Hi,
I understand that schools take the highest GMAT score. However do they form a negative or positive opinion by looking at the GMAT curve, i.e.
600 -> 650 -> 680 -> 730 (+ve)
670 -> 720 > 660 (-ve)
680 -> 700 -> 650 -> 700 (+ve or -ve or neutral ?)
640 -> 710 -> 680 -> 730 (+ve or neutral ?)
In other words, does an ever rising curve resonate more with admission officers irrespective of actual GMAT score (assuming the minimum score obtained is at least 600) ? Would they look at curves at all ? Also does the curve make a difference to companies recruiting at B-school irrespective of highest ?
Thanks.
GMAT exam curve
This topic has expert replies
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:53 am
- Thanked: 1 times
- David@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2193
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pm
- Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
- Thanked: 1186 times
- Followed by:512 members
- GMAT Score:770
Two things:
1) your score is your score. So just because you have improved 30 points every time they will not look at your score and say that your 680 is really a 710.
2) In your example the GMAT is taken 4 times by the applicant.
My understanding is that you would want to show improvement if you were taking the GMAT that many times. Otherwise it looks a bit like you are hoping to get lucky and in fact "fishing" for a score.
Certainly the first scenario is the easiest to explain if you are asked!
1) your score is your score. So just because you have improved 30 points every time they will not look at your score and say that your 680 is really a 710.
2) In your example the GMAT is taken 4 times by the applicant.
My understanding is that you would want to show improvement if you were taking the GMAT that many times. Otherwise it looks a bit like you are hoping to get lucky and in fact "fishing" for a score.
Certainly the first scenario is the easiest to explain if you are asked!