Source: Veritas Prep CR2
99. Although many seventeenth-century broadsides, popular ballads printed on a single sheet of paper and widely sold by street peddlers, were moralizing in nature, this is not evidence that most seventeenth-century people were serious about moral values. While over half of surviving broadsides contain moralizing statements, and it is known that many people purchased such compositions, it is not known why they did so, nor is it known how their own beliefs related to what they read.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A: Like other forms of cheap seventeenth-century popular literature, surviving broadsides seems mostly to have been rather low literary quality and to have been written by hack writers.
B: In many moralizing ballades, the moral content was confined to a single stanza expressing a pious sentiment tacked onto a sensationalized account of the crime and adultery.
C: Some seventeenth-century ballad sellers also sold some sermons printed in pamphlet form.
D: The clergy occasionally stuck broadsides warning about the danger of strong drink on the doors of seventeenth-century alehouses.
E: Well-educated people of the seventeenth century held broadsides in contempt and considered broadside peddlers to be disreputable vagrants.
OA: B
Although many
This topic has expert replies
- YellowSapphire
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:57 pm
- Location: India
- Thanked: 1 times
Last edited by YellowSapphire on Fri Oct 01, 2010 7:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Yellow Sapphire
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:25 pm
- Thanked: 5 times
- GMAT Score:730
I would go with (D), I see 2 problems with (B), first it does not mention 17th century. so we are not sure what the date on these pamphlets is. Second, even if the religious message was short, there is little evidence that people did not follow the religious message.
With (d), what is stated is that quite a few of these pamphlets may be put at bars (alehouses) to moralize people... so created do ensure that people go on the righteous path...
again, I may be wrong.. Whats the OA
With (d), what is stated is that quite a few of these pamphlets may be put at bars (alehouses) to moralize people... so created do ensure that people go on the righteous path...
again, I may be wrong.. Whats the OA
Aim high!!
Achieve excellence!!
Achieve excellence!!
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 10:16 pm
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1119
- Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 am
- Thanked: 29 times
- Followed by:3 members
ok. this cr is tough for me bc there are so many new word.YellowSapphire wrote:Source: Veritas Prep CR2
99. Although many seventeenth-century broadsides, popular ballads printed on a single sheet of paper and widely sold by street peddlers, were moralizing in nature, this is not evidence that most seventeenth-century people were serious about moral values. While over half of surviving broadsides contain moralizing statements, and it is known that many people purchased such compositions, it is not known why they did so, nor is it known how their own beliefs related to what they read.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A: Like other forms of cheap seventeenth-century popular literature, surviving broadsides seems mostly to have been rather low literary quality and to have been written by hack writers.
B: In many moralizing ballades, the moral content was confined to a single stanza expressing a pious sentiment tacked onto a sensationalized account of the crime and adultery.
C: Some seventeenth-century ballad sellers also sold some sermons printed in pamphlet form.
D: The clergy occasionally stuck broadsides warning about the danger of strong drink on the doors of seventeenth-century alehouses.
E: Well-educated people of the seventeenth century held broadsides in contempt and considered broadside peddlers to be disreputable vagrants.
B is my choice
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:25 pm
- Thanked: 5 times
- GMAT Score:730
It seems the OA is B. I looked up the answer key on Amazon..
https://www.amazon.com/Critical-Reasonin ... 1936240092
Go to page 160 and look for Question number 99
https://www.amazon.com/Critical-Reasonin ... 1936240092
Go to page 160 and look for Question number 99
Aim high!!
Achieve excellence!!
Achieve excellence!!
- Tani
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:08 pm
- Location: St. Louis
- Thanked: 312 times
- Followed by:90 members
It's B. The conclusion is that the fact that there is some moral content doesn't prove that broadsides were bought for moral enlightenment. B tells us the moral content was small and that they were mainly about GMAT and violence. That supports the contention that they weren't purchased for their moral content. Kind of like saying people buy Playboy for the articles.
Tani Wolff
- YellowSapphire
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:57 pm
- Location: India
- Thanked: 1 times
- Tani
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:08 pm
- Location: St. Louis
- Thanked: 312 times
- Followed by:90 members
WE are told there is very little moral content and a lot of GMAT and violence - therefore, we can't assume they are buying it for the moral content, but for the GMAT.
