This is from the GMATPrep:
The original price of a TV is discounted by X percent, and then reduced further by 2X percent. If P is the original price of the TV, which of the following represents the price of the TV after both discounts are applied?
A) P(1-.03X + .02X^2)
B) P(1-.03X + .0002X^2)
C) P(1-.03X + .002X^2)
D) P(1-2X^2)
E) P(1-3X+2X^2)
OA is B
My problem though is in the answer explanation:
It says as follows:
After the first discount the price of the TV was P(1-.01X)
And after the second discount the price was P(1-.01X)[1-(.01X)(2X)]
Then it goes on to expand and solve. My question is:
Why for the first reduction do we take X percent as ".01X" and then the during the second reduction take 2X percent as "2X"? SHouldn't it be .02X?
Thanks!
Discount of a TV
This topic has expert replies
- joshhowatt
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 12:53 pm
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Let P = 100joshhowatt wrote:This is from the GMATPrep:
The original price of a TV is discounted by X percent, and then reduced further by 2X percent. If P is the original price of the TV, which of the following represents the price of the TV after both discounts are applied?
A) P(1-.03X + .02X^2)
B) P(1-.03X + .0002X^2)
C) P(1-.03X + .002X^2)
D) P(1-2X^2)
E) P(1-3X+2X^2)
OA is B
Let X = 10.
Price after the first discount of 10% = 90.
Price after the second discount of 20% = 90 - 18 = 72. This is our target.
Now we plug P=100 and X=10 into the answers to see which yields our target of 72.
Only answer choice B works:
P(1 -. 03X + .0002X²) = 100(1 - (3/100)(10) + (2/10�)(10²)) = 100 - 30 + 2 = 72.
The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
- eagleeye
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2012 9:12 pm
- Thanked: 339 times
- Followed by:49 members
- GMAT Score:770
Hi joshhowatt:joshhowatt wrote:This is from the GMATPrep:
My problem though is in the answer explanation:
It says as follows:
After the first discount the price of the TV was P(1-.01X)
And after the second discount the price was P(1-.01X)[1-(.01X)(2X)]
Then it goes on to expand and solve. My question is:
Why for the first reduction do we take X percent as ".01X" and then the during the second reduction take 2X percent as "2X"? SHouldn't it be .02X?
Thanks!
Your thinking is correct.
If the first one is a reduction by x% , then price after that = P(1-x%)= P(1-0.01x)
Also, after the second reduction by 2x%, the price will be P(1-x%)(1-(2x)%) = P(1-0.01x)(1-0.02x)
When you expand P(1-0.01x)(1-0.02x) it indeed gives P(1-0.03x+0.0002x^2) which is the correct answer.
Let me know if this helps
Last edited by eagleeye on Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 4:24 pm
- Thanked: 13 times
- Followed by:1 members
Hi Mitch,
Which approach do you suggest...solving it algebraically or putting in number as you did.
I am more used to algebra than plugging in numbers.
But I think number plugging might be faster with some practice.
Thanks
Which approach do you suggest...solving it algebraically or putting in number as you did.
I am more used to algebra than plugging in numbers.
But I think number plugging might be faster with some practice.
Thanks
GMATGuruNY wrote:Let P = 100joshhowatt wrote:This is from the GMATPrep:
The original price of a TV is discounted by X percent, and then reduced further by 2X percent. If P is the original price of the TV, which of the following represents the price of the TV after both discounts are applied?
A) P(1-.03X + .02X^2)
B) P(1-.03X + .0002X^2)
C) P(1-.03X + .002X^2)
D) P(1-2X^2)
E) P(1-3X+2X^2)
OA is B
Let X = 10.
Price after the first discount of 10% = 90.
Price after the second discount of 20% = 90 - 18 = 72. This is our target.
Now we plug P=100 and X=10 into the answers to see which yields our target of 72.
Only answer choice B works:
P(1 -. 03X + .0002X²) = 100(1 - (3/100)(10) + (2/10�)(10²)) = 100 - 30 + 2 = 72.
The correct answer is B.
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button. Thanks