act_sample1_54

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

act_sample1_54

by sanju09 » Wed May 19, 2010 3:22 am
The lengths in the rectangle attached below are in inches. What is the shaded area in square inches?
(A) 70
(B) 38
(C) 34
(D) 21
(E) 8


[spoiler]source: www.analyzemath.com[/spoiler]
Attachments
act_sample1_54.gif
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com

Legendary Member
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 12:33 am
Thanked: 47 times
Followed by:2 members

by kstv » Wed May 19, 2010 3:30 am
IMO B
Area of Rect = 7*10
Area of the triangles = 1/2(42+16+6) = 32
Shaded area = 70-32

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:07 am
Location: Bangalore
Thanked: 9 times
GMAT Score:730

by ballubalraj » Wed May 19, 2010 3:37 am
Please see the attached diagram:

lenght x = 7 - 4 = 3

Now, lets calculate the areas of trianges denoted by A, B, C

Area of A = (7*6)/2 = 21
Area of B = (4*4)/2 = 8
Area of C = (3*2)/2 = 3

Area of rectangle = 10*7 = 70

Area of shaded portion = Total area of rectangle - Total area of un-shaded portion = 70 - (21+8+3) = 38

Answer B.

There is another approach (but much time consuming for this example) to solve this problem. Calculate the sides of the trapezium by applying pythagoras theorem and then calculate the area of the trapezium by formula = (sum of parallel sides)*Height/2.

Please let me know if the above explantion is not good.
Attachments
act_sample1_54_188_1.GIF

Legendary Member
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 12:33 am
Thanked: 47 times
Followed by:2 members

by kstv » Wed May 19, 2010 3:47 am
@ ballubalraj
Please let me know if the above explantion is not good.
What if it is v good.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

by sanju09 » Wed May 19, 2010 3:50 am
kstv wrote:@ ballubalraj
Please let me know if the above explantion is not good.
What if it is v good.
both explanations are same & good
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 6:08 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by gmatguytoday » Thu May 20, 2010 4:47 pm
ballubalraj wrote:Please see the attached diagram:

lenght x = 7 - 4 = 3

Now, lets calculate the areas of trianges denoted by A, B, C

Area of A = (7*6)/2 = 21
Area of B = (4*4)/2 = 8
Area of C = (3*2)/2 = 3

Area of rectangle = 10*7 = 70

Area of shaded portion = Total area of rectangle - Total area of un-shaded portion = 70 - (21+8+3) = 38

Answer B.

There is another approach (but much time consuming for this example) to solve this problem. Calculate the sides of the trapezium by applying pythagoras theorem and then calculate the area of the trapezium by formula = (sum of parallel sides)*Height/2.

Please let me know if the above explantion is not good.

Why do I not get the same answer by using pythagorean theorem....I get an irrational number....I think too many hours of studying has finally gotten to me!