Cancer

New MBA Student Life Forum: Ask your questions to current MBA students from Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Kellogg and Haas

Post new topic   Reply to topic

kaulnikhil
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!



Joined: 17 Apr 2009
Posts: 165

Thanks given: 6
Thanked 7 times in 7 posts

Target GMAT Score: 750

Topic: Cancer
PostSun Sep 06, 2009 12:54 am Reply with quote

A medical article once pointed with great alarm to an increase in cancer among milk drinkers. Cancer, it seems, was becoming increasingly frequent in New England, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Switzerland, where a lot of milk is produced and consumed, while remaining rare in Ceylon, where milk is scarce. For further evidence it was pointed out that cancer was less frequent in some states of the southern United States where less milk was consumed. Also, it was pointed out, milk-drinking English women get some kinds of cancer eighteen times as frequently as Japanese women who seldom drink milk.
A little digging might uncover quite a number of ways to account for these figures, but one factor is enough by itself to show them up. Cancer is predominantly a disease that strikes in middle life or after. Switzerland and the states of the United States mentioned first are alike in having populations with relatively long spans of life. English women at the time the study was made were living an average of twelve years longer than Japanese women.
Professor Helen M. Walker has worked out an amusing illustration of the folly in assuming there must be cause and effect whenever two things vary together. In investigating the relationship between age and some physical characteristics of women, begin by measuring the angle of the feet in walking. You will find that the angle tends to be greater among older women. You might first consider whether this indicates that women grow older because they toe out, and you can see immediately that this is ridiculous. So it appears that age increases the angle between the feet, and most women must come to toe out more as they grow older.
Any such conclusion is probably false and certainly unwarranted. You could only reach it legitimately by studying the same womenâ€"or possibly equivalent groupsâ€"over a period of time. That would eliminate the factor responsible here, which is that the older women grew up at a time when a young lady was taught to toe out in walking, while the members of the younger group were learning posture in a day when that was discouraged.
When you find somebodyâ€"usually an interested partyâ€"making a fuss about a correlation, look first of all to see if it is not one of this type, produced by the stream of events, the trend of the times. In our time it is easy to show a positive correlation between any pair of things like these: number of students in college, number of inmates in mental institutions, consumption of cigarettes, incidence of heart disease, use of X-ray machines, production of false teeth, salaries of California school teachers, profits of Nevada gambling halls. To call some one of these the cause of some other is manifestly silly. But it is done every day.

12. According to the author, Professor Walker believes that
(A) women who toe out age more rapidly than women who do not
(B) most women toe out as they grow older because age increases the angle between the feet
(C) older women tend to walk with a greater angle between the feet
(D) toeing out is the reason why women grow old
(E) a causal relationship must exist whenever two things vary together
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kbharadwaj.1987
Rising GMAT Star



Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 85

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts

Test Date: 28-07-09
Target GMAT Score: 720

PostSun Sep 06, 2009 1:26 am Reply with quote

Is that C?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kaulnikhil
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!



Joined: 17 Apr 2009
Posts: 165

Thanks given: 6
Thanked 7 times in 7 posts

Target GMAT Score: 750

PostSun Sep 06, 2009 1:28 am Reply with quote

yeah .. y not B ??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rookiez
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!



Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 132

Thanks given: 12
Thanked 1 times in 1 posts
Location: Gurgaon

Target GMAT Score: 750

PostSun Sep 06, 2009 3:14 am Reply with quote

Whats the source and can you post all questions?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thanked by: kaulnikhil
heshamelaziry
GMAT Destroyer!



Joined: 26 Aug 2009
Posts: 645

Thanks given: 48
Thanked 3 times in 3 posts
Location: California

Target GMAT Score: 650

PostMon Sep 14, 2009 8:51 pm Reply with quote

It must be E. Please provide OA or don't post practice materials.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kiennguyen
Rising GMAT Star



Joined: 03 Oct 2009
Posts: 73

Thanks given: 5
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts

PostWed Nov 04, 2009 11:41 pm Reply with quote

IMO C
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kaulnikhil
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!



Joined: 17 Apr 2009
Posts: 165

Thanks given: 6
Thanked 7 times in 7 posts

Target GMAT Score: 750

PostThu Nov 05, 2009 11:48 am Reply with quote

heshamelaziry wrote:
It must be E. Please provide OA or don't post practice materials.
already said in my previous post that ans is C
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jatinder
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!



Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 280

Thanks given: 17
Thanked 5 times in 5 posts

Target GMAT Score: 760
GMAT Score: 610

PostSat Nov 07, 2009 10:32 pm Reply with quote

Should be E.
C is the author's belief, not the professor's

_________________
Keep flying
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1