Tani Wolff
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
OK boys and girls.
i think the problem here is more fundamental -- i think that a lot of people solving this problem are not actually grasping what is the conclusion of this argument. in particular, anyone who is picking choice (d) is mistaken about what he or she thinks is the conclusion. (in order to pick (d), you'd have to think that the argument is trying to state exactly the opposite of what it's really saying.)
for easy consumption, i've highlighted the conclusion of the argument in big, bold red text below.
basically, (b), by indicating that there is other alluring content in the poems, gives us additional reason to suspect that the moral values aren't the main point.
i think the problem here is more fundamental -- i think that a lot of people solving this problem are not actually grasping what is the conclusion of this argument. in particular, anyone who is picking choice (d) is mistaken about what he or she thinks is the conclusion. (in order to pick (d), you'd have to think that the argument is trying to state exactly the opposite of what it's really saying.)
for easy consumption, i've highlighted the conclusion of the argument in big, bold red text below.
now that this is clear, i suspect that most of the posters here will have a much easier time understanding why the correct answer here is correct (and why the wrong answers are, well, wrong).YellowSapphire wrote:Source: Veritas Prep CR2
99. Although many seventeenth-century broadsides, popular ballads printed on a single sheet of paper and widely sold by street peddlers, were moralizing in nature, this is not evidence that most seventeenth-century people were serious about moral values. While over half of surviving broadsides contain moralizing statements, and it is known that many people purchased such compositions, it is not known why they did so, nor is it known how their own beliefs related to what they read.
basically, (b), by indicating that there is other alluring content in the poems, gives us additional reason to suspect that the moral values aren't the main point.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
by the way, to the person who wrote this:
here, you are nitpicking on the little details of the argument. that is an excellent strategy to use on other question types, such as "find the assumption" or "draw the conclusion" (which hinge on whether the answer choices stay within the exact scope of the given statements), but it's not a good strategy to use on strengthen/weaken problems.
on strengthen/weaken problems, don't worry about small details. instead, use "real world thinking", and consider the big picture of the argument.
this is sort of annoying -- you have to go back and forth between
* thinking like a real-world human being (on strengthen/weaken and "explain the discrepancy" problems)
and
* thinking like an academic robot, placing little value on common sense (on "find the assumption" and "draw the conclusion" problems)
... but, if you don't understand the important difference between the two modes of thinking, you will constantly be muddled when you go back and forth between the problem types.
this is NOT the way to approach strengthen/weaken problems.007.r.mason wrote:I would go with (D), I see 2 problems with (B), first it does not mention 17th century. so we are not sure what the date on these pamphlets is. Second, even if the religious message was short, there is little evidence that people did not follow the religious message.
here, you are nitpicking on the little details of the argument. that is an excellent strategy to use on other question types, such as "find the assumption" or "draw the conclusion" (which hinge on whether the answer choices stay within the exact scope of the given statements), but it's not a good strategy to use on strengthen/weaken problems.
on strengthen/weaken problems, don't worry about small details. instead, use "real world thinking", and consider the big picture of the argument.
this is sort of annoying -- you have to go back and forth between
* thinking like a real-world human being (on strengthen/weaken and "explain the discrepancy" problems)
and
* thinking like an academic robot, placing little value on common sense (on "find the assumption" and "draw the conclusion" problems)
... but, if you don't understand the important difference between the two modes of thinking, you will constantly be muddled when you go back and forth between the problem types.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
I agree with lunar. I think many people got lost in all the new terms, especially since the answers require some time to get a little used to.diebeatsthegmat wrote: ok. this cr is tough for me bc there are so many new word.
B is my choice
In many moralizing ballades, the moral content was confined to a single stanza expressing a pious sentiment tacked onto a sensationalized account of the crime and adultery.
B is the correct choice because it provides an explanation that while there was moral content. the key word is that it's confined, meaning that there was moral content was sparse. I could see how this info could be difficult for non-native speakers to grasp.