302. For all his professed disdain of such activities, Auden was an inveterate literary gossip.
(A) For all his professed disdain of such activities
(B) Having always professed disdain for such activities
(C) All such activities were, he professed, disdained, and
(D) Professing that all such activities were disdained
(E) In spite of professions of disdaining all such activities
OA is A
Can someone please explain the choices.. Thanks!!
Auden
This topic has expert replies
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:31 pm
- Thanked: 128 times
- Followed by:7 members
For all his professed disdain of such activities, Auden was an inveterate literary gossip.
(A) For all his professed disdain of such activities
This is the correct answer; "For all" shows a contrast between the first and second clauses of the sentence, the first clause properly modifies "Auden," and the pronoun "his" is appropriate.
(B) Having always professed disdain for such activities
"Having" here does not show the contrast between the two clauses.
(C) All such activities were, he professed, disdained, and
"And" implies a continuation of an idea, not a contrast. Plus, this is just way too wordy and convoluted.
(D) Professing that all such activities were disdained
"Disdained" by whom? This choice changes the sentence's meaning by not explaining that it was Auden who disdained the activities. Also, using the gerund form "professing" makes it sound like Auden was professing his ideas at the same time that he was gossiping, which is not necessarily true.
(E) In spite of professions of disdaining all such activities
"In spite of" does show the necessary contrast, but "professions of disdaining" is awkward. The most concise grammatically-correct choice is the best one on the GMAT.
(A) For all his professed disdain of such activities
This is the correct answer; "For all" shows a contrast between the first and second clauses of the sentence, the first clause properly modifies "Auden," and the pronoun "his" is appropriate.
(B) Having always professed disdain for such activities
"Having" here does not show the contrast between the two clauses.
(C) All such activities were, he professed, disdained, and
"And" implies a continuation of an idea, not a contrast. Plus, this is just way too wordy and convoluted.
(D) Professing that all such activities were disdained
"Disdained" by whom? This choice changes the sentence's meaning by not explaining that it was Auden who disdained the activities. Also, using the gerund form "professing" makes it sound like Auden was professing his ideas at the same time that he was gossiping, which is not necessarily true.
(E) In spite of professions of disdaining all such activities
"In spite of" does show the necessary contrast, but "professions of disdaining" is awkward. The most concise grammatically-correct choice is the best one on the GMAT.
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 12:09 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
- GMAT Score:700
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:31 pm
- Thanked: 128 times
- Followed by:7 members
"For" does usually mean "because," but "for all" in this context means "despite" or "even though." It's one of those weird little idiomatic usages.