Doctor and Lawyer

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:07 pm
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

Doctor and Lawyer

by mmon » Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:13 am
After many years of feeling separated by a great divide, the doctor now finds himself besides the lawyer, working with one another against HMOs and big tobacco.

A besides the lawyer, working with one another
B besides the lawyer, working with each other
C beside the lawyer, working with each other
D beside the lawyer, working with him
E beside the lawyer, working with one another

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 364
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:13 am
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:3 members

by FightWithGMAT » Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:07 am
IMO C

A and B are out because of "besides"
working is modifying the entire clause, and in the clause two person were mentioned.
So, "each other" fits well here.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 305
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 5:38 am
Thanked: 10 times

by Shawshank » Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:38 am
imo --C
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Shawshank Redemtion -- Hope is still alive ...

Legendary Member
Posts: 537
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:06 pm
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:1 members

by frank1 » Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:51 am
me three C....LOL

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 167
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:04 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by subgeeth » Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:54 am
IMO C as well

E is close but incorrect due to the following reason

Use each other when referring to two people. Use one another when referring to more than two people:
Example: The two friends embraced each other.
Example: The basketball team high-fived one another.
Still working on my dreams best part is I have not achieved one yet !!!!!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:07 pm
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by mmon » Tue Apr 20, 2010 7:55 pm
Thanks guys.
I chose C too.
OA is D
OE : Choice (C) can also be eliminated because it changes the correct one another (used when there are two nouns, as here) to each other (used with more than two nouns). However, there is another problem in the sentence. The subject of the sentence is the doctor . The doctor finds himself beside the lawyer and also working with the lawyer . It doesn't make sense to say that the doctor is... working with one another as the original sentence and Choice (E) say. Choice (D) working with him (the lawyer) is the only construction that makes sense.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:06 pm
Thanked: 7 times

by pops » Wed Apr 21, 2010 4:07 am
There are 2 opposite concepts given here.. please explain
each other, one another.. which is for 2 and which is for more than 2 ?

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 278
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:17 pm
Location: Bangalore,India
Thanked: 17 times

by loveusonu » Wed Apr 21, 2010 4:31 am
pops wrote:There are 2 opposite concepts given here.. please explain
each other, one another.. which is for 2 and which is for more than 2 ?
Pops,

Each other: means for inclusive i.e doctor and lawyer together.
Another: some third party only those 2.

IMO C
Sonu
--------
When you want something desperately, the whole Universe conspires in helping to give it to you - The Alchemist

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 364
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:13 am
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:3 members

by FightWithGMAT » Wed Apr 21, 2010 4:42 am
I read the concept in many places.

"Each other" for only 2 parties
"One another" for more than 2 parties involved

Nancy and Adam share every thing with each other.
The students in the class share the books with one another.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 613
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:17 am
Location: madrid
Thanked: 171 times
Followed by:64 members
GMAT Score:790

by kevincanspain » Wed Apr 21, 2010 9:31 am
working with... modifies the doctor, so it makes sense to say 'working with him, since the doctor is working with the lawyer
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 364
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:13 am
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:3 members

by FightWithGMAT » Wed Apr 21, 2010 11:55 am
kevincanspain wrote:working with... modifies the doctor, so it makes sense to say 'working with him, since the doctor is working with the lawyer
I am confused here-
X finds himself now beside Y ,working with each other for Z
Does ",working" not modify the entire clause "X finds himself now beside Y"

why working with pointing to X?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:26 am
Thanked: 16 times

by student22 » Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:08 pm
In this sentence, each other, would make the sentence nonsensical. It would imply that the doctor is working with HIMSELF and the lawyer to fight the HMOs.