Elections, please help !

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pm
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

Elections, please help !

by heshamelaziry » Sat Oct 24, 2009 10:48 am
Marcia had overwhelming support from her party during the election, this partisan assistance enabled her to win handily.

this

of which

therefore

and this

so that

OA D


The OE says that these are two independant clauses and need to be joind with "AND". If they are independant, they should stand without "and". What is the difference here if there were a semicolon ?

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:51 am
Thanked: 10 times
GMAT Score:690

Re: Elections, please help !

by Ludacrispat26 » Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:18 am
heshamelaziry wrote:Marcia had overwhelming support from her party during the election, this partisan assistance enabled her to win handily.

this

of which

therefore

and this

so that

OA D


The OE says that these are two independant clauses and need to be joind with "AND". If they are independant, they should stand without "and". What is the difference here if there were a semicolon ?
Saying "Marcia had overwhelming support from her party during the election, this partisan assistance...." would be a clear run-on sentence. That would be two independent clauses without a conjunction or semicolon, which is definitionally a run-on.

Semi-colons enable you to have consecutive independent clauses without having to start a new sentence. Ex:

Mike really loved Shawna; her wit always brightened his day.

If we were to replace the semicolon with a comma, we'd have a run-on.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 371
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:48 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:740

by 2010gmat » Sat Oct 24, 2009 9:11 pm
@heshamelaziry

wats the cource for your questions? i really like the questions posted by you