x-ray

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

x-ray

by gmatmachoman » Thu Feb 25, 2010 8:13 am
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,


(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton induced x-ray emission

(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,

(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-ray emission,

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 407
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:20 am
Location: India
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:1 members

by hrishi19884 » Thu Feb 25, 2010 8:20 am
gmatmachoman wrote:Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
Correct : Inferred meaning is correct. Sentence is grammatically correct

(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton induced x-ray emission
Incorrect :"having the ability" induces error

(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
Incorrect : "called proton-induced x-ray emission" has no meaning in the sentence.

(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,
Incorrect : same as C

(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-ray emission,
Incorrect : meaning changes also "called proton-induced x-ray emission" is improper
I will go with A
Hrishi

"As you sow, so shall you reap"

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1578
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 8:02 am
Thanked: 128 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:760

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Thu Feb 25, 2010 8:25 am
I would choose A

A- Correct

B- "having the ability" is a misplaced modifier

C- I'm actually not sure if this is wrong and if it is I dont' know the exact reason, it just didn't sound as good as A to me

D- "and without destroying it" is awkward and wrong

E- same as D
https://www.beatthegmat.com/the-retake-o ... 51414.html

Brandon Dorsey
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Buy any Veritas Prep book(s) and receive access to 5 Practice Cats for free! Learn More.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 407
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:20 am
Location: India
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:1 members

by hrishi19884 » Thu Feb 25, 2010 8:49 am
osirus0830 wrote:
C- I'm actually not sure if this is wrong and if it is I dont' know the exact reason, it just didn't sound as good as A to me

I think why C is wrong because "technique" should modify "proton-induced x-ray emission" but instead it is modifying "CALLED proton-induced x-ray emission"

Whereas in A, it removes the ambiguity by writing the sentence completely "a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission"
Hrishi

"As you sow, so shall you reap"

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1578
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 8:02 am
Thanked: 128 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:760

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Thu Feb 25, 2010 8:53 am
hrishi19884 wrote:
osirus0830 wrote:
C- I'm actually not sure if this is wrong and if it is I dont' know the exact reason, it just didn't sound as good as A to me

I think why C is wrong because "technique" should modify "proton-induced x-ray emission" but instead it is modifying "CALLED proton-induced x-ray emission"

Whereas in A, it removes the ambiguity by writing the sentence completely "a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission"
thanks, check your PM box
https://www.beatthegmat.com/the-retake-o ... 51414.html

Brandon Dorsey
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Buy any Veritas Prep book(s) and receive access to 5 Practice Cats for free! Learn More.