Question # 3

Post Wed Oct 12, 2016 2:35 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    The view has prevailed for the better part of the twentieth century that small firms do not perform an important role in Western economies. Official policies in many countries have favored large units of production because there were strong reasons to believe that large firms were superior to small firms in virtually every aspect of economic performance--productivity, technological progress, and job security and compensation. However, in the 1970s, evidence began to suggest that small firms in some countries were outperforming their larger counterparts. Perhaps the best example of this trend was in the steel industry, where new firms entered the market in the form of "mini-mills," and small-firm employment expanded, while many large companies shut down plants and reduced employment. Although no systematic evidence exists to determine unequivocally whether smaller units of production are as efficient as large firms or are, in fact, more efficient, some researchers have concluded that the accumulated evidence to date indicates that small firms are at least not burdened with an inherent size disadvantage.

    Thus, an alternative view has emerged in the economics literature, arguing that small firms make several important contributions to industrial markets. First, small firms are often the source of the kind of innovative activity that leads to technological change. Small firms generate market turbulence that creates additional dimensions of competition, and they also promote international competition through newly created niches. Finally, small firms in recent years have generated the preponderant share of new jobs.

    However, empirical knowledge about the relative roles of large and small firms is generally based upon anecdotal evidence and case studies, and such evidence has proved inadequate to answer major questions concerning the role of small firms across various industries and nations. An additional difficulty is that it is not obvious what criteria one should use to distinguish small firms from large ones. While a "small firm" is often defined as an enterprise with fewer than 500 employees, research studies of small firms use a wide variety of definitions.

    3. Which of the following best describes the organization of the first paragraph of the passage?
    A. A viewpoint is introduced, counter evidence is presented, and a new perspective is suggested.
    B. Opposing viewpoints are discussed, and evidence is provided that refutes both of those viewpoints.
    C. A hypothesis is described, supported with specific evidence, and then reaffirmed.
    D. An alternative viewpoint is presented, criticized, and dismissed in light of new evidence.
    E. Opposing viewpoints are presented, discussed, and then found to be more similar than previously supposed.



    OA: A

    All questions from this passage -
    GMAT Prep Passage 5|Question #1
    GMAT Prep Passage 5|Question #2
    GMAT Prep Passage 5|Question #3
    GMAT Prep Passage 5|Question #4

    _________________
    R I C H A,
    My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
    Target Score: 760+
    richacrunch2@gmail.com
    1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
    2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!

    Top Member

    richachampion Legendary Member
    Joined
    21 Jul 2015
    Posted:
    697 messages
    Followed by:
    25 members
    Thanked:
    32 times
    Test Date:
    ∞ →
    Target GMAT Score:
    760
    GMAT Score:
    740
    Most Responsive Member
    Post Fri Oct 21, 2016 5:17 am
    Bumping the thread for the experts review.

    _________________
    R I C H A,
    My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
    Target Score: 760+
    richacrunch2@gmail.com
    1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
    2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)

    Post Sun Nov 13, 2016 11:26 am
    richachampion wrote:
    The view has prevailed for the better part of the twentieth century that small firms do not perform an important role in Western economies. Official policies in many countries have favored large units of production because there were strong reasons to believe that large firms were superior to small firms in virtually every aspect of economic performance--productivity, technological progress, and job security and compensation. However, in the 1970s, evidence began to suggest that small firms in some countries were outperforming their larger counterparts. Perhaps the best example of this trend was in the steel industry, where new firms entered the market in the form of "mini-mills," and small-firm employment expanded, while many large companies shut down plants and reduced employment. Although no systematic evidence exists to determine unequivocally whether smaller units of production are as efficient as large firms or are, in fact, more efficient, some researchers have concluded that the accumulated evidence to date indicates that small firms are at least not burdened with an inherent size disadvantage.

    Thus, an alternative view has emerged in the economics literature, arguing that small firms make several important contributions to industrial markets. First, small firms are often the source of the kind of innovative activity that leads to technological change. Small firms generate market turbulence that creates additional dimensions of competition, and they also promote international competition through newly created niches. Finally, small firms in recent years have generated the preponderant share of new jobs.

    However, empirical knowledge about the relative roles of large and small firms is generally based upon anecdotal evidence and case studies, and such evidence has proved inadequate to answer major questions concerning the role of small firms across various industries and nations. An additional difficulty is that it is not obvious what criteria one should use to distinguish small firms from large ones. While a "small firm" is often defined as an enterprise with fewer than 500 employees, research studies of small firms use a wide variety of definitions.

    3. Which of the following best describes the organization of the first paragraph of the passage?
    A. A viewpoint is introduced, counter evidence is presented, and a new perspective is suggested.
    B. Opposing viewpoints are discussed, and evidence is provided that refutes both of those viewpoints.
    C. A hypothesis is described, supported with specific evidence, and then reaffirmed.
    D. An alternative viewpoint is presented, criticized, and dismissed in light of new evidence.
    E. Opposing viewpoints are presented, discussed, and then found to be more similar than previously supposed.



    OA: A

    All questions from this passage -
    GMAT Prep Passage 5|Question #1
    GMAT Prep Passage 5|Question #2
    GMAT Prep Passage 5|Question #3
    GMAT Prep Passage 5|Question #4
    First we get a viewpoint: The view has prevailed for the better part of the twentieth century that small firms do not perform an important role in Western economies.

    Next we get counter-evidence: However, in the 1970s, evidence began to suggest that small firms in some countries were outperforming their larger counterparts.

    Last, we get a new perspective: some researchers have concluded that the accumulated evidence to date indicates that small firms are at least not burdened with an inherent size disadvantage.

    The answer is A

    _________________
    Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

    Veritas Prep Reviews
    Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

    Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 lheiannie07 116 topics
    2 LUANDATO 62 topics
    3 swerve 62 topics
    4 ardz24 61 topics
    5 AAPL 58 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    172 posts
    2 image description Scott@TargetTestPrep

    Target Test Prep

    154 posts
    3 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    131 posts
    4 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    127 posts
    5 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    125 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts