Explanation requested

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:32 pm
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

Explanation requested

by smagish » Mon Jul 16, 2012 9:56 am
In the late seventh century, in a dispute over whether the Prophet Muhammad's
son-in-law, Ali, should carry on as the fourth caliph, Muhammad's successor,
Islam split into two branches, the Sunnis and the Shiites.
(A) over whether the Prophet Muhammad's son-in-law, Ali, should carry on as
the fourth caliph, Muhammad's successor
(B) over if Ali, the Prophet Muhammad's son-in-law, was going to carry on and
be the fourth caliph, Muhammad's successor
(C) over whether Ali, the Prophet Muhammad's son-in-law, was going to carry on
and be the fourth caliph, Muhammad's successor
(D) as to whether the fourth caliph, Muhammad's successor, is to be the Prophet
Muhammad's son-in-low, Ali
(E) concerning if the fourth caliph, Muhammad's successor, was to be the Prophet
Muhammad's son-in-law, Ali


The OA is [/spoiler]A but i went for [spoiler]C

Thanks[/spoiler]

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:35 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:610

by karthikgmat » Mon Jul 16, 2012 9:49 pm
The problem with C is "was going to carry on and be the fourth caliph"