a < b < c

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 510
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 2:24 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:5 members

a < b < c

by j_shreyans » Thu Oct 30, 2014 10:57 pm
If abc ≠ 0, is a < b < c ?

(1) 1/c < 1/b < 1/a

(2) c > a

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Oct 31, 2014 12:40 am
j_shreyans wrote:If abc ≠ 0, is a < b < c ?

(1) 1/c < 1/b < 1/a

(2) c > a
Statement 1: 1/c < 1/b < 1/a
In light of statement 2, test one case where c>a and one case where a<c.
Case 1: c=3, b=2, and a=1
The constraint that 1/c < 1/b < 1/a is satisfied:
1/3 < 1/2 < 1.
In this case, a<b<c.

Case 2: c=-1, b=2, and a=1
The constraint that 1/c < 1/b < 1/a is satisfied:
-1 < 1/2 < 1.
In this case, c<a<b.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: c > a
No information about b.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
a < c and 1/a > 1/c.
Implication:
a and c must have the SAME SIGN, as in the following cases:
a=1, c=3.
a=1/3, c=1.
a=-3, c=-1.
a=-1, c=-1/3.

Since 1/c < 1/b < 1/a -- and a and c must have the same sign -- ALL 3 VALUES must have the same sign, as in the following cases:
a=1, b=2, c=3.
a=1/3, b=1/2, c=1.
a=-3, b=-2, c=-1.
a=-1, b=-1/2, c=-1/3.
In every case, a<b<c.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
Followed by:119 members
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Fri Oct 31, 2014 10:25 am
Another approach!

Start with the easier statement. S2 tells us nothing about b, so it's clearly INSUFFICIENT.

S1 gives us 1/c < 1/b < 1/a, so we know that 1/c < 1/a.

Now let's consider two possibilities.

#1: a > c

If a > c and 1/a > 1/c, then a > 0 and 0 > c. In this case, c > b > a is impossible.

#2: c > a

In this case, c > b > a IS possible.

Since we could have either a > c or c > a, S1 is INSUFFICIENT.

Now let's take the two together.

If 1/a > 1/c and c > a, we must have either c > a > 0 or 0 > c > a.

In the first case, all three numbers are positive. If 1/a > 1/b > 1/c > 0, then c > b > a > 0.

In the second case, all three numbers are negative. If 0 > 1/a > 1/b > 1/c, then 0 > c > b > a.

So in both cases, c > b > a, and the two statements together are SUFFICIENT.