Distressed by his own personal tragedies, the Roman philosopher Cicero once asked himself whether a wise person should try to achieve the Stoic ideal of complete emotionlessness. Cicero reasoned that, however desirable the goal may be, a wise person could never attain it, since emotions are not simply irrational urges. They are, rather, a product of one's estimate of the goodness and badness of the events, people, and actions one witnesses.
Which of the following is an assumption required by Cicero's reasoning?
A. Wise people inevitably evaluate at least some of the things they observe.
B. Irrationality makes evolution of what one observes impossible.
C. Wisdom precludes attempting to attain what one cannot.
D. If evaluations are based only on reason, the they are inaccurate.
E. A wise person will not evaluate what cannot be directly observed.
Dear GMATGuru,
Can you help with this question?
GMAT advanced - Assumption - Distressed by his own personal
This topic has expert replies
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Premise:Mo2men wrote:Distressed by his own personal tragedies, the Roman philosopher Cicero once asked himself whether a wise person should try to achieve the Stoic ideal of complete emotionlessness. Cicero reasoned that, however desirable the goal may be, a wise person could never attain it, since emotions are not simply irrational urges. They are, rather, a product of one's estimate of the goodness and badness of the events, people, and actions one witnesses.
Which of the following is an assumption required by Cicero's reasoning?
A. Wise people inevitably evaluate at least some of the things they observe.
B. Irrationality makes evolution of what one observes impossible.
C. Wisdom precludes attempting to attain what one cannot.
D. If evaluations are based only on reason, the they are inaccurate.
E. A wise person will not evaluate what cannot be directly observed.
Emotions are the product of ONE'S estimate of the goodness and badness of the events, people, and actions one witnesses.
Conclusion:
A WISE PERSON could never attain complete emotionless.
Whereas the premise is about ONE, the conclusion is about A WISE PERSON.
Assumption:
A WISE PERSON = ONE.
Apply the negation test.
When the correct answer is negated, the conclusion will be invalidated.
A, negated:
Wise people inevitably do NOT evaluate at least some of the things they observe.
Here, a wise person does NOT estimate the goodness and badness of witnessed events.
Since there is no estimation, there is no product -- in other words, there are no EMOTIONS.
As a result, the negation of A invalidates the conclusion that a wise person cannot attain emotionless.
Since the negation of A invalidates the conclusion, A is an ASSUMPTION: a statement that must be true for the conclusion to hold.
The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:39 am
- Thanked: 14 times
- Followed by:5 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Hi GMATGuru,GMATGuruNY wrote:Premise:Mo2men wrote:Distressed by his own personal tragedies, the Roman philosopher Cicero once asked himself whether a wise person should try to achieve the Stoic ideal of complete emotionlessness. Cicero reasoned that, however desirable the goal may be, a wise person could never attain it, since emotions are not simply irrational urges. They are, rather, a product of one's estimate of the goodness and badness of the events, people, and actions one witnesses.
Which of the following is an assumption required by Cicero's reasoning?
A. Wise people inevitably evaluate at least some of the things they observe.
B. Irrationality makes evolution of what one observes impossible.
C. Wisdom precludes attempting to attain what one cannot.
D. If evaluations are based only on reason, the they are inaccurate.
E. A wise person will not evaluate what cannot be directly observed.
Emotions are the product of ONE'S estimate of the goodness and badness of the events, people, and actions one witnesses.
Conclusion:
A WISE PERSON could never attain complete emotionless.
Whereas the premise is about ONE, the conclusion is about A WISE PERSON.
Assumption:
A WISE PERSON = ONE.
Apply the negation test.
When the correct answer is negated, the conclusion will be invalidated.
A, negated:
Wise people inevitably do NOT evaluate at least some of the things they observe.
Here, a wise person does NOT estimate the goodness and badness of witnessed events.
Since there is no estimation, there is no product -- in other words, there are no EMOTIONS.
As a result, the negation of A invalidates the conclusion that a wise person cannot attain emotionless.
Since the negation of A invalidates the conclusion, A is an ASSUMPTION: a statement that must be true for the conclusion to hold.
The correct answer is A.
Why choices B & E are wrong?
It is so hard to reject them. what are the basis to reject them?
If I negate E : A wise person will evaluate what cannot be directly observed.
I feel the negation goes against the premise which is not allowed in an argument. Is my reasoning correct?
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Mo2men wrote:B: Irrationality makes evaluation of what one observes impossible.GMATGuruNY wrote:Hi GMATGuru,Mo2men wrote:Distressed by his own personal tragedies, the Roman philosopher Cicero once asked himself whether a wise person should try to achieve the Stoic ideal of complete emotionlessness. Cicero reasoned that, however desirable the goal may be, a wise person could never attain it, since emotions are not simply irrational urges. They are, rather, a product of one's estimate of the goodness and badness of the events, people, and actions one witnesses.
Which of the following is an assumption required by Cicero's reasoning?
A. Wise people inevitably evaluate at least some of the things they observe.
B. Irrationality makes evaluation of what one observes impossible.
C. Wisdom precludes attempting to attain what one cannot.
D. If evaluations are based only on reason, the they are inaccurate.
E. A wise person will not evaluate what cannot be directly observed.
Why choices B & E are wrong?
It is so hard to reject them. what are the basis to reject them?
Irrationality is irrelevant, since -- according to the passage -- emotions are NOT irrational urges.
Also, the red portion seems to contradict the PREMISE that emotions are yielded when one estimates the goodness and badness of witnessed events.
A premise is a FACT: it cannot be contradicted.
Eliminate B.
Here, the red portion does seem to contradict the premise that emotions are yielded by events that are WITNESSED.If I negate E : A wise person will evaluate what cannot be directly observed.
I feel the negation goes against the premise which is not allowed in an argument. Is my reasoning correct?
Eliminate E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3