Federal Legislation

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:26 am
Location: New Jersey
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:660

Federal Legislation

by Sher1 » Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:20 am
Federal legislation establishing a fund for the cleanup of sites damaged by toxic chemicals permits compensating state governments for damage to their natural resources but does not allow claims for injury to people.
(A) compensating state governments for damage to
(B) compensating state governments for the damaging of
(C) giving state governments compensation for damaging
(D) giving compensation to state governments for the damage of
(E) the giving of compensation to state governments for damaging

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 129
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 9:12 am
Thanked: 8 times

by cata1yst » Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:31 am
I like A.

Permit X to...

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:26 am
Location: New Jersey
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:660

by Sher1 » Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:42 am
OA A

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 88
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:20 am
Thanked: 1 times

by Onell » Mon Dec 13, 2010 8:27 pm
cata1yst wrote:I like A.

Permit X to...
Hey ,
permit X to Y where X refers to agent and Y refers to action... In this case

X=compensating state governments for damage
Y=their natural resources....
Does n't it look crazy...... or am I missing sth?

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 181
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:06 pm
Thanked: 17 times
Followed by:1 members

by ikaplan » Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:30 pm
We have the command subjunctive here. To be more precise, it is the case when verbs only take infinitive. Such verbs include permit, advise, allow, want, persuade, forbid.

The structure of the sentence is: PERMIT sth/someone TO

In our case: PERMITS [compensating state governments for damage] TO

Does this makes sense to you?

If we use the elimination method we can discard C, D and E for redundancy (they feature both give +compensation); on the contrary, A and B use a single verb to describe that action.

B is incorrect because of the parallelism issue: 'damaging' v.s 'claims (in order to be parallel, it should be 'for claiming').
"Commitment is more than just wishing for the right conditions. Commitment is working with what you have."