Charlie's company

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 162
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 8:33 pm
Location: San Jose,CA
Thanked: 1 times

Charlie's company

by ddm » Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:12 am
help
Attachments
5.JPG

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 6:16 pm
Thanked: 3 times

Re: Charlie's company

by dally_gmat » Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:51 am
IMO E

C and D are wrong and A and B does not talk about monetary factor..

What is OA?
ddm wrote:help

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Atlanta, USA
GMAT Score:480

by jeenashiva » Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:36 am
I will go with E.

What is the OA?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:57 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by nikhilagrawal » Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:53 pm
Ans D
it supports the economic decision

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 3:15 am
Thanked: 7 times
Followed by:1 members

by anju » Fri Sep 19, 2008 2:07 pm
IMO: E

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 43
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:20 pm
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:770

by Mustang » Fri Sep 19, 2008 5:55 pm
nikhilagrawal wrote:Ans D
it supports the economic decision
Although D supports the economic decision, it talks about "publicly traded companies". We cannot assume the particular company is publicly traded.

I think answers is E.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:57 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by nikhilagrawal » Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:15 pm
Mustang .... read the question stem:

Which of the following if true .... it means we can assume things outside the Premise

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:57 am
Thanked: 3 times

by abhi75 » Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:55 pm
The answer is D. It supports the conclusion that the company would be fine economically after 12 months even with the temporary losses of $5 million.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 162
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 8:33 pm
Location: San Jose,CA
Thanked: 1 times

by ddm » Fri Sep 19, 2008 10:27 pm
OA-E

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:57 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by nikhilagrawal » Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:42 am
DDm,
Can you pls post the reasoning also ..

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:18 pm
Thanked: 1 times

If E, here is my doubt...

by rprasanna » Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:14 am
what is the large punitive damages amount to less than 5 million dollars?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:23 am
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 2 times

by banker1 » Mon Sep 22, 2008 1:50 pm
I also chose E:

I was between (D) and (E). Look closely at the wording in (D) and you'll see why it's wrong.

Aside from the fact that we don't know if Charlie's company is public or not, The stocks of companies that announce recalls often drop initially but they generally return to pre-announcement levels within 12 months.

We want to support the recall being the best economic decision. That said, if stocks often drop there is still a possibility they will be uneffected. Conversely, if they generally return there is still a possibility the stocks don't recover.

There doesn't seem to be enough economic certainty with choice (D). Choice (E) on the other hand is clear, a rival which didn't announce a recall went out of business because of litigation.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 120
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 3:55 am

by john83.amar » Thu May 12, 2016 11:41 am
A seems to be the best choice here E