The announced relocation of the hospital has been welcome news for the city, where economic growth has been stagnant for the past several years.
city, where economic growth has been stagnant
city whose economic growth has been stagnant
city where economic growth has been stagnated
city, whose economic growth as been stagnated
city, the site of stagnated economic growth
Where vs Whose
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:690
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:50 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
It is the relocation of hospital that is in the city, so it is the city that should be addressed here.
In both a and c, where doesn't make sense.
d - wrong wording
e - changes the sentence
IMO B. What is the OA please?
In both a and c, where doesn't make sense.
d - wrong wording
e - changes the sentence
IMO B. What is the OA please?
Last edited by crackthetest on Mon Sep 21, 2009 3:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 1:01 pm
- Location: Chicago
- Thanked: 7 times
"whose" when refering to something tells something about the place,city, person...etc it is referring to.
"where" refers to a place like city, country etc
the sentence here is tell about a city and this city's "economic development has been stagnant". since "economic development has been stagnant" is describing city "whose" is correct
"the city where they plane was developed..."
"the city whose weather is fickle..."
I will go with B
Vinayak
"where" refers to a place like city, country etc
the sentence here is tell about a city and this city's "economic development has been stagnant". since "economic development has been stagnant" is describing city "whose" is correct
"the city where they plane was developed..."
"the city whose weather is fickle..."
I will go with B
Vinayak
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:32 pm
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:1 members
IMO A.crackgmat007 wrote:The announced relocation of the hospital has been welcome news for the city, where economic growth has been stagnant for the past several years.
city, where economic growth has been stagnant
city whose economic growth has been stagnant
city where economic growth has been stagnated
city, whose economic growth as been stagnated
city, the site of stagnated economic growth
B and C are incorrect. there is no comma between CITY and WHOSE.
E - THE SITE is unnecessary
Are you sure its AS is D? If its HAS, then the problem would be little difficult.
AS is incorrect - D out.
OA pls.
What we think, we become
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
- Thanked: 12 times
IMO Bcrackgmat007 wrote:The announced relocation of the hospital has been welcome news for the city, where economic growth has been stagnant for the past several years.
city, where economic growth has been stagnant
city whose economic growth has been stagnant
city where economic growth has been stagnated
city, whose economic growth as been stagnated
city, the site of stagnated economic growth
whose is more specific to address "city" as compared to where
whose can mean City's economic growth...
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:690
OA - A But was not sure whether my reasoning is correct.
IMO in 2, 'whose' can refer to 'city' (noun in the prep phrase 'for the city') or 'welcome news' noun phrase (direct object). Hence, A.
Can experts confirm this pls?
IMO in 2, 'whose' can refer to 'city' (noun in the prep phrase 'for the city') or 'welcome news' noun phrase (direct object). Hence, A.
Can experts confirm this pls?
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
- Thanked: 12 times
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 5:54 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
I still don't agree with A b/c "where / whose economic growth has been stagnant" is an essential modifier in this context and hence there shouldn't be a comma separating essential modifier. So of the two choice with no-commas, I would go with C but can't rule out B based on any error. Experts please correct if this reasoning is wrong.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Stacey Koprince
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2228
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
- Location: Montreal, Canada
- Thanked: 639 times
- Followed by:694 members
- GMAT Score:780
Received a PM asking me to reply. What is the source of this question?
I'm not a big fan of this question - aspects of it don't seem very GMAT-like to me. I'm technically not supposed to reply till we get a source, but I'll discuss briefly because it's been a while since the person who asked me to discuss this sent me the PM.
"whose" is the possessive form of a relative pronoun ("who" is the subjective form). Possessive implies ownership - specifically the noun before owns whatever is after the "whose." "The dog whose tail is wagging is happy to see you." The dog owns the wagging tail. Would it make sense to say that the city "owns" stagnating economic growth? Not exactly - so don't use "whose" here. Eliminate B and D.
A and C have two main differences: the comma (or absence thereof) and "stagnated" vs. "stagnant. This is where I don't like this question much, because I don't think the real GMAT would have these two choices together.
First, A uses a comma after city, so it's telling us that the stuff after city is a nonessential modifier. C doesn't use the comma, so it's saying that the stuff after city is an essential modifier. You can write this either way; it just depends what the sentence is trying to say. Judgment call - and we're supposed to go with the original meaning when there are two possible meanings. So go with nonessential. And as soon as you realize that, the problem is over, because only A preserves the original meaning. Not GMAT-like.
Second, "stagnated" is too obviously wrong. This isn't an idiom issue - they're just making up a word that might be a more common non-native speaker mistake (because the general rule for present perfect is has/have been + past participle, the most common form of which ends in -ed). Again, this is not how the test works - they're not especially trying to trap non-native speakers. Ditto E.
So, yes, A is the best choice on this one. But I don't think the lessons learned here are really the best ones to study for the GMAT.
I'm not a big fan of this question - aspects of it don't seem very GMAT-like to me. I'm technically not supposed to reply till we get a source, but I'll discuss briefly because it's been a while since the person who asked me to discuss this sent me the PM.
"whose" is the possessive form of a relative pronoun ("who" is the subjective form). Possessive implies ownership - specifically the noun before owns whatever is after the "whose." "The dog whose tail is wagging is happy to see you." The dog owns the wagging tail. Would it make sense to say that the city "owns" stagnating economic growth? Not exactly - so don't use "whose" here. Eliminate B and D.
A and C have two main differences: the comma (or absence thereof) and "stagnated" vs. "stagnant. This is where I don't like this question much, because I don't think the real GMAT would have these two choices together.
First, A uses a comma after city, so it's telling us that the stuff after city is a nonessential modifier. C doesn't use the comma, so it's saying that the stuff after city is an essential modifier. You can write this either way; it just depends what the sentence is trying to say. Judgment call - and we're supposed to go with the original meaning when there are two possible meanings. So go with nonessential. And as soon as you realize that, the problem is over, because only A preserves the original meaning. Not GMAT-like.
Second, "stagnated" is too obviously wrong. This isn't an idiom issue - they're just making up a word that might be a more common non-native speaker mistake (because the general rule for present perfect is has/have been + past participle, the most common form of which ends in -ed). Again, this is not how the test works - they're not especially trying to trap non-native speakers. Ditto E.
So, yes, A is the best choice on this one. But I don't think the lessons learned here are really the best ones to study for the GMAT.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!
Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT
Contributor to Beat The GMAT!
Learn more about me
Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT
Contributor to Beat The GMAT!
Learn more about me
- conquistador
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2014 4:00 am
- Thanked: 4 times
- Followed by:1 members
I feel city is metaphorical location and where is not preferred.crackgmat007 wrote:The announced relocation of the hospital has been welcome news for the city, where economic growth has been stagnant for the past several years.
city, where economic growth has been stagnant
city whose economic growth has been stagnant
city where economic growth has been stagnated
city, whose economic growth as been stagnated
city, the site of stagnated economic growth
Also OE says that whose is not correct here.
can someone explain?
Thinking too hard guys, the answer is A because B is missing the comma before whose. There's a big difference between "...the city, whose something..." and "...the city whose something..." which implies you can identify the single city with that property. Where and whose are both perfectly acceptable in this context and the GMAT doesn't test that distinction.
The car, which is red....
The car which is red....
In the first we are talking about a particular car which happens to have the property of being red. In the second we are identifying which car we are talking about. We can do that because there is only one red car.
The car, which is red....
The car which is red....
In the first we are talking about a particular car which happens to have the property of being red. In the second we are identifying which car we are talking about. We can do that because there is only one red car.