• Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep

alligator population

This topic has 2 expert replies and 9 member replies
maihuna Legendary Member Default Avatar
Joined
28 Dec 2008
Posted:
1578 messages
Followed by:
9 members
Thanked:
82 times
GMAT Score:
720

alligator population

Post Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:58 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Parland’s alligator population has been declining in recent years, primarily because of hunting. Alligators prey heavily on a species of freshwater fish that is highly valued as food by Parlanders, who had hoped that the decline in the alligator population would lead to an increase in the numbers of these fish available for human consumption. Yet the population of this fish species has also declined, even though the annual number caught for human consumption has not increased.

    Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the decline in the population of the fish species?
    A. The decline in the alligator population has meant that fishers can work in some parts of lakes and rivers that were formerly too dangerous.
    B. Over the last few years, Parland’s commercial fishing enterprises have increased the number of fishing boats they use.
    C. Many Parlanders who hunt alligators do so because of the high market price of alligator skins, not because of the threat alligators pose to the fish population.
    D. During Parland’s dry season, holes dug by alligators remain filled with water long enough to provide a safe place for the eggs of this fish species to hatch.
    E. In several neighboring countries through which Parland’s rivers also flow, alligators are at risk of extinction as a result of extensive hunting.
    AnswerVery Happy

    _________________
    Charged up again to beat the beast Smile

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    scoobydooby Legendary Member Default Avatar
    Joined
    27 Aug 2008
    Posted:
    1035 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    104 times
    Post Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:19 am
    would go with D, as it gives a reason why there might be a positive correlation between the decline in the number of alligators and the fish

    A, B, C and E are out of scope.

    SYim Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    07 Oct 2008
    Posted:
    29 messages
    Post Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:05 pm
    IMO D

    kabirmohammed Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    23 Nov 2009
    Posted:
    15 messages
    Thanked:
    1 times
    Post Mon Dec 21, 2009 3:47 pm
    IMO C

    gmatmachoman Legendary Member Default Avatar
    Joined
    28 Jul 2008
    Posted:
    2326 messages
    Followed by:
    2 members
    Thanked:
    173 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    740
    GMAT Score:
    710
    Post Mon Dec 21, 2009 9:41 pm
    scoobydooby wrote:
    would go with D, as it gives a reason why there might be a positive correlation between the decline in the number of alligators and the fish

    A, B, C and E are out of scope.
    IMO B

    D quotes only for the "dry season" but the argument talks about few years....

    Isn't B fix the issue?

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Testluv GMAT Instructor Default Avatar
    Joined
    19 Oct 2009
    Posted:
    1302 messages
    Followed by:
    162 members
    Thanked:
    539 times
    GMAT Score:
    800
    Post Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:20 am
    Because it uses the word "explain", we can tell from the question stem (which we should always read first) that this is a paradox question (@gmatmachoman: in paradox question, the stimulus does not present an argument; instead the stimulus presents 2 or more facts out of whose combination arises a paradox).

    In paradox questions, we look for a contrast keyword such as "yet", "but", "however" etc. Such a word will center the paradox; oftentimes by putting the fact that comes before "yet" together with the fact that comes after "yet" we will grip the paradox.

    Another term for "paradox" is just "surprise".

    If we look at the stimulus, we see the first word of the last sentence is "yet". Therefore, we can comprehend the paradox by contrasting the fact that comes before "yet" against the fact that comes after "yet". The paradox is: the alligators eat the fish and yet when the Parlanders kill the alligators there are fewer (not more) fish! This is indeed surprising.

    Now, we go to the answer choices searching for one that will resolve the paradox, relieve our surprise.

    Choice D resolves the paradox: it tells us that, by killing off the alligators, the Parlanders are actually decreasing the likelihood that the fish eggs will hatch. (The alligators dig holes that allow the fisheggs to thrive; ironically, the alligators help to sustain the fish population, even though they themselves eat the fish).

    _________________
    Kaplan Teacher in Toronto

    Thanked by: Venkitaraman
    Free GMAT Practice Test under Proctored Conditions! - Find a practice test near you or live and online in Kaplan's Classroom Anywhere environment. Register today!
    Focus_gmat Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    17 Dec 2009
    Posted:
    17 messages
    Target GMAT Score:
    700+
    GMAT Score:
    600
    Post Tue Dec 22, 2009 5:02 am
    Testluv,

    Could you please help me understand why A is incorrect.

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Testluv GMAT Instructor Default Avatar
    Joined
    19 Oct 2009
    Posted:
    1302 messages
    Followed by:
    162 members
    Thanked:
    539 times
    GMAT Score:
    800
    Post Tue Dec 22, 2009 5:42 am
    Focus_gmat wrote:
    Testluv,

    Could you please help me understand why A is incorrect.
    Sure.

    Well, the paradox is: why the heck is the fish population declining when the Parlanders are killing off alligators which eat the fish? Shouldn't the fish population then be increasing? This is the paradox, the surprise. We have to find an answer choice that explains this paradox. When looking at each answer choice in a paradox question, you have to ask yourself: Does this take care of it? Does this choice make me no longer wonder? Does it relieve my surprise, does it resolve the paradox?

    Choice A doesn't come close to resolving this paradox; instead, it points out that, from killing off some of the alligators, the fishers have enjoyed a benefit--namely, they can work in places where it was previously too dangerous to work. How does this help in explaining why the fish population is declining?....It doesn't help at all-- in fact, the choice A doesn't even talk about fish. Thus, we are still wondering about the paradox.

    _________________
    Kaplan Teacher in Toronto

    Free GMAT Practice Test under Proctored Conditions! - Find a practice test near you or live and online in Kaplan's Classroom Anywhere environment. Register today!
    gmatmachoman Legendary Member Default Avatar
    Joined
    28 Jul 2008
    Posted:
    2326 messages
    Followed by:
    2 members
    Thanked:
    173 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    740
    GMAT Score:
    710
    Post Mon Jan 18, 2010 1:40 am
    @ Testluv:
    Choice D resolves the paradox: it tells us that, by killing off the alligators, the Parlanders are actually decreasing the likelihood that the fish eggs will hatch. (The alligators dig holes that allow the fisheggs to thrive; ironically, the alligators help to sustain the fish population, even though they themselves eat the fish)

    But what abt B??

    B. Over the last few years, Parland’s commercial fishing enterprises have increased the number of fishing boats they use.

    Reasoning: SInce number of fishing boats have increased it could have increased the number of fish being caught ,thereby reducing its count..

    Is that not right??

    Yeah I agree that D tries to link up the stated facts in the argument whereas B altogether brings in a new version to resolve the "surprise".

    Plz do post your line of reasoning. I agree its easy to find a reason for a right answer rather finding a wrong reason for a
    wrong one...(Deepak..that was ur fav Quote")

    DanaJ Site Admin
    Joined
    01 Jan 2009
    Posted:
    2567 messages
    Followed by:
    550 members
    Thanked:
    712 times
    GMAT Score:
    770
    Post Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:48 am
    Received a PM.

    @gamtmachoman: The fact that they have increased the number of boats might have an impact on the fish population, but we are straightforwardly told that this is not the case. Check out this excerpt from the stimulus:

    Yet the population of this fish species has also declined, even though the annual number caught for human consumption has not increased.

    The bolded part should help highlight why your reasoning is incorrect.

    gmatmachoman Legendary Member Default Avatar
    Joined
    28 Jul 2008
    Posted:
    2326 messages
    Followed by:
    2 members
    Thanked:
    173 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    740
    GMAT Score:
    710
    Post Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:19 am
    DanaJ wrote:
    Received a PM.

    @gamtmachoman: The fact that they have increased the number of boats might have an impact on the fish population, but we are straightforwardly told that this is not the case. Check out this excerpt from the stimulus:

    Yet the population of this fish species has also declined, even though the annual number caught for human consumption has not increased.

    The bolded part should help highlight why your reasoning is incorrect.
    Seems convincing....Agreed!!

    joseph32 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    22 Aug 2015
    Posted:
    303 messages
    Post Sun May 15, 2016 10:51 pm
    I believe the answer should be B

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 lheiannie07 116 topics
    2 LUANDATO 62 topics
    3 swerve 62 topics
    4 ardz24 61 topics
    5 AAPL 58 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    172 posts
    2 image description Scott@TargetTestPrep

    Target Test Prep

    154 posts
    3 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    131 posts
    4 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    127 posts
    5 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    125 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts