• Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider

antecedents?

This topic has 3 member replies
antec0721 Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
22 Dec 2009
Posted:
8 messages
Thanked:
3 times
Test Date:
2/20/09
Target GMAT Score:
700

antecedents?

Post Thu Feb 25, 2010 1:29 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    I was looking at the following question:

    In 1923, the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia as unconstitutional, and ruling that it was a form of price fixing and, as such, an abridgment of the right of contract.

    a) the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia as unconstitutional, and
    b) the Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia, and
    c) the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia,
    d) a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court,
    e) when the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia as unconstitutional,




    The original answer was C. The explanation in the guide explains that D is ambiguous and causes a misplaced modifier. Can someone explain this to me? Also, I am getting confused about antecedent rules. How do we know that it is referring to "minimum wage" and not "Supreme Court" or "District of Columbia"?

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    Post Thu Feb 25, 2010 3:36 am
    antec0721 wrote:
    I was looking at the following question:

    In 1923, the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia as unconstitutional, and ruling that it was a form of price fixing and, as such, an abridgment of the right of contract.

    a) the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia as unconstitutional, and
    b) the Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia, and
    c) the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia,
    d) a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court,
    e) when the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia as unconstitutional,




    The original answer was C. The explanation in the guide explains that D is ambiguous and causes a misplaced modifier. Can someone explain this to me? Also, I am getting confused about antecedent rules. How do we know that it is referring to "minimum wage" and not "Supreme Court" or "District of Columbia"?

    The question here is checking for IDIOM .

    And the idiom rule it checks is "the Supreme Cort declared X unconstitutional"- this is correct Idiom.

    You con not say declared AS

    OR

    Considered AS these are some of the wrong Idioms we use in speech but is often checked in GMAT. In both the cases the correct usage is DECLARED and CONSIDERED .



    a) the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia as unconstitutional, and[Idiom is wrong ]
    b) the Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia, and[Idiom is wrong ]
    c) the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia,
    [Correct Idiom]
    d) a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court,[correct idiom but in passive voice so eliminate. ]
    e) when the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia as unconstitutional,[Idiom is wrong ]

    As you can see the question can be easily solved if you know the Idiom , also option D is in passive voice thats the reason why you need to eliminate it.

    In this question I dont see any IT with antecedent problem can you point them out .

    tanviet Legendary Member Default Avatar
    Joined
    20 May 2008
    Posted:
    1404 messages
    Followed by:
    2 members
    Thanked:
    18 times
    Post Thu Feb 25, 2010 3:58 am
    in D, "minimum wage was declared, ruling.."

    this means "wage was declare and ,at the same time,wage rule" and impossible

    focus differences among answer choices to find error. last time I fail because I do not attack SC this way.

    samarpan_bschool Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    31 Dec 2009
    Posted:
    106 messages
    Thanked:
    4 times
    Test Date:
    13th Aug'11
    GMAT Score:
    700
    Post Thu Feb 25, 2010 7:11 am
    1. The modifier problem discussed is one that involves 'present participle' - verb + ing

    Normally present participle, if preceded or followed by a COMMA, then it acts as a verb modifier, which should make sense with the subject.

    In the case of option D -> Just look at the subject of the sentence - 'a minimum wage'

    Can 'minimum wage' make a 'ruling' ? NO. So it is not logically correct.

    2. In case of antecedents, the thumb rule is the subject of second clause refers to the subject of the main clause / object of the second clause refers to the object of the previous clause

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 180 topics
    2 lheiannie07 65 topics
    3 Roland2rule 49 topics
    4 ardz24 44 topics
    5 LUANDATO 23 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    147 posts
    2 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    103 posts
    3 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    102 posts
    4 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    94 posts
    5 image description DavidG@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    76 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts